Iron Balls McGinty
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2005
- 8,604
- 6,459
I say we fire Stevie Nicks and her damned tambourine.So we're getting rid of the guy who plays the cow bell? I would hate to see him go.
I say we fire Stevie Nicks and her damned tambourine.So we're getting rid of the guy who plays the cow bell? I would hate to see him go.
The Minnesota comment wasn’t the reason he was fired. Just a part of the saga. He didn’t always polish the turds the front office was dropping.I don't recall that incident; I had always thought he was let go since he was making a big deal about the Jackets clinching their first ever playoff spot when the rest of the broadcast team was being told not to make a big deal of it that night.
I say we fire Stevie Nicks and her damned tambourine.
I can see him with an "A" for the exact reason you state, the on-ice leadership, playing the right way. I don't see him as being vocal enough to get the "C", but I have no idea what he is like in the room.I'll go out on a limb and say that Bjorkstrand might make a good captain, at least as far as on-ice leadership goes. He always plays the right way.
Huge Foligno fan here. But it's time to move on.
Some bands should get together again. Most should not. The CBJ band needs new vocals, percussion and guitars.
I just noticed something so I'm going to share this graph of Foligno's contract one more time.
The idea that Foligno "got paid based on an absurd career year" is deeply ingrained here, and JFresh himself says something that sounds similar, but it is in fact very different to say he "got paid well following a career year". Look at what the graph actually shows. Foligno put up a WAR of 4.5 that year, an astounding figure. Yet the Cap-hit expected WAR is under 2.0, i.e. his cap hit was much closer to his performance during the contract than it was to his career year.
That Foligno "got paid well following a career year" would be a true statement but he didn't get paid on the expectation that he would be putting up 4.5 WAR and 70+ pts every year. That's like $8m-$9m per.
I just noticed something so I'm going to share this graph of Foligno's contract one more time.
The idea that Foligno "got paid based on an absurd career year" is deeply ingrained here, and JFresh himself says something that sounds similar, but it is in fact very different to say he "got paid well following a career year". Look at what the graph actually shows. Foligno put up a WAR of 4.5 that year, an astounding figure. Yet the Cap-hit expected WAR is under 2.0, i.e. his cap hit was much closer to his performance during the contract than it was to his career year.
That Foligno "got paid well following a career year" would be a true statement but he didn't get paid on the expectation that he would be putting up 4.5 WAR and 70+ pts every year. That's like $8m-$9m per.
I just noticed something so I'm going to share this graph of Foligno's contract one more time.
The idea that Foligno "got paid based on an absurd career year" is deeply ingrained here, and JFresh himself says something that sounds similar, but it is in fact very different to say he "got paid well following a career year". Look at what the graph actually shows. Foligno put up a WAR of 4.5 that year, an astounding figure. Yet the Cap-hit expected WAR is under 2.0, i.e. his cap hit was much closer to his performance during the contract than it was to his career year.
That Foligno "got paid well following a career year" would be a true statement but he didn't get paid on the expectation that he would be putting up 4.5 WAR and 70+ pts every year. That's like $8m-$9m per.
Three posts later someone will be like ‘he was overpaid based on a career year...’
Source that says Bjorkstrand market value is 10 million plus causes me to be a bit skeptical about Foligno being fairly paid.
Source that says Bjorkstrand market value is 10 million plus causes me to be a bit skeptical about Foligno being fairly paid.
I just noticed something so I'm going to share this graph of Foligno's contract one more time.
The idea that Foligno "got paid based on an absurd career year" is deeply ingrained here, and JFresh himself says something that sounds similar, but it is in fact very different to say he "got paid well following a career year". Look at what the graph actually shows. Foligno put up a WAR of 4.5 that year, an astounding figure. Yet the Cap-hit expected WAR is under 2.0, i.e. his cap hit was much closer to his performance during the contract than it was to his career year.
That Foligno "got paid well following a career year" would be a true statement but he didn't get paid on the expectation that he would be putting up 4.5 WAR and 70+ pts every year. That's like $8m-$9m per.
Jarmo has been the one gradually trading/letting go of that legacy. I could understand it for a while - we could afford to lose a little grit to get some talent. But we stopped being flush with character a while ago and now we might just be in dire need of it.
Boone Jenner.
If he does though it needs to be much much less than his current salary.
Call me crazy but we've seen teams pull off quick turn arounds before. I think the Jackets need a makeover not a brickover.
Foligno uses present tense a lot in that interview talking about Columbus/the cannon. Kinda interesting. Maybe means nothing. Normally guys will always use past tense.
They both are average players at best, who will be overpaid. No thanks, I’m okay without them.Uhh, well, yeah. Why is that even a question? Same with Savard. Both should be brought back.
Or are they just good enough for the teams that are apparently way better than the CBJ team, and yet, not good enough to help the CBJ team against those teams?!?
I can’t follow the idiotic mindsets anymore.