Why not? Rules are rules.
It does not matter what your stance is on PEDs. It's not part of the rules and gives an advantage, that simple.
Jones is a massive repeat offender. Whether or not he's the greatest, I'd argue he cannot play by the rules of his contract and should not be in the octagon.
He's had criminal issues outside of the octagon, does play not play by the rules either.
He was flagged for anomalies in UFC 182 where he beat DC
Kicked out of UFC 200 where he was scheduled to face DC
Was found with steroids in his body at UFC 214 weigh ins...again vs DC
USADA started in the UFC July 1st, 2015.
Jones fought UFC 197
Jones was caught with PEDs UFC 200
Jones was caught with PEDS UFC 214
The guy had 3 scheduled fights since USADA came in, he couldn't make it to one and failed another next. He's at 33% success of following rules since USADA came into UFC.
Yeah, you may be for or against steroid use but it's against the rules. I may think throwing the puck into the net with your hands is a goal but it isn't. That's the rules.
I wouldn't be shocked to see Jones lose vs Gus if he's clean. We'll see.
Euh...not sure how that works as an analogy. Some hockey players have used PEDs and tested positive, not sure what throwing the puck into the net has to do with anything. Ya, it's disallowed. So? If Lemieux did that, does this mean he isn't one of the greatest anymore?
Did Jon Bones use a sword or a new weapon?
The idea that using PEDs suddenly makes you a better fighter is all Jean Claude Van Damne Universal Soldier style. Give him a drug and suddenly he becomes a super fighter.
Do PEDs help? Of course they do. Are they the difference between a champ and a nobody? I don't think so.
Should you have an asterisk next to your name? Absolutely. Should your name be removed entirely? Absolutely not.
The idea that all the hard work, effort, practice, and fight dominance should just be 100% voided and unrecognized because of PEDs is just ignorant to me.
You put GOAT names in the discussion, and the one who never tested positive has an advantage. GSP or Jones, then GSP no question, but should A.Silva and J.Jones not even part of the conversation?...Of course they should.