mapleleaf979
Registered User
By no means do I think he is gonna be one of those guys, either in talent level or overall impact.
But he needs to continue to work on positioning, separating guys from the puck with his skating and stick, and to me there are few better to watch and learn that from than Neidermeyer and Lindstrom.
I do disagree on him being a 'Hainsey' type, because Hainsey eve when he was younger was not a good skater. Thats why I used the comparison to Stralman, about the same size and with similar limitations post draft.
Yes I agree with bolded. Sandin and Liljegren defensively are in the same sphere. I think Liljegren is for sure stronger but Sandin can read guys better all over the ice.
I think the Hainsey template is a good starting point. For sure, Liljegren is a better skater. With Liljegren's skating he can dial in his gap and pressure, he can win the race to get the puck on a dump in and move it to his d partner etc. I literally just do not see a player with poise and confidence, vision to be an NHL puck mover right now. If he forces that style of play , he wont make the NHL. Hainsey never tried to play like Morgan Reilly, it would be a disaster, so he stuck to his strengths.
I do think and u can see it when Liljegren's confidence is down and u can see him on the bench disappointed with himself. Its one of the things i really like about Liljegren, his honesty with his game and how hard he can be on himself. He is a player in the MLSE umbrella, i personally root for to make it to the NHL. I know he wants it bad but he cant be stubborn and force offensive things or go for a skate with the puck. I literally held my breath when Liljegren rushed the puck most times, he didnt seem to have a plan and had trouble controlling the puck at speed. If he can settle in to a simple role and game at first, then he can show some of his offensive side and pick his spots etc.