Lunatik
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2012
- 56,235
- 8,372
And there's nothing "wrong" with an offer sheet, either.I could see them doing it to Marner. Honestly though the Leafs didn’t do anything wrong to the Isles. But maybe Lou isn’t happy with how things went down.
And there's nothing "wrong" with an offer sheet, either.
But a UFA like Tavares going from the Islanders to the Leafs for nothing is a massive unbalancing of league power. It almost feels like it's not supposed to happen. So trying to swing it back the other way would be smart.
Hmmm....
On and off can be just 2-3 years, it makes no sense for us to acquire a LW that doesn't skate as well as he used to. It's pretty obviously the Oilers.The full article mentions that the team has has been good off and on. This rules out Vancouver, and edmonton has only been "on" once. I can't see winnipeg going after him.
Honestly, it sounds like Calgary. But why would the flames target a bottom 6 LW?
The full article mentions that the team has has been good off and on. This rules out Vancouver, and edmonton has only been "on" once. I can't see winnipeg going after him.
Honestly, it sounds like Calgary. But why would the flames target a bottom 6 LW?
The full article mentions that the team has has been good off and on. This rules out Vancouver, and edmonton has only been "on" once. I can't see winnipeg going after him.
Honestly, it sounds like Calgary. But why would the flames target a bottom 6 LW?