George McPhee an awful GM

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
40,848
20,449
It was going to be bad no matter who he chose and you know it. McPhee chose some decent players all things considered but for the most part is stocking up on anything he can for the future. Personally I think some ppl are overreacting.

Bad& abysmal are different things.
And again I'm surprised by how few assets they got as a reward for icing roster that bad.

They don't have anyone to drive offense, I question if they have a player to build around the defense, what's the net looking like after Fleury and so on.
 

Langway

In den Wolken
Jul 7, 2006
32,389
9,100
Did lv hire the old caps scouting team? Do people seriously think gms make the choice for picks based on the few games they watched over what their expert scouts tell them. Maybe I'm crazy but I'll bet when he was gm of the caps he was drafting based on info/lists his scouting dept gave him.
He did hire one of the two European amateur scouts that Washington leaned on over the years. McPhee does also shape those lists and refine that process over time.

I thought Vegas had a strong draft and McPhee deserves credit there but it's clear they don't plan on being highly competitive for at least three seasons or so. They have gladly walked away from established talent due to believing they can find impact upside in the draft. The problem with outright tanking is it guarantees nothing re: draft position. Look at Colorado this year. That won't happen all of the time but it's not like it used to be. Next year's draft seems sufficiently deep to where they should get a possible franchise player in the top five regardless but it's tougher than ever to make that the sole building philosophy of a team.
 

Brainiac

Registered Offender
Feb 17, 2013
12,709
610
Montreal
I think he would have been better off just picking the very best players he could and trade them for future. The deals he made before/during exp. draft were meh.
 

Perfect_Drug

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
15,530
11,826
Montreal
I love how the logic was: Every team could trade all their players that were exposed.

Because no other teams had protection issues right???

Which teams could take Manson, Dumba, and Vatanen?

If they were traded, it would likely free up another protected player.
 

sheriff bart

Where are the white women at
Nov 11, 2010
2,755
14,075
Rock Ridge
It sure looks like he left a lot of meat on the bone. Canes fan here. He took a guy I didn't even know was in the system (and certainly no NHLer) and a 5th and passed on Stempniak and Nordstrom. Stemp could have been flipped at the deadline for a lot better than a 5th. Nordy would have been a cheap, young forward that would have been a legit NHLer for the Knights.
 

ICanMotteBelieveIt

Registered User
Jan 11, 2013
8,443
4,987
(mod) Instead of playing hardball and forcing some GM's hands. He chose to hold their hands and promise to not pick a lot of players of said teams roster for a very small incentive most of the time

This is what's boring with the league. The GM's are afraid to offend other GM's etc. There's a reason as to why you EXTREMELY rarely see an offersheet.

Even if they know they could **** up that team/possibly land that young RFA. They don't take the chance.


It's quite sad really.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,197
138,532
Bojangles Parking Lot
And having Vegas be that bad for that long is exactly what the NHL was trying to avoid. :laugh:

That's the part that's mystifying to me. The league basically said, "here, go make yourself a decent team". And GMGM was like, "no I'm good, I'd rather start from zero."

And then just to be sure, he salted the earth and poisoned the wells to make sure he didn't accidentally stumble across something valuable.
 

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,057
13,508
Philadelphia
The problem with the "he could have flipped [player] at the deadline for more!" logic is that he has to move players now. No matter how he drafted he was getting 30 players for a 23 man roster. He was either taking waiver exempt guys (few of which were exposed due to the rules) or he has to trim the roster down to 23 via trade. Otherwise he's going to lose some of these players for free via waivers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ridley Simon

Sam Spade

Registered User
May 4, 2009
27,484
16,207
Maryland
He's tanking. I don't know why so many people are surprised by this.

If only he were actually smart enough to tank. He is a moron and any Caps fan that has followed the team for the last 20 years will tell you that.

Dumb deal (Forsberg/Eakin, all of his trade day acquisitions) after dumb contract (Nylander/Poti, etc.) his legacy draft picks (Gustovson), his wasted high draft picks (Jeff Schultz), just on and on.

I am blown away that the owner of an NHL team looked at his resume of complete failure and gave him the job of running their franchise. Unbelievable really.
 

KPower

Registered User
Jan 17, 2012
9,343
4,333
The problem with the "he could have flipped [player] at the deadline for more!" logic is that he has to move players now. No matter how he drafted he was getting 30 players for a 23 man roster. He was either taking waiver exempt guys (few of which were exposed due to the rules) or he has to trim the roster down to 23 via trade. Otherwise he's going to lose some of these players for free via waivers.

So 7 players he has to shed...

3 or 4 he drafted would pass through waivers if not more.

So he needed to trade 2 or 3 guys..and he has until October to do it.

Teams will be scrambling for a top 4 dman like Methot after the free agents are gone.
 

