Genesis76
True Leader
- May 3, 2013
- 3,878
- 1,301
yeah most of us are not 75 years old here, thats for sureeeee Subban ahead of Markov? I guess this is indicative of the age bracket of those voting..
Add Rucinsky.
yeah most of us are not 75 years old here, thats for sureeeee Subban ahead of Markov? I guess this is indicative of the age bracket of those voting..
Add Rucinsky.
I think he would of done just as good, Halak was playing 60 mins a game and Subban about 30 mins. He was on a special bubble at that time, what ever success we had it was on him 100%. People forget that he's not a big goalie so what he did was HUGE.
What he did in 2010 had a tremendous impact on Carey's future with the habs.
If anything it made Carey a much better goalie. I think you must put him starting round 3. I believe Halak wins #3.
Im 39 and huge Markov fan... but I still picked PK.
The success wasnt 100% on Halak. You're completely disregarding other players who were all great in the first two rounds
And Halak #3 over one of PK or Markov and Kovy??? I dont think so.
Really? Ok. But, Markov was a stalwart for 16yrs. How does a flash in the pan trump and overshadow that? To each their own. I just don't get it. And PK is fantastic. But, Markov.. 79 could be retired.. imo
Really? Ok. But, Markov was a stalwart for 16yrs. How does a flash in the pan trump and overshadow that? To each their own. I just don't get it. And PK is fantastic. But, Markov.. 79 could be retired.. imo
Cmon now. 76 retired at all is an asinine scenario. No post 93 players are worthy of jersey retirement besides Koivu and Markov. And eventually Price. Aaand perhaps Weber if he has Chelios longevity.
I think he would of done just as good, Halak was playing 60 mins a game and Subban about 30 mins. He was on a special bubble at that time, what ever success we had it was on him 100%. People forget that he's not a big goalie so what he did was HUGE.
What he did in 2010 had a tremendous impact on Carey's future with the habs.
If anything it made Carey a much better goalie. I think you must put him starting round 3. I believe Halak wins #3.
In fact can't you put as many names as you want? why limit your self?
And to the guy who deosn't want Halak, I bet he would of traded Subban for Weber 1v1 and would of had Galchenyuk play as a winger. I bet he would have DD as his no1 Centerman, I'm I right?
Don't think Halak wins #3.
But, I completely agree with point previous to that one. That competition and Price seeing a late round pick stealing the spotlight from him, what it meant to him and what it meant to Halak is what I think was a huge turnaround in Price becoming more professional in his approach.
Ultimately, it made him what he was from 2010 until last year. He regressed last year though, reminded me of the 2009 Price.
I would personally have Price before Markov thats for sure.
Price was also a very, very young man at that point.
Wuuuuuut?
Problem with Markov over PK: sure Markov wins for longevity with the team and staying even when we sucked BUT PK was the much better playoff performer and it's not even close. And PK was better in his prime than Markov was.
Markov was arguably #6-8 in the league in his prime. Subban has one Norris and has been a #3-7 D in the league since 2013. Also, if Markov was incredible playoff performer (which is a ballsy thing to say), how would you describe PK's performance then?PK better than Markov in his prime? LOL Sorry, 1) PK is in his prime now. 2)Markov was incredible playoff performer, let's see if PK can be remotely as good as Markov at 35.
PK would have not sniffed the Norris in a world where Lidstrom and Neids existed either.