Fantasy GM Thread | Part 8

Status
Not open for further replies.

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
We also have no idea what the other team is looking to trade for these vets with term. I'm sure there would be some bad players/contracts coming back too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luckylarry

iceburg

Don't ask why
Aug 31, 2003
7,636
3,997
it is a pretty sure sign the guy ain't making it to the show as a winger.
You may be right. From what I've seen of him play, he looks a little soft out there. Not that strong along the boards and, at least at this stage, he would get eaten alive by wingers and D-men at the NHL level.
I just wonder whether they think he can transition to centre because of his skating and offense.
 

iceburg

Don't ask why
Aug 31, 2003
7,636
3,997
It wouldn't shock me if some team had mild interest in Beagle if we retain 50%.

Holtby/Eriksson/Roussel, not a chance.
Yeah.

If it were me, of the roster players I would rank interest highest to lowest as follows:

Pearson
Gaudette
Sutter
Virtanen
Benn
Beagle

All others I either wouldn't trade (within reason) or they'd have to pay to get rid of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot

dbaz

Registered User
Jan 29, 2010
1,142
480
so can someone fill me in on the math on exposing dmen for expansion? why are people discussing myers being exposed? don't we have three slots that pretty obviously go to schmidt, juolevi and myers? i would think our problem would be finding a dman under contract to fulfill the minimum exposure requirement.

basically, the theory is that due to covid finances and also teams only being able to protect 3 spots there will be other teams trying to sell top 4 dman for cheap(schmidt style) that are better/cost less than myers. there are quite a few teams with this problem. if you acquire one, then hope that myers is taken like sbisa was or figure out the cap after.
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
16,840
9,512
basically, the theory is that due to covid finances and also teams only being able to protect 3 spots there will be other teams trying to sell top 4 dman for cheap(schmidt style) that are better/cost less than myers. there are quite a few teams with this problem. if you acquire one, then hope that myers is taken like sbisa was or figure out the cap after.

that would be incredibly monumentally stupid if having this new guy and myers would cause a cap issue. we'd be completely at seattle's mercy given we need to resign hughes and petterson. the only way to do that is to pay seattle to take myers before we do such a deal.

very hard pass
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,573
83,991
Vancouver, BC
Why are we obviously protecting Juolevi?

I don't think there is any defender on our roster I'd be locked in on protecting right now. Maybe Schmidt.

If we could find 3 good options on the trade market under value from teams forced to sell assets, I'd move for and protect all 3.

If we end up protecting Juolevi, it probably means we haven't taken advantage of the expansion draft to the best extent possible.
 

dbaz

Registered User
Jan 29, 2010
1,142
480
that would be incredibly monumentally stupid if having this new guy and myers would cause a cap issue. we'd be completely at seattle's mercy given we need to resign hughes and petterson. the only way to do that is to pay seattle to take myers before we do such a deal.

very hard pass
its doable without a cap issue. 4-5mil cap is the avg cap range for the players who look to be not protected some outliers at 6. it just means they need to be smarter during ufa signings.

Why are we obviously protecting Juolevi?
its smarter for cap reasons/asset reasons. you basically want to expose as many bad contacts/higher cap hits during the expansion draft. theres a chance seattle takes these, with/without a slight incentive and then turns them around to another team with/without retention. ie myers could net them assets if retained.
if you leave a younger player like juolevi hed be a no-brainer pick as he has upside as a long term nhler. whether that be as a 2nd or 3rd pairing guy.
even if the canucks decide not to go with juolevi he was more value to them as a trade asset than someone to expose during the expansion draft.
 
Last edited:

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
16,840
9,512
its doable without a cap issue. 4-5mil cap is the avg cap range for the players who look to be not protected some outliers at 6. it just means they need to be smarter during ufa signings.


its smarter for cap reasons/asset reasons. you basically want to expose as many bad contacts/higher cap hits during the expansion draft. theres a chance seattle takes these, with/without a slight incentive and then turns them around to another team with/without retention.
if you leave a younger player like juolevi hed be a no-brainer pick as he has upside as a long term nhler. whether that be as a 2nd or 3rd pairing guy.
even if the canucks decide not to go with juolevi he was more value to them as a trade asset than someone to expose during the expansion draft.

i don't get your math.

