Proposal: Expiring rights

[Northernhawk]

Who would you sign and why?

Click to read more...

 

[EbonyRaptor]

None of the above. Cut bait on all of them because the Hawks are too close to the 50 max contracts as it is.

 

[bwana63]

Who would you sign and why?

Need to add a none option.

FWIW, I think none of these guys did enough to warrant a contract. On second thought, maybe Galvas, but I'm hardly an authority.

 

[Mrfenn92]

Galvas the only one I want Signed

 

[HockeySauce]

Galvas has been playing top-4 minutes in the Liga for the past couple seasons. He's 21. Played top-4 minutes in the Czech league prior, as a 19-year-old. I think he's worth bringing over to see what you have.

The others don't merit an NHL deal at this point IMO. Maybe they sign Moberg to an AHL deal and he starts in the ECHL but other than that none really move the needle.

 

[Muffinalt]

Galvas has been playing top-4 minutes in the Liga for the past couple seasons. He's 21. Played top-4 minutes in the Czech league prior, as a 19-year-old. I think he's worth bringing over to see what you have.

The others don't merit an NHL deal at this point IMO. Maybe they sign Moberg to an AHL deal and he starts in the ECHL but other than that none really move the needle.

Exactly this. Moberg showed some good things in camp but i don't know how he has looked since.

No way Galvas doesn't get signed.

 

[Northernhawk]

None of the above. Cut bait on all of them because the Hawks are too close to the 50 max contracts as it is.

Next year we have spots under the 50 contract rule...this year we don't

 

[giza]

Normally, this would be Galvas----he's got good experience in international play and in the top Swedish league. And maybe he's on a crap team over there, but his +/- last time I looked was really bad. Depending on how many bodies we can sign, I probably wouldn't sign any but if I had to choose, it probably would be Moberg----don't think Galvas brings anything to the table that some of our young, smaller D's already do.