Lonny Bohonos
Registered User
I know. My post wasnt directed at you as such.I was being sarcastic. If your results are due to "luck" for three straight seasons, then it's probably not luck after all.
I know. My post wasnt directed at you as such.I was being sarcastic. If your results are due to "luck" for three straight seasons, then it's probably not luck after all.
Rk | Player | PTS | Tm | Lg | Pos | Season | Age | GP | G | A | +/- | PIM | EV | PP | SH | GW | S | S% | TOI | G | A | PTS | S | OPS | DPS | PS | G | A | PTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Teemu Selanne* | 132 | WIN | NHL | RW | 1992-93 | 22 | 84 | 76 | 56 | 8 | 45 | 52 | 24 | 0 | 7 | 387 | 19.6 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 1.57 | 4.61 | 12.2 | 1.3 | 13.4 | 62 | 45 | 107 | |
2 | Alex Ovechkin | 106 | WSH | NHL | LW | 2005-06 | 20 | 81 | 52 | 54 | 2 | 52 | 28 | 21 | 3 | 5 | 425 | 12.2 | 1751 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 1.31 | 5.25 | 11.0 | 1.6 | 12.7 | 52 | 52 | 104 |
3 | Sidney Crosby | 102 | PIT | NHL | C | 2005-06 | 18 | 81 | 39 | 63 | -1 | 110 | 23 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 278 | 14.0 | 1630 | 0.48 | 0.78 | 1.26 | 3.43 | 8.9 | 1.6 | 10.5 | 39 | 60 | 99 |
4 | Evgeni Malkin | 85 | PIT | NHL | LW | 2006-07 | 20 | 78 | 33 | 52 | 2 | 80 | 17 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 242 | 13.6 | 1494 | 0.42 | 0.67 | 1.09 | 3.10 | 7.8 | 1.6 | 9.4 | 35 | 52 | 87 |
5 | Sergei Fedorov* | 79 | DET | NHL | C | 1990-91 | 21 | 77 | 31 | 48 | 11 | 66 | 17 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 259 | 12.0 | 0.40 | 0.62 | 1.03 | 3.36 | 5.7 | 1.1 | 6.8 | 28 | 43 | 71 | |
6 | Eric Lindros* | 75 | PHI | NHL | C | 1992-93 | 19 | 61 | 41 | 34 | 28 | 147 | 32 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 180 | 22.8 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 1.23 | 2.95 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 7.8 | 33 | 27 | 60 | |
7 | Alex Zhamnov | 72 | WIN | NHL | C | 1992-93 | 22 | 68 | 25 | 47 | 7 | 58 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 163 | 15.3 | 0.37 | 0.69 | 1.06 | 2.40 | 4.6 | 1.0 | 5.6 | 20 | 38 | 58 | |
8 | Peter Forsberg* | 50 | QUE | NHL | C | 1994-95 | 21 | 47 | 15 | 35 | 17 | 16 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 86 | 17.4 | 0.32 | 0.74 | 1.06 | 1.83 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 5.0 | 26 | 61 | 87 | |
9 | Elias Pettersson | 50 | VAN | NHL | C | 2018-19 | 20 | 45 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 6 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 94 | 26.6 | 808 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 1.11 | 2.09 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 7.2 | 36 | 36 | 72 |
10 | Connor McDavid | 48 | EDM | NHL | C | 2015-16 | 19 | 45 | 16 | 32 | -1 | 18 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 105 | 15.2 | 850 | 0.36 | 0.71 | 1.07 | 2.33 | 4.8 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 18 | 36 | 54 |
Last 30 years, rookies with more than 1 PPG:
Didn’t Barzal score 85 points last season?
So there's a 1 in 10 chance he will be as successful as Alex Zhamnov.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Rk Player PTS Tm Lg Pos Season Age GP G A +/- PIM EV PP SH GW S S% TOI G A PTS S OPS DPS PS G A PTS 1 Teemu Selanne* 132 WIN NHL RW 1992-93 22 84 76 56 8 45 52 24 0 7 387 19.6 0.90 0.67 1.57 4.61 12.2 1.3 13.4 62 45 107 2 Alex Ovechkin 106 WSH NHL LW 2005-06 20 81 52 54 2 52 28 21 3 5 425 12.2 1751 0.64 0.67 1.31 5.25 11.0 1.6 12.7 52 52 104 3 Sidney Crosby 102 PIT NHL C 2005-06 18 81 39 63 -1 110 23 16 0 5 278 14.0 1630 0.48 0.78 1.26 3.43 8.9 1.6 10.5 39 60 99 4 Evgeni Malkin 85 PIT NHL LW 2006-07 20 78 33 52 2 80 17 16 0 6 242 13.6 1494 0.42 0.67 1.09 3.10 7.8 1.6 9.4 35 52 87 5 Sergei Fedorov* 79 DET NHL C 1990-91 21 77 31 48 11 66 17 11 3 5 259 12.0 0.40 0.62 1.03 3.36 5.7 1.1 6.8 28 43 71 6 Eric Lindros* 75 PHI NHL C 1992-93 19 61 41 34 28 147 32 8 1 5 180 22.8 0.67 0.56 1.23 2.95 6.4 1.4 7.8 33 27 60 7 Alex Zhamnov 72 WIN NHL C 1992-93 22 68 25 47 7 58 18 6 1 4 163 15.3 0.37 0.69 1.06 2.40 4.6 1.0 5.6 20 38 58 8 Peter Forsberg* 50 QUE NHL C 1994-95 21 47 15 35 17 16 12 3 0 3 86 17.4 0.32 0.74 1.06 1.83 4.1 0.9 5.0 26 61 87 9 Elias Pettersson 50 VAN NHL C 2018-19 20 45 25 25 15 6 18 7 0 7 94 26.6 808 0.56 0.56 1.11 2.09 5.4 1.8 7.2 36 36 72 10 Connor McDavid 48 EDM NHL C 2015-16 19 45 16 32 -1 18 13 3 0 5 105 15.2 850 0.36 0.71 1.07 2.33 4.8 1.0 5.8 18 36 54
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
So he was lucky in swe tier 2 and shl as well?I dont care what each one looks like, if he’s shooting 26.6% he’s lucky
All this talk about shot percentage, do I need to remind you that Petey has missed 11 games, plays on a horrible team, and still has as many assists as Kotkaniemi has points? And Kotkaniemi is a great rookie in his own right. Let that sink in, kid's going to be one of the best in the game for the next decade.
Sure its more than likely his shooting percentage will drop. But that is irrelevant unless people are saying he isnt a 40 goal scorer for example.That may very well be true, but people are going to keep bringing up his shooting percentage as long as some others retort with "Nah, he will be the one player ever to go against the statistical truth that is unsustainable shooting percentage. You just don't watch him." It's very bothersome to say the least.
He's a great player having an impressive rookie season. He's also riding a high shooting percentage that will drop. These are not conflicting statements.
He does have flaws though.Make a statue of this kid and the people of Vancouver would embrace it. Pettersson will be the greatest Canuck of all time. More dynamic and skilled than Bure.
-Cannon slap-shot
-Deceptive and accurate wrist shot
-Excellent speed
-Excellent passing
-Elite offensive and defensive awareness
Canucks fans cant shut up because we literally cannot see a single flaw in this kids game. It does not matter that his shot% will decrease because we know he will put up insane numbers.
Really dont care if this annoys some fans. This is the most excited most Canuck fans have ever been about a player. Get over it.
Yeah but Petterson always wanted to play hockey and for Vancouver. Google it...Alexander Daigle also started off pretty good.
He does have flaws though.
Hes not a very good hitter. He doesnt appear to be able to fight. His post to post movement is slow and his glove hand weak. Etc etc etc
What matters though is do his strengths outweigh his weaknesses. This is true of any player.
So frankly talking about his weaknesses seems largely irrelevant at this point unless there is a glaring weakness.
True. Instead of that he should focus on his glove hand and his lateral post to post movement.No player needs to be able to fight, and particularly not Elias Pettersson. It's not a flaw.
If he can nail those down and consistently for 20 seasons he will be GOATest.True. Instead of that he should focus on his glove hand and his lateral post to post movement.
He needs to pertekt his teamates.No player needs to be able to fight, and particularly not Elias Pettersson. It's not a flaw.
He needs to pertekt his teamates.
I see a Vezina, Hart, Art Ross, Selke abd Lady Byng coming all before the age of 23.If he can nail those down and consistently for 20 seasons he will be GOATest.
Masterdon trophy for persevering through 2 injuries this season...I see a Vezina, Hart, Art Ross, Selke abd Lady Byng coming all before the age of 23.
That may very well be true, but people are going to keep bringing up his shooting percentage as long as some others retort with "Nah, he will be the one player ever to go against the statistical truth that is unsustainable shooting percentage. You just don't watch him." It's very bothersome to say the least.
He's a great player having an impressive rookie season. He's also riding a high shooting percentage that will drop. These are not conflicting statements.
So he was lucky in swe tier 2 and shl as well?
Maybe he has the most accurate shot in the league.
Your posts in here has been nothing more than trolling, congrats.
I am tired of reading 4 pages of your garbage arguements that pettersson is lucky.
Pettersson doesnt have a single empty net point yet.
All this talk about shot percentage, do I need to remind you that Petey has missed 11 games, plays on a horrible team, and still has as many assists as Kotkaniemi has points? And Kotkaniemi is a great rookie in his own right. Let that sink in, kid's going to be one of the best in the game for the next decade.
Good linemates? Boeser is good but othervise he hasnt played with any top6 ones. Leivo is a toronto reject.He may have one of the most accurate shots but if you are implying that this will
Be even with a big drop off he’s still going to have the highest % for a career if he keeps it up. There is no question he’s getting lucky or fortunate.
He has good linemates and gets plenty of ice time on a bad team. That’s usually why rookies score a lot in the first place. If he’s playing behind the twins he’s not scoring that high.
He may have one of the most accurate shots but if you are implying that this will
Be even with a big drop off he’s still going to have the highest % for a career if he keeps it up. There is no question he’s getting lucky or fortunate.
He has good linemates and gets plenty of ice time on a bad team. That’s usually why rookies score a lot in the first place. If he’s playing behind the twins he’s not scoring that high.
Can you post the goals he’s scored you think are lucky?He may have one of the most accurate shots but if you are implying that this will
Be even with a big drop off he’s still going to have the highest % for a career if he keeps it up. There is no question he’s getting lucky or fortunate.
He has good linemates and gets plenty of ice time on a bad team. That’s usually why rookies score a lot in the first place. If he’s playing behind the twins he’s not scoring that high.