Expansion fees for Major League Baseball teams could rise to $2.2 billion range

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,891
99,337
Cambridge, MA
NEW YORK -- Major League Baseball would consider expansion fees in the range of $2.2 billion for new franchises, though there are no current plans to add teams.

Commissioner Rob Manfred spoke Tuesday during SporticoLive's online discussion of its estimates to baseball franchise valuations. The company estimated the average MLB franchise value is $2.2 billion, led the New York Yankees at $6.75 billion.

Colorado and Miami paid $95 million each to join in 1993, and Arizona and Tampa Bay paid $130 million to join in 1998.

Manfred has said repeatedly that MLB will not consider expansion until the Oakland Athletics and Tampa Bay Rays get new ballparks. The Athletics have proposed a stadium in the Howard Terminal area of downtown Oakland, and the Rays have said they will pursue splitting seasons between the Tampa Bay area and Montreal starting in 2028, after the expiration of their lease at Tropicana Field in St. Petersburg, Florida.
No plans for those cities have been finalized.

Manfred has mentioned as possible expansion candidates: Charlotte, North Carolina; Las Vegas; Montreal; Nashville, Tennessee; Portland, Oregon; and Vancouver, British Columbia.
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,891
99,337
Cambridge, MA
No one is going to pay that much $ for an MLB expansion team

According to Forbes you only have 7 MLB teams worth that now

upload_2021-4-28_3-19-25.png
 

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
19,217
3,123
in the midnight sea
Maybe they could get money like that for a big market like LA, NY, or Chicago, but to spend that kind of money to put a new team in a potentially lousy location doesn't make sense, but I suppose if you get a rich guy who wants it bad enough someone will pay it
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
186,923
39,015
Why do the status of new stadiums for two teams have to do with expansion?
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,891
99,337
Cambridge, MA
Why do the status of new stadiums for two teams have to do with expansion?

Possible relocation - Oakland is inching closer but if Howard Terminal falls apart they will start looking elsewhere (Portland?) The A's have been looking at options for close to 20 years now.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
186,923
39,015
Possible relocation - Oakland is inching closer but if Howard Terminal falls apart they will start looking elsewhere (Portland?) The A's have been looking at options for close to 20 years now.
If you have enough options for new markets though, I don’t think that should really matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSF

Lunatik

Registered User
Oct 12, 2012
56,246
8,380
If you have enough options for new markets though, I don’t think that should really matter.
Do they have enough options? There is Montreal and...? After Montreal we're starting to talk about metro areas of 2-2.5m or less. Which would include Vancouver, Charlotte, Portland, Orlando, San Antonio, Sacramento, Vegas, Columbus & Austin.

Unless of course they are willing to open up the border to the south, then Mexico City would be a no brainer. Monterrey and Guadalajara could be options then too as both of which are in 2 of the most affluent areas of Mexico and the Metro areas have 4+ million
 

Scandale du Jour

JordanStaal#1Fan
Mar 11, 2002
62,218
28,938
Asbestos, Qc
www.angelfire.com
Do they have enough options? There is Montreal and...? After Montreal we're starting to talk about metro areas of 2-2.5m or less. Which would include Vancouver, Charlotte, Portland, Orlando, San Antonio, Sacramento, Vegas, Columbus & Austin.

Unless of course they are willing to open up the border to the south, then Mexico City would be a no brainer. Monterrey and Guadalajara could be options then too as both of which are in 2 of the most affluent areas of Mexico and the Metro areas have 4+ million

Going to Mexico could be a great idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lunatik

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
31,285
31,379
Dartmouth,NS
For 2.2 billion it would have to be a major market. This is essentially just saying they aren't open to expansion right now unless like Elon Musk gets bored or something.
 

Bjorn Le

Hobocop
May 17, 2010
19,592
609
Martinaise, Revachol
For 2.2 billion it would have to be a major market. This is essentially just saying they aren't open to expansion right now unless like Elon Musk gets bored or something.
No it's not. You act like an expansion fee is picked arbitrarily out of a hat.
If this is true then Montreal is out.

But then again what potential expansion candidate have owners ready to pay that amount?
This changes literally nothing about Montreal. Everyone knows it's not a matter of if Montreal gets a team back, it's when and how.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,027
9,653
The Mariners were bought for 1.4B in 2016, so I wouldn't say never, but the list of potential suitors would be short.
It's also the markets that the MLB is looking into. Is a team in Portland, Charlotte, Nashville, Vegas, etc. going to be worth that $2 Bill plus price tag?
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,891
99,337
Cambridge, MA
MLB has to come to grips that they are no longer the national pastime and at best slightly ahead of the NBA.

Today MLB is king in only 1 market - New York City and possibly LA

Boston was always a Red Sox town but the Patriots changed that even with the Red Sox winning it all 4 times since 2004.

The NFL took great pains NOT to set an expansion team threshold price while allowing teams to leave St. Louis, San Diego, and Oakland.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CHRDANHUTCH

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad