We lost to the eventual champions 3 years in a row. Why does it matter what round we face the champions in? This is the same level of analysis as counting cup rings to determine a player's skill. You're basically arguing that losing to LA in the 3rd round would have meant we had a better team than losing to LA in the 1st round. Brutal even for you.
In the last playoff year he wanted to rebuild because he recognized the team was done after a solid 4 year window with 3 losses to the eventual champions, a finals appearance, and multiple President's.
The f*** you talking about?
"Losing to L.A. in the 3rd round...blah, blah, blah?
After the spring of 2011 it was a gong show, pure and simple, some bloody plan that is. "Hey, Dude you've failed your drivers test 3 times in a row, but I like your plan"
All of the Gillis/Canuck peer group at the time continued with some success here and there post 2011 except the Gillis plan, which trended to awfulness until he was fired. Great plan. The Kings, Bruins, Blackhawks all continued to make it back to Lord Stanley, while Mr. One Kick at the Can faded into obscurity. Lovely plan. Where can I get a plan like this?