$20 million comes off the books next year. with that they will need to replace 3d and 2 forwards, plus sign pettersson and hughes. unless seattle takes a decent salary off us, we will not have any extra dough for a new $4-5million contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyhee

dbaz

Registered User
Jan 29, 2010
1,142
480
i don't get your math.

$20 million comes off the books next year. with that they will need to replace 3d and 2 forwards, plus sign pettersson and hughes. unless seattle takes a decent salary off us, we will not have any extra dough for a new $4-5million contract.

they have 29mil to work with in the offseason.
bridge pettersson 2/3x 7.5
bridge hughes 2x 7
demko 2 x 3
gaudette 1.5
podz 925k
1 of rath/juolevi up 925-1mil

leaves roughly 8mil for 2 dmen. can increase it by 3milwith a holtby buyout if needed

re-sign pettersson-hughes long term after eriksson, beagle, roussel cap is gone
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
16,840
9,512
they have 29mil to work with in the offseason.
bridge pettersson 2/3x 7.5
bridge hughes 2x 7
demko 2 x 3
gaudette 1.5
podz 925k
1 of rath/juolevi up 925-1mil

leaves roughly 8mil for 2 dmen. can increase it by 3milwith a holtby buyout if needed

re-sign pettersson-hughes long term after eriksson, beagle, roussel cap is gone

where does $29million come from? are you counting things like the $1.025m that rfa demko makes? that is not coming off the books. there is about $20 million i can see.
 

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
its doable without a cap issue. 4-5mil cap is the avg cap range for the players who look to be not protected some outliers at 6. it just means they need to be smarter during ufa signings.


its smarter for cap reasons/asset reasons. you basically want to expose as many bad contacts/higher cap hits during the expansion draft. theres a chance seattle takes these, with/without a slight incentive and then turns them around to another team with/without retention. ie myers could net them assets if retained.
if you leave a younger player like juolevi hed be a no-brainer pick as he has upside as a long term nhler. whether that be as a 2nd or 3rd pairing guy.
even if the canucks decide not to go with juolevi he was more value to them as a trade asset than someone to expose during the expansion draft.

That's why you would protect Juolevi over Myers but the preferred option is still just having other good players so you don't have to protect either one.
 

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
they have 29mil to work with in the offseason.
bridge pettersson 2/3x 7.5
bridge hughes 2x 7
demko 2 x 3
gaudette 1.5
podz 925k
1 of rath/juolevi up 925-1mil

leaves roughly 8mil for 2 dmen. can increase it by 3milwith a holtby buyout if needed

re-sign pettersson-hughes long term after eriksson, beagle, roussel cap is gone

Demko will an UFA in 2 years so that will be an awful deal. You also need to allocate 1.7 million for Hughes/EP bonuses.
 

Burke's Evil Spirit

Registered User
Oct 29, 2002
21,395
7,386
San Francisco
Unless you can show me a cap-compliant, realistic lineup with RNH in it, any discussion of him is a waste of time. He would be a weird target anyway - the Canucks need a RHD if they had the space to go shopping.

FORWARDS (12)
Right wing: Brock Boeser ($5,875,000) - Adam Gaudette ($1,050,000) - Vasily Podkolzin ($925,000) - Zack MacEwen ($825,000)
Centre: Elias Pettersson ($7,500,000) - Ryan Nugent-Hopkins ($7,000,000) - Bo Horvat ($5,500,000) - Jay Beagle ($3,000,000)
Left wing: J.T. Miller ($5,250,000) - Nils Höglander ($891,667) - Tyler Motte ($1,225,000) - Jayce Hawryluk ($850,000)
DEFENSE (6)
Right: Cody Ceci ($1,250,000) - Matthew Benning ($1,000,000) - Tyler Myers ($6,000,000)
Left: Nate Schmidt ($5,950,000) - Quinn Hughes ($7,500,000) - Alexander Edler ($3,000,000)
GOALTENDER (2)
Thatcher Demko ($4,750,000) - Michael DiPietro ($811,667)
AHL BURIED (1)
Loui Eriksson ($4,875,000)
BUYOUTS (1)
Braden Holtby ($500,000)
DETAILS
Roster Size: 20
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Cap Hit: $78,563,546
Cap Space: $2,936,454

