Flames - Blue Jackets 15 goal game

JPeeper

Hail Satan!
Jan 4, 2015
11,616
8,735
Neal: 3 goals, 5.75M/year (with Brouwer's buyout 7.25M/year).

Brouwer: 6 goals, 875k/year.

Flames are 3rd in the league in scoring, but lets look at 1 player we acquired and not Lindholm, Hanifin, Ryan, Czarnik, getting rid of Hamilton so Gio and Brodie can flourish, getting a coach who isn't dogshit and lets the players play their game.

Atrocious take bud.
 

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,436
11,109
Flames boring hockey though, AMIRITE? Who was that poster again?
 

absolute garbage

Registered User
Jan 22, 2006
4,415
1,785
Flames are 3rd in the league in scoring, but lets look at 1 player we acquired and not Lindholm, Hanifin, Ryan, Czarnik, getting rid of Hamilton so Gio and Brodie can flourish, getting a coach who isn't dog**** and lets the players play their game.
True, and Neal and management should be happy that they are being carried by bunch of other players (at least for now). Would be a lot more attention on this disaster of a signing otherwise, similar to Lucic in Edmonton.

It's still early but so far it looks like they did a good job retooling things overall and getting a good coach, agreed. One huge, expensive blunder mixed in there though.
Brouwers buyout has nothing to do with Neal’s contract. And besides that, Neal is still 3 times the player Brouwer is, let’s not get it twisted
You really think they would've had the cap space to throw Neal almost 30M if Brouwer was still fully in the books this season? Certainly they don't have that cap space currently (looking at capfriendly). And no. Neal is garbage. Was last season, the season before that, and is still.
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,239
3,541
Calgary
Neal has been an effective player, he's just not scoring. Brouwer was a detriment to whoever he was on the ice with. Not even close to comparable.

Peter's shortened the bench last night and benched the 3rd line. But instead of Benching Neal, he moved him up to the 2nd line. It'll come.
 

PsYcNeT

The No-Fun Zone
Jan 24, 2007
1,145
335
You really think they would've had the cap space to throw Neal almost 30M if Brouwer was still fully in the books this season? Certainly they don't have that cap space currently (looking at capfriendly). And no. Neal is garbage. Was last season, the season before that, and is still.

Neal was signed more than a month before the Brouwer buyout though?
 

Snakepit

Registered User
Nov 19, 2013
6,110
1,769
Right, obviously the roster wasn't finalized at that point. Don't think Hanifin had a contract either. Besides you can go over the cap in the offseason.
They never did go over though.

Brouwer was bought so they could give Hanifin a long term deal instead of a bridge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dan403

Fig

Absolute Horse Shirt
Dec 15, 2014
12,969
8,453
Obviously a fun night due to the banner I stand behind, but I really didn't expect a game where 8obrov5ky happens and Torts smiles all game like he's been smoking jazz cabbage.

Quite a welcome treat after all those Gully years. :) Well, a Torts melt down would have been the cherry on top.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad