Evander Kane suspended 2 games for boarding

Discussion in 'National Hockey League Talk' started by RemmyDarko, Dec 8, 2014.

  1. MISC*

    MISC* Guest

    No team has 2nd men jump in to fight more than the Jets.

    Then they complain when 2 players rough up one if there's.
     
  2. Hank Chinaski

    Hank Chinaski Registered User

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    20,571
    Likes Received:
    2,507
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    YFO
    Awards:
    I've long wondered why the NHL no longer calls double minors for roughing. It used to be called on a semi-frequent basis in those situations, now I see that roughing is no longer an infraction that can be assessed a double minor.
     
  3. Derfel*

    Derfel* Guest

    Video links of these events?
     
  4. Hank Chinaski

    Hank Chinaski Registered User

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    20,571
    Likes Received:
    2,507
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    YFO
    Awards:
    Citation needed.

    Bogosian skating in to fight Holzer a few years back is the only example I can think of.
     
  5. Tom ServoMST3K

    Tom ServoMST3K Houle Yeah!

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    25,315
    Likes Received:
    11,991
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    What's your excuse?
    I assume you mean scrums and not drop gloves fights, right?
     
  6. winnipegger

    winnipegger Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,812
    Likes Received:
    3,332
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Maybe this will be a turning point for Kane. I think he considers himself a superstar and there really isn't much to merit that. He's quickly becoming a glorified 3rd line checker.

    Probably not worth 2 I would have said 1 is fine. Even if it was 1, he's hurting the team which is already missing key players.
     
  7. Koonta

    Koonta The Boss Wears White

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    5,720
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Thunder Road
    What would have happened if one of those punches that Stoner was throwing landed directly into Kane's face injuring him severely, broken jaw, fractured cheekbone, etc because Kane wasn't able to defend himself because of the other player. Would that be a suspension then? it sure as heck should be.
     
  8. Hobby Bull

    Hobby Bull amazon sucks

    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,184
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    72
    Interesting.

    Listening to the justification on the Nhl site, the dialogue is clearly not objective, and instead stretches to justify the department's decision.

    It would be interesting in the future to hold up this example to compare with future suspensions/non-suspensions.
     
  9. Stupid hit. Kane shouldn't have made it. Strange how bunch of the Jets fans are focusing on the fact that he got suspended instead of the fact that Kane skated across the ice staring at a guys back to hit him in the back. That is a special kind of stupid.

    And to all the people complaining about consistency of the NHL on this, all I can say is does it actually shock you?
     
  10. a Fool

    a Fool Emperor has no picks

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2014
    Messages:
    2,575
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I'm going to go out on a limb and say there wont be any consistency. Just a gut feeling.
     
  11. tucker22*

    tucker22* Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Messages:
    932
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I love it when people that I am sure never played the game are experts in the game cause they pull up the rule book. Check out what Kerry Fraser said about it..... refs made the wrong call.

    http://www.tsn.ca/talent/kerry-fraser-1.88470
     
  12. Romang67

    Romang67 BitterSwede

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    Messages:
    24,054
    Likes Received:
    4,256
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Evanston, IL
    Sounds like a lie to me. I'm sure you will back this up though.
     
  13. Koonta

    Koonta The Boss Wears White

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    5,720
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Thunder Road
    As if you would not be complaining if a player on your favourite team got suspended double the amount of similar suspensions while having no prior history with this kind of hit where there was no injury to boot. 1 game sure but 2 games is excessive.
     
  14. HOLDITHERE*

    HOLDITHERE* Guest

    As much as I loved seeing Kane get punched in the face repeatedly, Stoner definitely deserves a game or two for that.

    Kane's is easily deserved.
     
  15. CherryCoke

    CherryCoke Toxic

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,877
    Likes Received:
    1,769
    Trophy Points:
    186
    I wonder if Pronger playing for the Ducks had anything to do with this decision. #conflictofinterest
     
  16. Classicnamesup

    Classicnamesup MVP Backhand Slapper

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    8,979
    Likes Received:
    402
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Guru Meditation
    Deserves the suspension, IMO so does Stoner.
     