Agree with you though, a shutdown right-side D to play with Schmidt would be best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fedz

JanBulisPiggyBack

Registered User
Dec 31, 2011
3,841
2,721
FORWARDS (12)
Right wing: Brock Boeser ($5,875,000) - Adam Gaudette ($1,050,000) - Vasily Podkolzin ($925,000) - Zack MacEwen ($825,000)
Centre: Elias Pettersson ($7,500,000) - Ryan Nugent-Hopkins ($7,000,000) - Bo Horvat ($5,500,000) - Jay Beagle ($3,000,000)
Left wing: J.T. Miller ($5,250,000) - Nils Höglander ($891,667) - Tyler Motte ($1,225,000) - Jayce Hawryluk ($850,000)
DEFENSE (6)
Right: Cody Ceci ($1,250,000) - Matthew Benning ($1,000,000) - Tyler Myers ($6,000,000)
Left: Nate Schmidt ($5,950,000) - Quinn Hughes ($7,500,000) - Alexander Edler ($3,000,000)
GOALTENDER (2)
Thatcher Demko ($4,750,000) - Michael DiPietro ($811,667)
AHL BURIED (1)
Loui Eriksson ($4,875,000)
BUYOUTS (1)
Braden Holtby ($500,000)
DETAILS
Roster Size: 20
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Cap Hit: $78,563,546
Cap Space: $2,936,454

Agree with you though, a shutdown right-side D to play with Schmidt would be best.

dont forget Ferlund and his nightmare cap issue, he decides he wants to play 3-4 games, we lose a player on waivers only for him to get hurt again.
 

Fedz

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 18, 2003
3,930
350
Behind the Bench
FORWARDS (12)
Right wing: Brock Boeser ($5,875,000) - Adam Gaudette ($1,050,000) - Vasily Podkolzin ($925,000) - Zack MacEwen ($825,000)
Centre: Elias Pettersson ($7,500,000) - Ryan Nugent-Hopkins ($7,000,000) - Bo Horvat ($5,500,000) - Jay Beagle ($3,000,000)
Left wing: J.T. Miller ($5,250,000) - Nils Höglander ($891,667) - Tyler Motte ($1,225,000) - Jayce Hawryluk ($850,000)
DEFENSE (6)
Right: Cody Ceci ($1,250,000) - Matthew Benning ($1,000,000) - Tyler Myers ($6,000,000)
Left: Nate Schmidt ($5,950,000) - Quinn Hughes ($7,500,000) - Alexander Edler ($3,000,000)
GOALTENDER (2)
Thatcher Demko ($4,750,000) - Michael DiPietro ($811,667)
AHL BURIED (1)
Loui Eriksson ($4,875,000)
BUYOUTS (1)
Braden Holtby ($500,000)
DETAILS
Roster Size: 20
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Cap Hit: $78,563,546
Cap Space: $2,936,454

Agree with you though, a shutdown right-side D to play with Schmidt would be best.

What happened to Virtanen and Roussel?
 

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
FORWARDS (12)
Right wing: Brock Boeser ($5,875,000) - Adam Gaudette ($1,050,000) - Vasily Podkolzin ($925,000) - Zack MacEwen ($825,000)
Centre: Elias Pettersson ($7,500,000) - Ryan Nugent-Hopkins ($7,000,000) - Bo Horvat ($5,500,000) - Jay Beagle ($3,000,000)
Left wing: J.T. Miller ($5,250,000) - Nils Höglander ($891,667) - Tyler Motte ($1,225,000) - Jayce Hawryluk ($850,000)
DEFENSE (6)
Right: Cody Ceci ($1,250,000) - Matthew Benning ($1,000,000) - Tyler Myers ($6,000,000)
Left: Nate Schmidt ($5,950,000) - Quinn Hughes ($7,500,000) - Alexander Edler ($3,000,000)
GOALTENDER (2)
Thatcher Demko ($4,750,000) - Michael DiPietro ($811,667)
AHL BURIED (1)
Loui Eriksson ($4,875,000)
BUYOUTS (1)
Braden Holtby ($500,000)
DETAILS
Roster Size: 20
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Cap Hit: $78,563,546
Cap Space: $2,936,454

Agree with you though, a shutdown right-side D to play with Schmidt would be best.

