SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 52,115
- 33,478
Looking ahead a year, if Andersen wants more than 5.5 I think we turn to New York (or New York via Seattle) for a goalie. Both teams are going to be hurting cap wise and will need to shed a goalie.
demko/ Campbell could work.
I think Freddie won’t get. A raise
For Braccos trade value, if he can be traded at all I would be surprised.
Why pay for a guy not even in a teams top 30, who is about to become a UFA (assuming Leafs dont qualify him) unless your giving back a contract for a young player you have also given up on/a guy you want off the books.
Maybe a cash strapped team with a large AHL contract they want gone. For the Leafs, if its a guy who is a bit older but could fill in as a depth move could be nice.
Matt Tennyson from NJD, a 30 AHL RHD who has played a few NHL games, but is owed 350k in the minors they may want gone if other young D have passed him.
Same goes for Michael Chaput, a 28 y.o C who has bounced between the AHL and NHL a few times, owed 300k in the minors.
I mean unless it came out that he had some kind of damning personal issue (i.e. he was responsible for the cocaine thing in Kitchener), then no team is going to want touch him no matter what. Outside of that though, the Leafs are not going to give him away for free (or even cheap). Why would they when he is at least a very valuable AHL player with a ton of upside? Worst case they put him on waivers and lose him that way.
We can get better guys than Tennyson and Chaput in UFA, so it's a waste of money and a contract on our part. We'd be better off just non-tendering him.
I think if we are looking at a trade partner, we could either attach him to a trade with a guy like Johnsson or Kerfoot, or we could look at a prospect swap like trading him for Henrik Borgstrom from Florida, who is also not on the Panthers' return to play roster and has struggled despite being a former 1st round pick. He's a large center with skill and IQ, which is right up our alley, is the same age (both 97' born players) and he is waiver eligible next year too. However, he may end up in the KHL next year so he would be a longer term investment (but we get to hold onto his rights at least), while Bracco would be someone who can step in directly to try and replace Dadonov and Hoffman on the RW for Florida. Since they wanted to cut a ton of salary even before Covid-19, they probably have a lot more interest in guys like Bracco than when they traded Malgin for Marchment (they are probably having some regrets right about now, since Marchment is not on their return to play roster either)... And Bracco has more upside/skill than Malgin. We may give them a conditional pick in case Bracco is lost due to waivers, since we'd be able to keep Borgstrom's rights if he is in the KHL, however it is a situation that works extremely well for both teams.
I usually trust CJ's views on how the Leafs view/value guys.
I hope your right, id love to get something decent for him, im just leaning more towards the 'will take anything' at this point.
Like, did he ask for a trade and now is refusing to play? Is he unfit for whatever reason? Do the Leafs not see him as better than the other guys (which is fully possible)?
Who knows
I usually trust CJ's views on how the Leafs view/value guys.
I hope your right, id love to get something decent for him, im just leaning more towards the 'will take anything' at this point.
Like, did he ask for a trade and now is refusing to play? Is he unfit for whatever reason? Do the Leafs not see him as better than the other guys (which is fully possible)?
Who knows
I dont think hed bring back anything of note. Either a mid to late pick or he'll be a + in a bigger trade.
I think there are a few teams looking for skilled winger depth who may have interest that some type of trade could/will happen
I'm not even sure Bracco will be qualified at this point.
For what reason, unless you believe there are off-ice/professionalism issues that far outweigh what he brings on the ice? It literally makes no sense otherwise.
The team has tacitly established that he'll never play another game for this organization, have failed to move him insofar and his contract spot could be put to better use. I mean, I guess he could be traded for a 7th or a nothing prospect, but there will be better players available in October given the current climate.
If I am looking for a vet to plug into a depth role for cheap, then yes. If I am looking for guys with upside and the potential to provide good value for their contract, then not really.
He is worth more than a 7th or a nothing prospect (or a free contract spot) because he can fill a huge role for the Marlies. We can get a vet to do the same I guess, but they are probably not better players and definitely have less of a chance of being anything of value for the Leafs.
Leaving him off of the roster does not really mean anything. There is no reason to believe the Leafs will randomly get rid of him without some off-ice issue pushing their decision. His play certain does not warrant it, because he was still one of the Marlies' better forwards last year.
Nope we're done with that. It was fine when we were rebuilding, or like last year needed to get close to the cap to accrue money in case Marner was out until December.I think we should look into trading for some Ltir contracts like Kesler or Seabrook. Only if they are basically retired.
IMO, it all depends on what the + is, and how long the contract is.Nope we're done with that. It was fine when we were rebuilding, or like last year needed to get close to the cap to accrue money in case Marner was out until December.
Going forward those contracts would do nothing for us except give us zero flexibility to add at the trade deadline.
Yup, deep pockets are an asset too. consider all options. Well said.IMO, it all depends on what the + is, and how long the contract is.
If its a 1 year LTIR, and they are willing to give up a good piece, that piece may be bigger than what we may be able to add at the deadline, why not?
I.e. 1 year LTRI guy (preferably who's contract is not insured) + good prospect or pic for a AHL tweener, could be a big value.
We gave up a 1st for Marleau to be bought out, I dont know how to extrapolate how to compare that value if its LTIR deadspace.
Is it similar? Two seconds? ... A guy like Athanasiou? Alec Martinez? Brendan Dillon @50%? Dylan Demello? All went last year for somewhere between two 2nds and 1 3rd.
If you can add a decent piece like that WITHOUT having to give up something from the team, may be worth it.
IMO, it all depends on what the + is, and how long the contract is.
If its a 1 year LTIR, and they are willing to give up a good piece, that piece may be bigger than what we may be able to add at the deadline, why not?
I.e. 1 year LTRI guy (preferably who's contract is not insured) + good prospect or pic for a AHL tweener, could be a big value.
We gave up a 1st for Marleau to be bought out, I dont know how to extrapolate how to compare that value if its LTIR deadspace.
Is it similar? Two seconds? ... A guy like Athanasiou? Alec Martinez? Brendan Dillon @50%? Dylan Demello? All went last year for somewhere between two 2nds and 1 3rd.
If you can add a decent piece like that WITHOUT having to give up something from the team, may be worth it.
As long as you canThe best thing for us, is to be able to accrue cap space within season, in order to have the room to fill any holes or depth we feel we need at the deadline.
If the Leafs aren't below the cap for the beginning of this upcoming season, then trading for an LTIR isn't going to help that in any way.As long as you can
a) use it
b) it doesnt cost you too many assets for the future.
Im not comfortable spending picks or prospects on pure rentals. If its for a longer term piece im more comforatable.
I guess the value proposition, to me is:
LTIR contract + asset they are trading to move it, but not addition.
or
Space at the TDL to improve helps fill a hole, but it costs an asset.
And to have space, we need to be below the cap to start the year which I dont know is possible.
I'm not even sure Bracco will be qualified at this point.
The act doesnt create cap space, your right.If the Leafs aren't below the cap for the beginning of this upcoming season, then trading for an LTIR isn't going to help that in any way.
As long as you can
a) use it
b) it doesnt cost you too many assets for the future.
Im not comfortable spending picks or prospects on pure rentals. If its for a longer term piece im more comforatable.
I guess the value proposition, to me is:
LTIR contract + asset they are trading to move it, but not addition.
or
Space at the TDL to improve helps fill a hole, but it costs an asset.
And to have space, we need to be below the cap to start the year which I dont know is possible.