Post-Game Talk: Game 5 - TWO U's TWO K's = 2 POINTS - BRUINS 3 NJ 0 F

[Bruinfanatic]

I feel like the injury had more to do with that.

What injury did he have in the playoffs,I don’t remember the team saying he had any ,Maybe I missed it ,I know we were all speculating that he had one.

 

[BMC]

What injury did he have in the playoffs,I don’t remember the team saying he had any ,Maybe I missed it ,I know we were all speculating that he had one.

His thumb was injured late regular season. Supposedly it was healed but I thought he favored it a lot

 

[JOKER 192]

I feel like the injury had more to do with that.

I'm still seeing him do it this year.

 

[Aussie Bruin]

His thumb was injured late regular season. Supposedly it was healed but I thought he favored it a lot

I think it was announced after the SCF that he'd re-aggravated it during the Columbus series.

I don't really see him avoiding contact at the moment. He's still occasionally trying to make cute or no-look passes at times when he shouldn't be in the defensive or neutral zones, but that's a separate issue and an error he's fortunately been making less in the last couple of games.

 

[bobbyorr04]

Have you ever been excited by a Bruins-Devils game ? Ever?

Not really

Devils play such a boring style of hockey, and are on my top ten **** list

I always love it when the B's beat them

 

[Mathews28]

Have you ever been excited by a Bruins-Devils game ? Ever?

yes! 1988 conference finals. Bruins won series 4-3. Great series.

This series also gave us the Schoenfeld-Koharsky incident.

 

[bobbyorr04]

Have you ever been excited by a Bruins-Devils game ? Ever?

I forgot about the 3rd round playoff series against the Devils in '88

...that series was pretty exciting

 

[GloryDaze4877]

i think kuhlman would be good for that line. we need someone for line 2. kuhlman is not a line 2 player. hes good for 3rd line.

Those 3 played together briefly in the first couple of games and I thought they looked very good.

This is my Top 9:

63, 37, 88, 74, 46, 83, 43, 13, 10

I don’t care how they mix them up, but those should be the guys. Put Heinen/Bjork with one of the first two lines if Kuhlman isn’t that guy. My preference would be:

63-37-43
74-46-88
10-13-83

 

[Spooner st]

I'm still seeing him do it this year.

He still does it, not as often though, we'll see when Bruins will play the more physical teams.
I really hope Pasta gets over that.

 

[Spooner st]

Those 3 played together briefly in the first couple of games and I thought they looked very good.

This is my Top 9:

63, 37, 88, 74, 46, 83, 43, 13, 10

I don’t care how they mix them up, but those should be the guys. Put Heinen/Bjork with one of the first two lines if Kuhlman isn’t that guy. My preference would be:

63-37-43
74-46-88
10-13-83

Imo MarchBerg need a shooter unfortunately neither Heinen/Bjork are.
I think Heinen would be best suited with Krejci or coyle.

 

[Glove Malfunction]

Exactly, last night looked like Gallagher ran over Binnington and the goal stood, meanwhile Krejci' s Skate barely touched the Avs goalie and it gets called back. You just know that there are mostly leafs and habs fans working those replays in Toronto and love sticking it to the Bruins. For anyone who thinks that they are totally unbiased, think again.

Gallagher's goal stood because the Blues didn't challenge. Not saying what would have happened in a challenge, but you can't say that's evidence of bias, since no review took place.

 

[sooshii]

yes! 1988 conference finals. Bruins won series 4-3. Great series.

This series also gave us the Schoenfeld-Koharsky incident.

You got me there!

 

[GloryDaze4877]

Imo MarchBerg need a shooter unfortunately neither Heinen/Bjork are.
I think Heinen would be best suited with Krejci or coyle.

Except that last year when Pasta was hurt, Heinen was great with 63 and 37 (both of whom shoot more when Pasta is not on the RW).

 

[bbfan419]

Gallagher's goal stood because the Blues didn't challenge. Not saying what would have happened in a challenge, but you can't say that's evidence of bias, since no review took place.

Well then the on ice officials can call it back as well, but they were in Montreal.