Virtanen? Roussel? Luongo recapture? EP/Hughes bonuses? 3 other players to fill the roster?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peen

JanBulisPiggyBack

Registered User
Dec 31, 2011
3,841
2,721
Virtanen? Roussel? Luongo recapture? EP/Hughes bonuses? 3 other players to fill the roster?

This could be the roster in two years, in which case I don’t see RNH as part of that team, talk about a guy who doesn’t fit ( in my opinion )

if you are gonna bump Horvat down the depth chart to third line centre you need to find a really good puck distributor to play that second line, find me a way to get Zegras and GO!!
 

ginner classic

Dammit Jim!
Mar 4, 2002
10,636
935
Douglas Park
they have 29mil to work with in the offseason.
bridge pettersson 2/3x 7.5
bridge hughes 2x 7
demko 2 x 3
gaudette 1.5
podz 925k
1 of rath/juolevi up 925-1mil

leaves roughly 8mil for 2 dmen. can increase it by 3milwith a holtby buyout if needed

re-sign pettersson-hughes long term after eriksson, beagle, roussel cap is gone

So we lose Demko as a UFA?
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
16,840
9,512
let's try this cap math another way.

if i subtract all twelve roster positions that are either ufa or rfa and the various other things coming off you remove around $28 million right now.

but you have 10 forwards (including mott and eriksson), 2 dmen and a goalie under contract next year. and you have to add back mott and eriksson's full salaries back from ltir and the taxi squad.

so in reality you save about $26million and you have at least 10 roster spots to fill.

now allocate a minimum of $1m per empty roster spot as a baseline, because you are going to spend that to field a team.

and so you have $16m total to spend on paying any of those 10 roster guys more than $1million next year.

so pretty much all our raise money belongs to hughes, pettersson and demko. and there is not enough to do longterm deals.

which means we are replacing edler, hamonic and benn with roughly $1m contracts. maybe one $2m deal.

and that is all assuming a cap overage based on maxing out ferlund's ltir as we are doing right now.
 

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
let's try this cap math another way.

if i subtract all twelve roster positions that are either ufa or rfa and the various other things coming off you remove around $28 million right now.

but you have 10 forwards (including mott and eriksson), 2 dmen and a goalie under contract next year. and you have to add back mott and eriksson's full salaries back from ltir and the taxi squad.

so in reality you save about $26million and you have at least 10 roster spots to fill.

now allocate a minimum of $1m per empty roster spot as a baseline, because you are going to spend that to field a team.

and so you have $16m total to spend on paying any of those 10 roster guys more than $1million next year.

so pretty much all our raise money belongs to hughes, pettersson and demko. and there is not enough to do longterm deals.

which means we are replacing edler, hamonic and benn with roughly $1m contracts. maybe one $2m deal.

and that is all assuming a cap overage based on maxing out ferlund's ltir as we are doing right now.

It's a tough squeeze next year for sure.

It does make me wonder if we are looking at 1yr deals for all 3 of EP, Hughes, and Demko. Maybe the players prefer it as there will be more money in a year for the team & potentially the post-pandemic cap looks better. The team gets the lower cap fit during a tight season.
 

4Twenty

Registered User
Dec 18, 2018
9,987
11,831
See I don't really get this, the top guys are worth 8 year deals, the goalie worth 4 years, but they're mediocre again? But then just magically flip the following years?

I think if you believe in those guys you build around them now. I definitely see a way to building a playoff team next season and an improving contender beyond.

