Wow, youre condescending!
who are you scratching consistently for Johnson?
Literally all that Johnson was 'top 6' among your current DMen in was staying healthy. Schultz missed 60 games, he was basically a late-season addition. Gubranson was a late season addition. Pettersson was acquired during the season. Maata and Letang missed ~40 games between the two of them. How many games last season were all of those guys available? I am willing to wager it was not many. Who is the one not all that interested in the truth???
Johnson is your 7th best DMan and either he is deployed that way, or someone with an even more expensive contract is your 7th DMan (unless you wanna sit Pettersson until someone gets hurt)... or you trade a better DMan/ one who *doesnt* spend the last season and a half of their contract above the age of 35
You guys have almost no cap space and are at a time when being competitive is imperative. If you dont think Johnson is an albatross on the Pens roster, that's your prerogative but **** with that condescending crap. In an ideal world, he is the first player they move. I am not the one who proposed trading a first to get rid of Johnson so clearly I'm not the only one who thinks so. I dont think it would take a 1st but if you think he has any kind of value you're dreaming.
A) I wouldn't be if I didn't have to repeat myself 10 times over the same simple shit. But alas here we are.
B) Based on the POs, and what our board has been saying for the past few months since the TD, Maatta. Ideally both would go, but realistically Rutherford won't move him (which is different then him wanting to move him).
C) Every one of our blueliner's were healthy all POs long. And while Johnson did sit the first game for Maatta (hence your constant blithering about "scratched for 2 straight playoffs"), Maatta was the healthy scratch for games 2, 3 and 4 in favor of Johnson. That (as I've said before) should tell you a lot, but apparently it doesn't so here we are.
D) I've never once said he had "value" in the sense that we'd get anything back for him - just that it wouldn't cost us anything to move him. In fact I've specifically said that we wouldn't get shit back... but that circles back to the part where some people struggling with their reading comprehension.
E) It's not about what I think. In a world where Alzner gets 4.625m, Girardi and Hainsey get 3m and Stone gets 3.5m, JJ at 3.25m isn't an issue. Doesn't mean it's great, but 3.25m for a 5/6D who could play up if needed is nothing in today's cap world. And it's certainly not the "albatross" that you're spending all this time trying to suggest it is.
Again, you don't have to like the contract or the player (I certainly don't), but at least grasp some understanding of why players get paid like they do in the NHL and what the financial landscape of the NHL actually is... because it's pretty clear this is something you're not understanding.