There is zero chance that is what his "mandate" isBergevin making sure his cap space remains protected. What if Karlsson really wants to sign here and Bergevin wants to hold on to money in the bank because, in reality, that's his real mandate?
There is zero chance that is what his "mandate" isBergevin making sure his cap space remains protected. What if Karlsson really wants to sign here and Bergevin wants to hold on to money in the bank because, in reality, that's his real mandate?
Why isn’t there pressure? As a business, it’s clearly not anywhere peak efficiency.
The potential income and equity boost is far greater than the $10 million saved. So I wouldn’t say it is covered.
With the valuation, the team has to be well into the black such that $8 million isn’t that big a deal, especially if you consider that diminution of brand value with a losing team.
If the team is winning, Molson can sell anything with a CH on it. He can’t do that with a losing team and a moribund brand.
I would also argue that if the team is strong, rights fees are far more lucrative.
Vegas and Seattle are not sustainable and repeatable events. They are windfalls.
Well, we'll know the answer to that question July 2nd.There is zero chance that is what his "mandate" is
I guess we will see if you are right when July 1st rolls around.There is zero chance that is what his "mandate" is
All comes down to his hunger to improve and getting physically stronger. He's a smart kid with great vision.
So why do they retain a gm that has seen his team make it to one round of the playoffs in the last 4 years? Why is he able to still be in charge with such poor prospect drafting and development under his watch? Why does he stay under the cap for two years in a row and add only journeyman players at the tdl when the team needed more than that? I'll tell you how, no pressure! How much playoff success have we enjoyed since the Molson family and their partners bought the team from Gilette in 2009? I agree with you that there would be more value with a winning team but it also entails more risk as well. I am of the belief that they are content with running the team on idle while still making plenty of money.
You think a $ 6-10 million expense constitutes risk to a business that is worth $1.2 billion and has doubled in value on the decade since acquisition?
From a risk management perspective, it is your firm and unassailable belief that the saving of that money is more important than the potential upside in income and equity which you acknowledge comes with winning? That’s how razor thin the margins are?
Why are they paying a coach $5 million when they can pay one $2 million? Why is this an acceptable “risk”?
He’s not signing with Vancouver because they aren’t giving him a NMC. He wants to stay out West. So he’s not leaving for the East without one. By the time expansion comes he’ll be 35. He’s not healthy now, imagine then. So you’d have to keep an injury prone 35 year old.
They are better off getting the more mobile Gardiner who is younger and won’t necessarily need a NMC
But he was more than happy to overpay for AlznerHe's just not spending it to anyone. Bergevin did not wanted to keep Markov for 6M$ (2 years) or Radulov for over 6.5M$ for 5 years.
Alzner and Byron make as much as Karlsson will makeBut he was more than happy to overpay for Alzner
Alzner and Byron make as much as Karlsson will make
Alzner and Byron make as much as Karlsson will make
Or at least Alzner, Byron, and Weise.
I wonder if the assets Byron brings back + a 2nd + some combination of prospects involving Ikonen, Oloufsson and other like prospects is enough to entice a team or two to take on the Alzner and Weise contracts.
Hes a 30 years old fourth liner making close to 4 millionsWhy bring up Byron he's signed to a great contract? Alzner is 3.6m in wasted space I'll give you that.
Hes a 30 years old fourth liner making close to 4 millions
Closer to 3 than 4.. hes at 3.4m. For a 20 goal scorer that's a bargain. And a premium PKer
He's a quality player, but the player with value and a high cap hit, and who's over 30, I'd sacrifice to make cap and roster room for a quality ufa.
Why then are they keeping a GM that has not been good at his job? If they don't care about petty millions then why not fire him and go out and say that money is not an issue and we will pay what it takes to get a GM that we feel gives us a winning chance?You think a $ 6-10 million expense constitutes risk to a business that is worth $1.2 billion and has doubled in value on the decade since acquisition?
From a risk management perspective, it is your firm and unassailable belief that the saving of that money is more important than the potential upside in income and equity which you acknowledge comes with winning? That’s how razor thin the margins are?
Why are they paying a coach $5 million when they can pay one $2 million? Why is this an acceptable “risk”?
Bergevin making sure his cap space remains protected. What if Karlsson really wants to sign here and Bergevin wants to hold on to money in the bank because, in reality, that's his real mandate?
I don't have the same agent/player inside info as you apparently do, so can't really comment on what it is he wants. Like any other UFA, he'll land wherever he sees the best fit for himself, of course.
Why then are they keeping a GM that has not been good at his job? If they don't care about petty millions then why not fire him and go out and say that money is not an issue and we will pay what it takes to get a GM that we feel gives us a winning chance?
Why go out at the deadline and get journeyman players on cheap contracts when the team was desperately in need of scoring and power play help? We missed the playoffs by two points while being 9-10 million under the cap. We have increased in value incredibly all while being a middle of the road franchise so I don't think that the pressure is there to try and be better.
I'd argue we don't need that cap space this year. Next year Mason and Weise are off the books. We can sign quality UFA without moving Byron
Edit: and peca. And at that point I'd trade alzner 50% retained.. and only Domi to sign