Sign:
Pettersson 5 years $8.5m, call it the Aho effect
Hughes 3 years $7.25m, highest scoring dman ever coming off an elc, lacks bigger leverage with 10.2c
Demko 3 years $3m,
Juolevi 2 years $1m
Podkolzin 3 years $925k (ELC)

Bury in Minors:
Eriksson $4.925m cap hit
Roussel $1.925m caphit

Stuck with:
Beagle $3m
Holtby $4.3m
Myers $6m

Before doing anything else, this projected lineup needs two top 4 dmen and an entire 3rd line. 15 roster spots taken by:

Miller-Pettersson-Boeser
Hoglander-Bo-Podkolzin (these could the 3rd line wingers)
*****-*****-*****
Motte-Beagle-Macewan

Hughes-*****
*****-Schmidt
Juolevi-Myers

Demko
Holtby

8 roster spots, $12m to spend. $1.5m for each spot. Say the 13th forward and 7th and 8th D are league minimum $750k guys.

$9.75m to strategically fill 5 key roster spots on 1 yr deals is doable IMO.


edit* these are not guys I want, but just illustrating the example but....You could afford to add these 1 year signings from this past season for ~$10m they would have to spend.

Haula $1.75m
Soderberg $1m
Vatanen $2m
Hoffman $4m
Ceci $1.25m

Yup, it's made in cap friendly.

ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES
q2.svg
BONUSESCAP SPACE
15$81,500,000$69,276,879$0$200,000$12,223,121
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Delete Signed PlayerBuyoutAdd to Trade
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
vancouver_canucks.svg

Miller, J.T.
$5,250,000
LW
UFA - 2
vancouver_canucks.svg

Pettersson, Elias
$8,500,000
C
RFA
vancouver_canucks.svg

Boeser, Brock
$5,875,000
RW
RFA - 1
vancouver_canucks.svg

Höglander, Nils
$891,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
vancouver_canucks.svg

Horvat, Bo
$5,500,000
C
UFA - 2
vancouver_canucks.svg

Podkolzin, Vasily
$925,000
RW
RFA
vancouver_canucks.svg

Motte, Tyler
$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
vancouver_canucks.svg

Beagle, Jay
$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
vancouver_canucks.svg

MacEwen, Zack
$825,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
vancouver_canucks.svg

Hughes, Quinn
$7,250,000
LD
RFA
vancouver_canucks.svg

Schmidt, Nate
$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
vancouver_canucks.svg

Holtby, Braden
$4,300,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
vancouver_canucks.svg

Juolevi, Olli
$1,000,000
LD
RFA
vancouver_canucks.svg

Myers, Tyler
$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
vancouver_canucks.svg

Demko, Thatcher
$3,000,000
G
RFA
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
vancouver_canucks.svg

Ferland, Micheal
$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
vancouver_canucks.svg

Virtanen, Jake
$2,550,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Taxi Squad
vancouver_canucks.svg

Eriksson, Loui
$6,000,000 ($4,875,000)
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
vancouver_canucks.svg

DiPietro, Michael
$811,667 ($0)
G
RFA - 1
vancouver_canucks.svg

Roussel, Antoine
$3,000,000 ($1,875,000)
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Cant fix the formatting but Jake is in LTIR because he's my proposed trade or expansion loss. Ferland is also LTIR not scratch. Taxi squad is buried.

let's try this cap math another way.

if i subtract all twelve roster positions that are either ufa or rfa and the various other things coming off you remove around $28 million right now.

but you have 10 forwards (including mott and eriksson), 2 dmen and a goalie under contract next year. and you have to add back mott and eriksson's full salaries back from ltir and the taxi squad.

so in reality you save about $26million and you have at least 10 roster spots to fill.

now allocate a minimum of $1m per empty roster spot as a baseline, because you are going to spend that to field a team.

and so you have $16m total to spend on paying any of those 10 roster guys more than $1million next year.

so pretty much all our raise money belongs to hughes, pettersson and demko. and there is not enough to do longterm deals.

which means we are replacing edler, hamonic and benn with roughly $1m contracts. maybe one $2m deal.

and that is all assuming a cap overage based on maxing out ferlund's ltir as we are doing right now.
this was a framework I suggested a week ago.

All that assumes:
-jake is gone no salary back
-Eriksson and Roussel buried
-beagle still on team
-Holtby and Myers are not claimed in expansion

After a week I’m already deciding to get Demko on a longer deal. Hopefully his play continues.
 

Peen

Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
Oct 6, 2013
30,003
25,391
Hamonic has been decent recently but shouldn’t be a long term option here unless they move Myers.

Clean house
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad