This terrible captain didn't "take" his team to game 7 of the finals. He no-showed the entire playoffs with the exception of the SJ series. How you give him credit for that I have no idea.
Best player in the first round where we lost? He was outplayed by Dustin Brown who took over the series.
Sedin had a great offensive showing for two regular seasons, and a bunch of good seasons (not absolutely dominant, but very good). Just because Henrik and Daniel have had some good regular seasons doesn't mean Henrik is a good captain. This is a very mentally weak team. Far too often this team doesn't put in the effort over a full 60 minutes. Far too often this team completely no-shows the playoffs. Far too often the offense in the playoffs disappears. Henrik's leadership in terms of his ability to lead a hockey team is questionable.
I'm on my mobile so I won't be able to dissect your post entirely.
Firstly Henrik Sedin who's the captain and best player of the Canucks yes did lead his team to the finals he had the most points of any Canuck players, how can you say we made it there in spite of him? It's plain idiotic. If anything we made it there in spite of Luongo, but lets not make this a Luongo thread.
Secondaly it's hilarious how you can just scoff at Henrik's 112 point season and just be meh about it. He won the Hart Trophy that year as the most valuable player to his team this year, but let me guess the Canucks won the division in spite of Henrik that year as well. No Henriks not only had "2 good regular seasons" he's consistently been among the league leaders in points year in and year out. He's probably top 5 in points in points since the lockout[2005-2006]
You can defend Luongo yet call The Sedins notorious chokers. It honestly puzzles my mind the Sedins' have scored the most playoff points for this team for the past 4 years, yet there "chokers" Yet the goalie who is prone to have at least 1 or 2 meltdowns in a playoff series is dubbed as a saviour.