Nac Mac Feegle
wee & free
- Jun 10, 2011
- 34,868
- 9,289
It's more for the responding patrol officers to arrest her at the scene and the chiefs comments mean to me something was fairly readily apparent immediately.
So either officers were able to observe something (obvious impairment) or the (soon to be) accused said something which gave grounds to arrest.
If you showed up and she was saying the bus hit the ice and I lost control, the chief wouldn't be saying "there was something that caused us to arrest her and bring her to the station."
If shes impaired shes getting arrested and transported to the station for a breath analysis (aka breathalyzer / intoxilyzer) or an evaluation by a drug recognition expert .
I could be totally off base of course. She could have said something that indicated intent and malice with no impairment and was arrested for that.
Bottom line is terrorism would have RCMP involvement by now.
Good point.
At this point, I'm leaning more towards the driver simply being so frantic/shocked after the incident, that perhaps they had to remove her from the scene for her own good. Or perhaps passengers/witnesses told police something that led them to take action (speeding, maybe arguing with a passenger/distracted). But, you're right. No possible way it could be malice/terrorism, or anything of that sort.