Gabriel Landeskog vs Adam Larsson

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Sensnation55, Jan 15, 2011.

  1. Sensnation55

    Sensnation55 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you had to choose between them two on draft day which one would you choose? Take in considerations that its in terms of best player and not draft needs.
     
  2. ShawnTHW

    ShawnTHW @ShawnTHW

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2005
    Messages:
    8,953
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You NEVER pass up a future Lidstrom-like player.

















    EVER.
     
  3. YNWA14

    YNWA14 You'll Never Walk Alone

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    27,368
    Likes Received:
    493
    Trophy Points:
    124
    What? That's confusing -- because you always go by what your team needs. Taking draft needs out of the equation obviously Larsson is the player that people see more talent out of, but a lot of teams would be better off drafting Landeskog (Ottawa for example.)
     
  4. Barbadian91

    Barbadian91 Evgeny Kuznetsov

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,115
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ontario
    Ottawa should tank and draft Landeskog. it really depends on the team and wether they want a SAFE pick or are willing to take a chance.
     
  5. boredmale

    boredmale Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    36,568
    Likes Received:
    2,008
    Trophy Points:
    186
    it seems like there is 2-3 "Lidstrom-like" players every draft, along with 1-2 "Yzerman-types". lol
     
  6. Nabokov20

    Nabokov20 Karlsson for Chuck

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ottawa
    Larsson
     
  7. Riddick

    Riddick Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,645
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    96
    who ALWAYS goes by team need?? i was under the impression it was BPA..ALWAYS. and if two players are judged to have EXACT same potential, then you could go for team need...
     
  8. ShawnTHW

    ShawnTHW @ShawnTHW

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2005
    Messages:
    8,953
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Last year's draft not one person resembled Lidstrom, in my opinion. Maybe for other but not me.

    Larsson is a can't miss player at this point and its always better for a team to build from the net out.
     
  9. ShawnTHW

    ShawnTHW @ShawnTHW

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2005
    Messages:
    8,953
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So lets say, hypothetically that the first 4 picks go like this:

    1. Larsson
    2. Couturier
    3. RNH
    4. Murphy

    and you have 5th overall. Your team is in desperate need of a future defenseman that they can build the franchise around. You are trying to tell me that your team would bypass Landeskog and pick Siemens or Musil? Somehow I HIGHLY doubt that. It is ALWAYS BPA, especially in the first round. Teams focus on needs in the 3rd round on...usually, but never in the first.
     
  10. Larsson will be wearing the red-white and black of the NJ Devils next year... book it ;)
     
  11. Exactly and the reason is pretty obvious... The players you are drafting this summer will probably make a impact on your team in 3 or 4 years from now and god knows what will happen between the draft and the next 3 years.
     
  12. mindmasher

    mindmasher Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Home Page:
    What in the world are you smoking? If we are talking about 1st OA every pro scout employed in the NHL has repeated the same things over and over: Best Pick Available, all the time.

    Go look at these goaltenders drafted in the lottery positions, all three of which were not ranked (as far as I remember) as highly as they went. MAF vs. Eric Staal? Dipietro vs. Heatley? Lehtonen vs. Bouwmeester?
     
  13. Haute Couturier

    Haute Couturier Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    I don't think there is ever a can't miss player when it comes to defenseman. It's also a long shot for anyone to have a career similar to Lidstrom.
     
  14. ItsTheBGB

    ItsTheBGB Borusse!!

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,366
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, AB
    So then we take Seguin over Hall.

    No thanks.

    BPA baby.
     
  15. Beerfish

    Beerfish Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    15,317
    Likes Received:
    330
    Trophy Points:
    154
    You mean like Victor Hedman?

    Of course no one would pass on Larsson if you knew he was going to be Lidstrom but how many lidstroms have you seen? None.
     
  16. Vinegar Strokes

    Vinegar Strokes Dirty Ducks

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,515
    Likes Received:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Software Project Manager
    Location:
    Fort Collins
    You say this as if Hedman has reached his potential. Hedman's a good 5-10 years from reaching whatever potential he may have.
     
  17. joe89

    joe89 #5

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    20,210
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Hedman's style of play has never been like Lidstrom, but Larsson's is pretty close.
     
  18. Vasilevskiy

    Vasilevskiy I've many surnames

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    12,499
    Likes Received:
    369
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Barcelona
    Hedman's still 20 and is getting better with every game, if he keeps developing and improves his physical game he will be a franchise player.
     
  19. cokeandrumiemi

    cokeandrumiemi .... gonna be a long few years

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2009
    Messages:
    4,616
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Montreal
    Honestly I liked Landeskog more the larsson and I'd take him if it was me
     
  20. Gobo

    Gobo Stop looking Gare

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,440
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    54
    Occupation:
    Nothing
    :shakehead
     
  21. Rare Jewel

    Rare Jewel Patience

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Messages:
    15,274
    Likes Received:
    377
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    Leaf Land
    Landeskog.
     
  22. SDig14

    SDig14 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    Messages:
    10,717
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Edmonton, AB
    The problem with defensemen is that you often have to wait until they are 25+ years of age to really find out what their ceiling ends up being...not many guys come in and play like Doughty in their teens and early twenties

    It could happen for Hedman, but franchise player is a pretty tough accomplishment for a d-man, especially when you already have a franchise player
     
  23. Trottier

    Trottier Very Random

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    29,232
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Marketing Executive
    Location:
    San Diego
    Home Page:
    So true.

    Your impression is correct. Because of this...

    There are exceptions, of course (and moreso in recent years). But typically, a GM does not expect an 18 year old to step in from Day One and "fill" a current major hole on his NHL roster. For example, Larsson may be "can't miss" (wish I had a dime for every time that phrase is casually thrown around) and becomes the most talented dman in NJD's organization the moment he is drafted. Even so, Lou will not be expecting him to give him #1 dman, 30 quality minutes in every game situation starting next October. Unfair to the player and unwise planning.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2011
  24. Devils1029

    Devils1029 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    54
    Landeskog is a potential top 6 forward with intangibles, Larsson s a potential top pairing d-man...um..I'm going for the d-man...

    but....if NJ loses the lottery and picks 2nd and Larsson is gone, I'd consider Landeskog over Courturier or RNH....
     
  25. Nullus Reverentia

    Nullus Reverentia Hic Sunt Dracones

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    19,408
    Likes Received:
    380
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Occupation:
    Helium-3 Space Pirate
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    You sell Landeskog short with the vauge description. Larssons a potential top pairing defesemen, but Landeskog is a potential first line Selke winning winger.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"