Providence Bruins General Discussion IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoBs

Registered User
Nov 21, 2009
7,927
3,671
USA
Who sits when Nordstrom returns?
Donato or Backus
Can’t imagine Sweeney wants to see his two free agent signings Moore and Backes sit out
 

Fenian24

Registered User
Jun 14, 2010
10,352
13,419
If they’re interested in Vaak than I’d ask about Kane lol. If Vaak was traded for Saad I’d lose it. I don’t know why, but Saad doesn’t really do it for me. Looks like a disappointment waiting to happen.
Saad is your type of player. Fast. Skilled. Not overly aggressive. Can score and skate, he isnt 22 but you would still like him
 

Fenian24

Registered User
Jun 14, 2010
10,352
13,419
To be honest I’d rather give Cehlarik a chance before trading for Saad. Why give up good assets for another 40-50 point winger? Also adds another $6M to the cap.
Because Saad is proven. A 25 goal scorer and Cehlarik is probably never going to play for Cassidy. He also didn't produce with Krecji when given the chance
 

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
Saad is your type of player. Fast. Skilled. Not overly aggressive. Can score and skate, he isnt 22 but you would still like him
My type of player? Lol. Unlike you, I really don’t have a type. I don’t care if they’re big or small, as long as they’re good.

Saad is interesting because he seems to show up in the postseason which I’m assuming we both want to see, so as long as he doesn’t cost one of the better prospects I’d be ok with it.

As for Cehlarik, he’s more of the type of player I think is missing right now in the lineup. Has some size and smarts, hard to knock off the puck. I think there’s too many small speedy guys that you like that get knocked off the puck too easily.
 

Fenian24

Registered User
Jun 14, 2010
10,352
13,419
My type of player? Lol. Unlike you, I really don’t have a type. I don’t care if they’re big or small, as long as they’re good.

Saad is interesting because he seems to show up in the postseason which I’m assuming we both want to see, so as long as he doesn’t cost one of the better prospects I’d be ok with it.

As for Cehlarik, he’s more of the type of player I think is missing right now in the lineup. Has some size and smarts, hard to knock off the puck. I think there’s too many small speedy guys that you like that get knocked off the puck too easily.
Yes I'm all about small, speed and skill. I would trade any prospect in the system for Miles Wood or Josh Anderson. That said there is no internal answer for the Bruins needs this season
 

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
Yes I'm all about small, speed and skill. I would trade any prospect in the system for Miles Wood or Josh Anderson. That said there is no internal answer for the Bruins needs this season
And that’s the difference between us, you overrate physicality. Trading Vaak who looks like a lock for the top 4 in the future for Wood who’s a good 3rd liner is crazy. I understand you prefer that type of player, but the value isn’t even close. Serious question, is Wood this season that much better than Wagner?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FanSince72

Fenian24

Registered User
Jun 14, 2010
10,352
13,419
And that’s the difference between us, you overrate physicality. Trading Vaak who looks like a lock for the top 4 in the future for Wood who’s a good 3rd liner is crazy. I understand you prefer that type of player, but the value isn’t even close. Serious question, is Wood this season that much better than Wagner?
Yes, based on skill his speed is far better than Wagners. Also if I have to hear from some how Heinen should be a 50 point player because of last year Wood should become a regular 20 goal scorer based on the same equation
 

Tampbear

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
1,662
389
Tampa
Cehlarik is exactly the kind of player the Bruins need, it would be really nice if he could fit into the lineup. Frederic also would provide exactly what this team needs right now, and could play himself onto the lineup this year. Frederic is my only completely off the board prospect, I wouldn't trade Studnicka unless part of a package for a superior young center, and I would trade Vaak unless for an elite young forward. Vaak is absolutely fantastic and could be a cornerstone defensive player for over a decade, but we already have a couple of guys that can play that role for us, but Pasta is our only young core forward at the moment, with Debrusk perhaps getting close. I would be alright with a top 6 consisting of something like Lauzon-McAvoy Krug-Carlo Gryz-Axel at some point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FanSince72

Tbrady12

Registered User
Oct 19, 2018
279
307
This is pretty strange timing. Nordstrom two weeks away and currently 8 d on the roster, so this wasn't necessary. Makes you think something else is coming.

Wouldn't be shocked it Edmonton grabs Cave and gives him a chance to head home. I don't think he clears.
 

chizzler

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 11, 2006
13,234
6,273
Cehlarik is exactly the kind of player the Bruins need, it would be really nice if he could fit into the lineup. Frederic also would provide exactly what this team needs right now, and could play himself onto the lineup this year. Frederic is my only completely off the board prospect, I wouldn't trade Studnicka unless part of a package for a superior young center, and I would trade Vaak unless for an elite young forward. Vaak is absolutely fantastic and could be a cornerstone defensive player for over a decade, but we already have a couple of guys that can play that role for us, but Pasta is our only young core forward at the moment, with Debrusk perhaps getting close. I would be alright with a top 6 consisting of something like Lauzon-McAvoy Krug-Carlo Gryz-Axel at some point.
Frederic isn’t ready. Vac is really good. Those two should not be traded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad