platotld
Fly Canucks Fly
No. It's just that he is slowed by his gigantic balls.
From his performance on ice when teammates have been needing a stand up fella to help them out, I would say he does not have said
balls.
No. It's just that he is slowed by his gigantic balls.
From his performance on ice when teammates have been needing a stand up fella to help them out, I would say he does not have said
balls.
I'm guessing shoulder and groin.Anyone think Gud might be playing with a lower body injury?
He was born 15 years too late. In the dead puck era, he would've been a valuable #4, holding up the F, grinding in the corner, facewashing the other team in front of his net and chipping the puck out off the glass the first chance he gets. His lack of speed and skill would not be noticeable back then, except maybe against the Avs and Wings.
Don't worry, "He has less than a career -100, it takes a career -300 to really learn to defend"With a -2 tonight, Gudbranson is now -97 in his career. When will he hit the impressive negative three-digit milestone? Monday vs Anaheim, or Wednesday at Colorado?
Congrats to Erik Gudbranson, whose -27 rating now leads the masters.
It drives me f***ing crazy how many times I see Pettersson passing back to the point...and there's Gudbranson there. Getting really really sick of Green trying valiantly to keep the Gudbranson pairing's +/- above freezing by constantly throwing them out there with Pettersson's line.Most of pettersson minus comes when he’s on the ice with gudbranson. The reason why gudbranson is put into a shift with pettersson is that he is the best bet of compensating for gudbranson terrible play.
Most of pettersson minus comes when he’s on the ice with gudbranson. The reason why gudbranson is put into a shift with pettersson is that he is the best bet of compensating for gudbranson terrible play.
This is great thanks+/- is a meaningless stat, or something, ha ha haaaaa.
The Vancouver Sun has made the "Benning talent whisperer work speaks for itself" article unavailable. I wonder why.
E: Found a working version:
New Canucks GM Jim Benning's talent whisperer's work speaks volumes
It isn't
The guy is dead serious
1 | Erik Gudbranson, D | VAN | 57 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -27 | 83 | 0.14 | 72 | 2.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | Maxime Lajoie, D | OTT | 56 | 7 | 8 | 15 | -25 | 20 | 0.27 | 79 | 8.9 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
3 | Michael Matheson, D | FLA | 56 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -23 | 32 | 0.36 | 97 | 5.2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Drew Doughty, D | LA | 61 | 5 | 28 | 33 | -23 | 30 | 0.54 | 119 | 4.2 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 1 | |
5 | Brendan Perlini, LW | CHI/ARI | 51 | 5 | 5 | 10 | -22 | 26 | 0.20 | 79 | 6.3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Rasmus Ristolainen, D | BUF | 61 | 5 | 32 | 37 | -22 | 30 | 0.61 | 150 | 3.3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | |
7 | Cody Ceci, D | OTT | 57 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -21 | 12 | 0.35 | 96 | 5.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ryan Getzlaf, C | ANA | 54 | 11 | 28 | 39 | -21 | 40 | 0.72 | 116 | 9.5 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
Mike Hoffman, LW | FLA | 60 | 26 | 25 | 51 | -21 | 20 | 0.85 | 190 | 13.7 | 5 | 11 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
10 | Dennis Cholowski, D | DET | 52 | 7 | 9 | 16 | -20 | 16 | 0.31 | 71 | 9.9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
I'm sure he believes it to some extent, but he's clearly exaggerating for attention.
I don't think he's exaggerating. I think he's being refreshingly honest about something that frequently produces dishonesty.
Supporters of "toughness" will argue endlessly, without supporting evidence, that it contributes to winning, when what's really going on is that having players who will beat up other players is simply important to them for its own sake.
Years ago I read a fascinating article about junior hockey in Flin Flon. The fans there would boo the team in the third period, no matter the score, if there hadn't been enough fights. That's an extreme version of a mentality that's quite pervasive. Some fans feel that the team expresses their own identity vicariously, and they want that identify to be ... tough.
I don't think he's exaggerating. I think he's being refreshingly honest about something that frequently produces dishonesty.
Supporters of "toughness" will argue endlessly, without supporting evidence, that it contributes to winning, when what's really going on is that having players who will beat up other players is simply important to them for its own sake.
Years ago I read a fascinating article about junior hockey in Flin Flon. The fans there would boo the team in the third period, no matter the score, if there hadn't been enough fights. That's an extreme version of a mentality that's quite pervasive. Some fans feel that the team expresses their own identity vicariously, and they want that identify to be ... tough.