  17. I would more focus that a player on my favourite team was stupid enough to take that hit. I understand one thing about the NHL that is definite. This league is very inconsistent and none of the judgements or calls ever make sense. I save myself the heartache from trying to make sense of the disciplinary actions they take. I would be more worried that a player who is supposed to put pucks in the net and be a leader on my team decided to make such a idiotic hit. Like I said, a special kind of stupid.
     
  18. Whileee

    Whileee Registered User

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    38,502
    Likes Received:
    14,895
    Trophy Points:
    156
    The NHL's job is to be objective and consistent. That's why they pay people specifically to review these.

    I think that this hit was penalized beyond the norm based on past practice, so unless the NHL has now decided to set a new standard, it is inconsistent.

    I predict that it will now be a "benchmark" example for fans and future hits will be compared to Kane's hit with comments like "if Kane's hit got 2 games, this hit deserves xxxx". I wonder if the NHL will really start using this as a standard for future suspensions.

    If the result is not the issue, then MacKinnon's elbow to the head of Perreault was as deliberate and dangerous as this. He was clearly frustrated and targeted Perreault's head against the glass with an elbow at high speed.
     
  19. 1rd

    1rd ¡Hala Madrid!

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    34
    It was a cheap hit, but don't think it deserved a suspension.. 5 minutes seems enough for that. :dunno:
     
  20. Sojourn

    Sojourn Where's the kaboom?

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    47,436
    Likes Received:
    3,970
    Trophy Points:
    187
    I agree. If the referee didn't want to call it a fight, because of the obvious implications, I can understand that. I've always been a proponent of giving the referees some flexibility in situations like this, because some calls become automatic when certain conditions are met, and at times that means an automatic 5 and a game misconduct. If the referee thinks he deserves to be, fine, but sometimes it seems like the referee doesn't want to toss a guy, and I have no problem with the referee making that decision. It's one of the reasons he's out there, IMO. But Stoner coming in and swinging like that is, to me, clearly not just two minutes. Especially when Vatanen is already there, putting Kane in a more vulnerable position. I felt, at the time, and still do now, that Stoner's actions were worth more than 2. Maybe not worth 5, but certainly worth more than two.

    That entire game was a bit frustrating. It just felt like there was no consistency, and even the players didn't seem to know what was going to be called. I guess the good news is that it was inconsistent for both teams, but that's not much of a positive.
     
  21. Gene Parmesan

    Gene Parmesan Dedicated to babies who came feet first

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    84,758
    Likes Received:
    2,371
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    California
    Pretty stupid hit.
     
  22. duckaroosky

    duckaroosky So sayeth Duckthulu

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    30,068
    Likes Received:
    1,037
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Occupation:
    Dinosaur Supervisor
    Location:
    Long Beach, Ca
    Someone should inform Mr. Fraser there is no such thing as a double minor for roughing (anymore) and I have no idea who Vartanen is. But thanks for the classic "hmph you OBVIOUSLY don't play hockey" response, was waiting for that to come up.
     
  23. Tom ServoMST3K

    Tom ServoMST3K Houle Yeah!

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    25,315
    Likes Received:
    11,991
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    What's your excuse?


    Comparable hit, no supplementary, I believe there was a 2 minute minor called on the play.
     
  24. Koonta

    Koonta The Boss Wears White

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    5,720
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Thunder Road
    Sorry but I find it hard to believe you that you wouldn't be upset with the length of suspension if the same set of circumstances were present in terms of no prior history and no injury. Anyway I am also not giving a break to Kane here at all and I'm pretty sure alot of Jets fans are not either, The hit was stupid no question but I think one game would've been enough. I agree with you however that there is no rhyme or reason to D.O.P.S decisions at all.

    Anyway it is what it is and we'll have to move on
     
  25. jungles

    jungles Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Messages:
    382
    Likes Received:
    281
    Trophy Points:
    74
    Here is the explanation for Lowry's:

    http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=741268

    The description from the NHL is almost identical in language, plus Lowry's ends up with an "injury" to Kaleta (whereas Stoner does not according to the NHL).

    Lowry: 1 game
    Kane: 2 games

    Makes zero sense.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"