Proposal: Flames/Canucks

[JuniorNelson]

Markstrom is intriguing. I like him for playoff hockey. I think he's a guy that gets hot in the playoffs. Watch him in traffic. He'll be unfazed. I want to keep him for that potential, even though playoffs are not certain.

 

[Horse McHindu]

Juolevi + Vancouver 1st for Hanifin + Calgary 1st is something that I would strongly consider, but I think both fanbases would be angry with this deal.

 

[CaptainCrunch67]

Juolevi + Vancouver 1st for Hanifin + Calgary 1st is something that I would strongly consider, but I think both fanbases would be angry with this deal.

Calgary might do it because that Vancouver pick is likely to be a high lottery pick, though I doubt they would do it because Hanifin is far better then Juolevi and it hurts the Flames win now stance.

 

[Baxterman]

Juolevi + Vancouver 1st for Hanifin + Calgary 1st is something that I would strongly consider, but I think both fanbases would be angry with this deal.

No thanks.

I think that Canucks pick will be high but there are enough otgerbad teams that it could end up being 6-8 and I would rather Hanifin than that.

Plus without Hanifin our defense is weak so our pick could be in the 10-13 range.

No interest in Juolevi at all so he is just s throw in for me.

 

[blankall]

The OP deal is Calgary giving up assets for cap dumps, which is not happening.

Calgary bailing on Hanifin would send an awful message.

 

[Tkachuky]

No thanks.

I think that Canucks pick will be high but there are enough otgerbad teams that it could end up being 6-8 and I would rather Hanifin than that.

Plus without Hanifin our defense is weak so our pick could be in the 10-13 range.

No interest in Juolevi at all so he is just s throw in for me.

Juolevi is not just a throw in man come on...

 

[Baxterman]

Juolevi is not just a throw in man come on...

He’s not an asset or player I have any interest in adding to our team.

 

[Tkachuky]

He’s not an asset or player I have any interest in adding to our team.

Why?

 

[Baxterman]

Why?

Because I don’t think he is a good player or a guy likely to do much at the NHL level.

 

[Breakers]

Pass
I dont want the Sam Bennet and the idiotic penalties that go along with his game

 

[Johnny Hoxville]

The only guys on Van I’d move Hanifin for are Boeser or Pettersson.

 

[Canuck Luck]

The only guys on Van I’d move Hanifin for are Boeser or Pettersson.

Lol keep dreaming. there’s no one on Calgary gets you either of those guys.

 

[Lunatik]

Lol keep dreaming. You can keep Hanifin because there’s no one on Calgary that gets you either of those guys

He never suggested the Canucks would do that

 

[CraigsList]

Lol keep dreaming. You can keep Hanifin because there’s no one on Calgary that gets you either of those guys

Monahan, Gaudreau, Tkachuk.

But okay.

 

[Canuck Luck]

Monahan, Gaudreau, Tkachuk.

But okay.

Only one of those 3 I would consider is Gaudreau and that’s for boeser not Pettersson. I still say no given salaries/age and the fact boeser was above a PPG before his wrist injury. He still finished with similar point totals as Gaudreau comparing their first years

 

[Johnny Hoxville]

It’s nice to have dreams because there’s no one on Calgary gets you either of those guys.

Which is fine. But it goes both ways, Hanifin is a tremendous young dman with sky high potential. #1 dman hold that kind of value, I would only move Hanifin in a deal for a player with elite upside.

Also neither Boeser or Pettersson have the value Gaudreau has, yet.

 

[CraigsList]

Only one of those 3 I would consider is Gaudreau and that’s for boeser not Pettersson. I still say no given salaries/age and the fact boeser was above a PPG before his wrist injury. He still finished with similar point totals as Gaudreau comparing their first years

A one year wonder has nowhere near the same value as Gaudreau. Especially one that has only played a game.

Your valuation of your players are premature and uncalled for.