As Gavrikov signed an extension with LA, who would you rather have ?
Looks like he’s got NMCDoes Gavi have a NMC or anything?
Signing Gavi and keeping the LA Kings pick and a furure 2nd rounder is preferable.
Not really. I think that's the difference between a team in the playoffs and a team who finished second to last. I also think going to LA (a team on the rise) helped convince him to stay. If he went to Boston (a team who could collapse at any moment) he may not have resigned.Is anyone a little pissed off that Gary told the CBJ he wanted to test the free agent market, but then re-signed with LA instead of going to free agency?
Why not both?So question, is the result of this poll Provorov's play or the fact that Gavrikov wanted a different contract in the CBJ and left?
Actually the odd part to me is that the story was the issue wasn’t money but term and that Jarmo wanted a shorter deal than Gav preferred. And then Gav‘s camp pushes for a two year deal.Is anyone a little pissed off that Gary told the CBJ he wanted to test the free agent market, but then re-signed with LA instead of going to free agency?