He would have played a full year this season if not for our depth. He has the strength and the defensive ability to be an everyday player. There's no reason not to keep him up permanently. Another year in the AHL will do nothing for his growth. The only way he'll get better now is by getting more experience in the NHL. If Murph thinks Smith-Pelly and Palmieri are above him then he'll be traded. One way or the other he'll be a full-time player next season. I really don't see why it should be any other way.
CENTERS
Getzlaf
Bonino
Perreault
Rakell
RW
Perry
Silfverberg
Smith-Pelly
Palmieri
LW
Maroon
Cogliano
Etem
Winnik
Why would we need to trade either of those?
Again, i don`t agree with you. If he`s not a clear cut NHL`er (which he still kind of isn`t), he can learn in AHL. Just for example Gustav Nyquist played 2 seasons splitting time between AHL and NHL, before errupting this season. Both seasons he saw almost 60 games in A (both seasons over PPG winger) and 20 games in NHL (without any spectacular point pace). It`s just an example, but imo it shows that you can stay in A a bit longer and still not ruin your career but actually improve. Etem right now have 1 mediocre season in AHL, 1 good/great one (this year), 2 average ''seasons'' in NHL and 1 great and 1 below average (current one) playoff runs in NHL. He`s far from proven everything.
That's a silly benchmark. Etem was not dominant in the AHL. Vatanen actually was, but I wouldn't call him ready, either. You should watch instead of just picking arbitrary cutoffs.
You can ask for a player to actually dominate. A threat every time he's on the ice, a mismatch to everyone he plays against. That's not Etem - he's an opportunistic player who can make an opponent pay for a mistake and plays well with creative linemates. He doesn't create all that much himself.I say over a PPG pace in the AHL against adults is pretty damn dominant. Don't know what more you can ask for regarding that term being used.
That's a silly benchmark. Etem was not dominant in the AHL. Vatanen actually was, but I wouldn't call him ready, either. You should watch instead of just picking arbitrary cutoffs.
They were our best forwards, true. That doesn't mean either was dominant, or that either was definitely ready to make the full time jump.For once I agree with ducksgo here bud.
Etem and smith Pelly were by far our best forwards
They were our best forwards, true. That doesn't mean either was dominant, or that either was definitely ready to make the full time jump.
CENTERS
Getzlaf
Bonino
Perreault
Rakell
RW
Perry
Silfverberg
Smith-Pelly
Palmieri
LW
Maroon
Cogliano
Etem
Winnik
Why would we need to trade either of those?
He's a free agent and I don't expect him back personally.
At some point, you need to add more experienced players IMO. Right now our forward line up is probably something like this:
Beleskey - Getzlaf - Perry
Palmieri-Perrault-Etem
Siflverberg - Bonino - Cogliano
Maroon - Rakell - DSP
Jackman
I don't mind having young players in the lineup, but there's zero reason we shouldn't add a player this offseason that helps improve our top 6. I expect one of: Beleskey/Etem/Palmieri/Silfverberg/DSP to be moved, and another to be demoted. Not sure who will be moved, but gotta think Etem is the odd man out again as far as demotion goes.
Would be really disappointed if it was Etem the odd man out. He hasn't even had a solid shake regarding a full season yet.
Silf and Palms have. And Silf being the worst of the bunch.