LOL that is pretty funny to read! Starts on page 6 in "around the league" for those interested!Quick reminder that there are 10 pages of HFOil discussing tonight's game
LOL that is pretty funny to read! Starts on page 6 in "around the league" for those interested!Quick reminder that there are 10 pages of HFOil discussing tonight's game
Who the hell do you call up from the Heat if Smith is injured? Schneider?
1) We replaced Gulutzan with Peters. His coaching is so obviously elite every single game. Honestly think he's one of the best in the entire league, I mean this was one of his worst coached games of the season and he was still able to secure a two goal comeback win..
2) We replaced Dougie "volume shooter" Hamilton with Brodie and Andersson, who are very intelligent and creative offensive RD, and in Brodie's case he enables Giordano rather than limiting him. They're also both much better at being useful when the net is empty.
I'll eat some crow on the Hamilton trade too, mostly didn't like Ferland being in it and thought it was kind of risky betting on Lindholm and Hanifin.
This I think has been the single biggest difference maker for the Flames this year. Gulutzan seemed like an ok strategist, an intelligent talker, a decent people person. Peters I think knows how to command respect from his team and set expectations for them, have them on their toes, have them in places to succeed. Especially with the young players the Flames have had come in, and especially especially the young defenseman on the roster.
I'll eat some crow on the Hamilton trade too, mostly didn't like Ferland being in it and thought it was kind of risky betting on Lindholm and Hanifin. They have really delivered so far surrounded by better players.
Lindholm.Something is different with the Flames this year.
Gulutzan is a charlatan, as far as head coaches are concerned at least. I've seen them in every field I've worked in. He can keep up appearances, and fool casual observers that he can coach a hockey team competently, but the difference between him and Peters, and every other coach in the league, is so absolutely night and day.
Lindholm.
Like, adding a PPG forward boost a forward group. It makes a team that was really bad at scoring a whole lot better. Who knows how long that will last though, given what he was in Carolina. If the whole first line blow the second half again, we might have a repeat from last year.
Hopefully the only trend that flip is Smith's 88% save pct.
I don't think that's it. I mean, of course that's great, but last year we had Versteeg essentially giving us what Lindholm has on the PP and Ferland giving us more than what Lindholm has at ES.
Didn't see this before - I never leave before the final buzzer. This is why.Hope you guys stayed until the end
The salt levels in the Oilers board is off the charts. "refs were biased tonight, Flames gifted PP after PP", "Flames with horse shoes always coming back it's not sustainable, they aren't very good".
Like, if you didn't watch the game and made these ignorant comments it's whatever, but they clearly watch the games, so their knowledge of hockey is just, well, poor. Flames get PP after PP because they have the puck for 95% of the time and are skating. Flames come back because they dominate games, but don't get rewarded until late in games.
Jealousy is a hell of an emotion.
Well, I think for Versteeg it was more his injury history combined with his age. He was quite useful (especially as a PP specialist). I mean, he played 93 games in the last 2 seasons combined. He would still be a useful depth forward, if he wasn't injured so heavily by the more physical nature of the NHL (over the European leagues).Versteeg was useless...that's why he is out of the NHL now
No word on it yet. Burkie is speculating injury.
Depends who you ask.Was out tonight and unable to watch. Saw a bit at dinner and followed the box score. 4 goals against in 6 2p shots wasn't enjoyable to see. I saw 5-3 down w 2 min left, assumed it was done and then see twitter going nuts 5 min later. I just finished the 9min extended game highlights on YouTube that i often watch. What a fantastic comeback. Seems we earned it.
While we weren't great, we still outplayed them. The whole game was a gongshow with turnovers (both teams seemed to be losing possession of the puck at least once per shift). Smith let in some really bad goals (like that shot from the blue line that was closer to a dump-in), but at least one of the goals (the Sanheim goal) was actually a pretty nice one. The goal Rittich let in, it's hard to fault him. A breakdown on our PP giving a high-scoring center (Couturier) a shorthanded breakaway for what would have been the second shot he faced. Our PP was god awful, and Stolarz made a lot of incredible saves as well. Overall, it was one of those games where it should have been a 2-1 game for us from the play, but somehow we blew it defensively (combined with Smith struggling, possibly playing injured? He never even got back to the bench in the third or OT).Depends who you ask.
Based on the highlights and what I heard on the radio, it sounded like we didn't necessarily deserve the comeback, but we didn't really deserve to be behind in the first place.
Well, I think for Versteeg it was more his injury history combined with his age. He was quite useful (especially as a PP specialist). I mean, he played 93 games in the last 2 seasons combined. He would still be a useful depth forward, if he wasn't injured so heavily by the more physical nature of the NHL (over the European leagues).
But I agree, Lindholm has been a difference maker for us, as has Hanifin (who has real good chemistry with Hamonic, and allowing Brodie to play his more comfortable side, and rekindle the Brodano pairing).