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,057
13,508
Philadelphia
7 players + every free agent he signs. Shipachyov already brings it to 8. And once again, October isn't the trade deadline. If you feel he could earn more on players in October than June, make that argument. But for now the trade deadline is a straw man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bluenotes27

sheriff bart

Where are the white women at
Nov 11, 2010
2,755
14,075
Rock Ridge
The problem with the "he could have flipped [player] at the deadline for more!" logic is that he has to move players now. No matter how he drafted he was getting 30 players for a 23 man roster. He was either taking waiver exempt guys (few of which were exposed due to the rules) or he has to trim the roster down to 23 via trade. Otherwise he's going to lose some of these players for free via waivers.

And that's fine if you are getting a 1st rounder to "lay off" a guy. When you are getting a 5th, not so much.
 

King In The North

Sean Bennett
Jul 9, 2007
12,000
2,358
Winterfell
The way he has constructed that team is honestly shocking to me. The NHL laid out a set of rules that gave him a good chance to skip the "terrible expansion team" phase. And even until the day of the draft, it looked like he had done a great job of maneuvering assets to get a lot of bang for his buck.

Then he started calling names, and ever since then it's been downhill. I can understand passing up good players to position himself for the future, but he's collecting 5ths and ECHL-level prospects. It's bizarre.

He gets a pass given that it's his and the franchises' first few years so he's going for a lottery pick.

I still understand why Ottawa and Vegas couldn't work out a deal for Methot, though.
 

Mc5RingsAndABeer

5-14-6-1
May 25, 2011
20,184
1,385
He's tanking, but doing it stupidly. You don't just bottom out and then make a few high draft picks save your franchise. You need those high-quality supporting pieces (e.g. Vatanen, Dumba, etc...), but it looks like he was too worried about being competitive.
 

theIceWookie

#LeafHysteriaAlert
Dec 19, 2010
9,039
30
Canada
Man some of you don't have a fricking clue.

Vegas is in great shape and they won't be as bad as people think this year. Shipachev, Perron, Marchessault, Neal, Fleury, Eakin, Garrison, Smith, Theodore is a better core than a lot of tanking teams from recent years (EDM, ARZ, COL, TOR, BUF). They will also sign free agents and possibly bring in one of Gusev or Dadonov. They will be plenty competitive until the trade deadline, where they will unload some vets, as they should.

They drafted 4 quality prospects at the draft + added a lot of other prospects and tons of draft picks, with more on the way. What they need to do is collect draft picks and prospects.

McPhee is doing a good job, and no, Vegas won't be part of the playoffs in the next 3 years and that's just fine. But we will bring up all these threads in a couple of years when Vegas is a young power house with a lot of depth, and it will be funny to see all these clueless posts bashing McPhee!

He's playing the long game, which is the smart move.

Being a team that can compete for a playoff spot this season is all fine and well, but it doesn't do jack for the team long term. In fact it sets the team up to be in the mediocre middle ground that can be so hard to escape from.

McPhee decided to set the team up to win long term. Adding 12 draft picks in their inaugural draft, including 5 in the first two rounds is huge. They used those picks very well, adding a strong four prospects with their first four picks.

He did a fantastic job
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
35,584
1,260
Montreal, QC
Man, I can only imagine the reaction on messages boards and social media when the expansion Islanders, Capitals, Jets, Senators and others started playing back in the day. It would have been truly ugly.

How can you judge a General Manager based off of one expansion draft and one draft weekend? As Rodney Dangerfield would say, "boy, tough crowd I tell ya."

Give the man a little bit of time, shall we?
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,756
29,235
Man, I can only imagine the reaction on messages boards and social media when the expansion Islanders, Capitals, Jets, Senators and others started playing back in the day. It would have been truly ugly.

How can you judge a General Manager based off of one expansion draft and one draft weekend? As Rodney Dangerfield would say, "boy, tough crowd I tell ya."

Give the man a little bit of time, shall we?

GMGM is a known quantity though, and other teams didn't have nearly the opportunities at expansion that he did. He had Minny and the Islanders over a barrel, and let both of them off easy. Doesn't really make sense (especially Minny because the return was dreadful - would have gotten more just from taking Scandella/Dumba or whichever forward they would have had to expose to protect them).
 

Kamiccolo

Truly wonderful, the mind of a child is.
Aug 30, 2011
26,828
16,944
Undisclosed research facility
Methot trade is just one of the worst deals I've ever seen. I'm confident the average HF poster would know to hang onto him until mid summer when a team gets desperate enough after FA to offer their first.

Or play the season and move him at the TDl @ 50% if you wanted to tank. A top pairing D cheap would demand a top prospect + first.

Only way the deal makes sense is if Methot said he wouldn't report and GMGM moved him before the news got out or something.
 

cramdizzl

cram it
Jan 5, 2012
2,452
248
Western NY
Terrible job, George. Left a lot on the table. A lot.

What benefit do these GMs think they're getting by trying not to upset their competition?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HanSolo

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad