rt
The Kinder, Gentler Version
We’ve done the right things with the lead the last few games. They saw last night what happens when you don’t do those things. They got two points and a valuable lesson.
I'm not sure of Galchenyuk at C either, think he might be better on the wing, time will tell. If DVO were playing, Galchenyuk would be on the wing. Strome was better away from the puck last night. His feed to Cousins was money but we all know he can do that in the O zone. Its his play without the puck that I liked and that will keep him in the line up. Richardson has been our best all around C, good in all 3 zones. Stepan has been solid, does the little things.I missed the game last night, but I think he will be fine at C. Looking at the stat line, Strome had as assist, but was terrible in the dot. In fact, only Richardson was worth his weight in salt in the dot. I did see the hi lights and Strome's feed to Cousins which was nice as two players were on Strome. That shows what most have been saying that Strome needs someone who can finish. Again, if Strome can find that consistency he will be fine, if not, he will find himself in the press box.
Agree with this, we took our foot off the gas when we were up 3-0 against a high potent offense.We’ve done the right things with the lead the last few games. They saw last night what happens when you don’t do those things. They got two points and a valuable lesson.
Also, we see how the score impacts the shots. Which is part of the strange early season phenomenon that we were on the wrong end of.Agree with this, we took our foot off the gas when we were up 3-0 against a high potent offense.
Richardson and Strome were both very impressive last night. Richardson looks like he did before he broke his leg. Which is amazing given his age. Strome had some shifts that made him look like a 3rd overall pick. Stepan had a good game too. If Strome can continue to have games like this one, we’re going to have an okay center situation. Especially when Dvorak comes back.I'm not sure of Galchenyuk at C either, think he might be better on the wing, time will tell. If DVO were playing, Galchenyuk would be on the wing. Strome was better away from the puck last night. His feed to Cousins was money but we all know he can do that in the O zone. Its his play without the puck that I liked and that will keep him in the line up. Richardson has been our best all around C, good in all 3 zones. Stepan has been solid, does the little things.
The Flyers don't have a goaltender on their roster playing at an NHL level right now so it doesn't really matter who they call their starter at this point.
His speed this season has surprised the hell out of meTo be fair, they knew what kind of Richardson was. When he signed that deal he was still not playing at 100% because of that serious injury he had. He is though, playing better than I anticipated. It's funny how confidence and momentum can dictate how a player plays, and he's a vet.
Excellent post (dead on with your third sentence), but I disagree re: Lyubushkin.Carolina is big and fast. Wow. They are a good model for the yotes moving forward.
The biggest difference with the Yotes winning lately is they don't allow the 2-0's or breakaways like they were earlier in the year despite outshooting the opposition.
Raanta stole the game tonight but it's not that the Yotes played that bad it's just the Canes were really smoking tonight after falling behind.
I really like what Strome bought to the table. Maybe sitting him served a purpose. He's now not waiting for plays to develop. He's much more engaged. Yes he looks like Bambi on ice in the corners but put effort and his skill together and he will be okay.
Keller and Alex G did not look good tonight at all. But I'd give them some more time together.
Lyubushkin is really bad. He treats the puck like a hand grenade and his mobility is limited. get him out of there.
Grabner and Richardson combo is the best I've seen on the shorthand in a long time. It's one of those things that really help teams win. And I don't mean just scoring goals, that's a bonus, it's shutting down the oppositions power play. would be huge in the playoffs. Yes Playoffs.
They got on their heels, started with less aggression on the forecheck and that morphed into being overwhelmed in our end.I would say that giving up 50 shots is full blown panic. I didn't see the game but the way it sounds we were badly out played and if we made adjustments they didn't work. RT said the vets played good.
Big time learning curve here. Another crucial aspect that some may not consider is that it's also a big time gut check. Will this team have it in them to continually bear down? Aka: "It hurts to win" and they way this team has been playing, the way they need to play, is gonna hurt. Also begs the question: can they physically sustain the pace? It's possible that RT himself even made the call to try clogging the nuetral zone more, attempting to save some energy for the long haul.We’ve done the right things with the lead the last few games. They saw last night what happens when you don’t do those things. They got two points and a valuable lesson.
I would say that giving up 50 shots is full blown panic. I didn't see the game but the way it sounds we were badly out played and if we made adjustments they didn't work. RT said the vets played good.