WesMcCauley
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2015
- 8,616
- 2,600
kelsier said:Should they play today Lindros spending all that amount of time in the penalty box alone would give Forsberg a huge advantage
Too broad of a question. Lindros was clearly the better player, Forsberg clearly had the better careerWho was the better player? Consider everything.
Pretty much thisBoth great players but Lindros had the potential and the all around skillset to be one of the best players of all time. At his best he was one of the most dominant players ever. I can't speak for players pre-80's because I never watched them play, but Lindros at his best in the 90's, was the best player I have ever seen outside of Gretzky and Lemieux.
Not close. If lindros had zero skill he'd be an NHL player as a brutal enforcerWhich one was more physically dominant? Lindros was bigger but Forsberg was nasty
You also need a lot of the stuff Lindros had that Crosby doesn'tI've never felt that Lindros is the type of player with the drive to make it that far.
Look at Crosby. Insane compete level. Wants to win at every level, leader, etc. You need some of that stuff to make a big 5 and Lindros is lacking.
With no injuries he would have made it far but not top 5.
Lindros was an absolute bull that was insanely hard to handle, but Foppa was more varied, he could overpower Hatcher and he could outskill Lidstrom. Plus he had the much better defensive game and that ridiculous playoff resume.
Two players who's body's just couldn't handle their playing style. So I'm homer voting.
Just to consider Forsberg being only a minor piece in a trade like no other and turning into equal if not better player, just frigging amazing. Should they play today Lindros spending all that amount of time in the penalty box alone would give Forsberg a huge advantage.
Forsberg, Lindros is romanticized due to Canadian and east coast bias.