^My realtime reaction was that the Oilers would not be the same without Coffey. That Simpson was not an adequate compensation in trade for losing Coffey. If the internet had existed I would have filled it up.
However Simpson so complimented the Oilers 2nd line that our offense was unstoppable in the playoffs. Whatever happened in regular season is inconsequential. The Glory years Oilers were always better in the playoffs as you know. It wasn't until then that you would see their real game. For instance a lot of Boston and Philly fans figured they had our number based on regular season contests. With that Oilers team you never knew what you were facing until they notched up that playoff intensity.
I don't agree with you that it was redhot goaltending alone in the 87 SC final. Sure a considerable factor, but the Flyers settled into the series reasonably well. I don't think the series as a whole was the Oilers best work. I actually think it was the poorest overall performance of any of the 5 finals wins. The Oilers allowed the Flyers back in the series. Should have sealed it in 5. 7th game also going down to the wire in nailbiting fashion. Basically everybody in the rink was Nervous until Anderson iced it with minutes left on what was a weak goal let in by Hextall.
Again it comes down to whether one considers players in lineup or actual body of work in determining the best ever team. To me the actual results need to be considered. Like you I was not prepared at the time to think the Oilers could ever be more dominant without Coffey. But they were in 88. They were untouchable in that postseason. So much so it was almost boring at the time.
btw. heh, I am far from alone in thinking the 85 and 88 Oilers teams were the best.;
Top 10 Greatest NHL Teams