Engineer
Rustled your jimmies
- Dec 23, 2013
- 6,143
- 1,892
You're right. I decided to dig a little deeper:
On figuring out the contract value of what kind of money the team can offer to Erik Karlsson…
“I think we’ve addressed it. I want to be respectful here. I think we addressed it in the town halls. If you’re ready to pay the fine, I’ll go and sit down for a coffee afterwards. We have a CBA and I’m not allowed to say anything (publicly) until July 1st.”
The 'warning' from the NHL appears to have been related to Mark Stone contract talks.
On ideally wanting to get a Stone contract done before Karlsson’s deal…
“I might have gotten an email or maybe not gotten an email (from the NHL). Maybe warned or maybe not warned (by the NHL). I can’t talk about future contracts on a specific player (as I’ve been instructed) from our league. So I’m going to be very careful on that one, but when it comes to Mark Stone, we’ve had talks and they were productive. We feel confident that we can do something.”
Thoughts in Bold: Dorion's End of the Year Media Availability
Mark Stone was eligible for extension 11.5 months ago, why would the NHL warn them for discussing a players contract who is eligible for extension?