Eichel V Hughes V PLD & Heiskanen

Discussion in 'Polls - (hockey-related only)' started by Kappy, Oct 31, 2018.

?

Which would you prefer long term?

  1. Eichel

    30.0%
  2. Hughes

    15.0%
  3. PLD & Heiskanen

    55.0%
View Users: View Users
  1. Kappy

    Kappy Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2017
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Guaranteed the No 1 pick used to draft Jack Hughes

    Or

    Eichel- Contract included

    Or

    Miro Heiskanen and PLD
     
  2. tom leafers

    tom leafers Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,008
    Likes Received:
    643
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    Toronto
    Thats random.

    Probably Hughes though.
     
  3. SantaClaus

    SantaClaus On espère pour Lafrenière

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,363
    Likes Received:
    288
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    hu2l
    Heiskanen and Dubois
     
  4. Mattilaus

    Mattilaus Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,642
    Likes Received:
    661
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    This is a ridiculous poll quite clearly designed to make Eichel lose. Well done.
     
  5. Kappy

    Kappy Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2017
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    6
    How so?
     
  6. Kcb12345

    Kcb12345 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2017
    Messages:
    4,557
    Likes Received:
    3,072
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm a huge PLD fan (Jamie Benn 2.0 so why not?) and obviously a big Heiskanen fan so this was an easy choice for me. Should be an easy choice in this poll as well for most people

    Also 2 vs 1 vs 1 doesn't seem exactly fair but oh well
     
  7. Panthaz89

    Panthaz89 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2016
    Messages:
    2,903
    Likes Received:
    559
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Buffalo,NY
    pretty sure both Jacks are obviously put in an unfair measurement against a group of 2 elite players......it'd be hard to take Matthews over the group at this point.
     
  8. Mrb1p

    Mrb1p PRICERSTOPDAPUCK

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2011
    Messages:
    45,720
    Likes Received:
    7,140
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Citizen of the world
    I have a hard time choosing Hughes or PLD and Heiskanen,

    But I think a one two punch of PLD/Kotkaniemi +Heiskanen on LD is worth it here.
     
    ProspectsSTC likes this.
  9. nowhereman

    nowhereman Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,668
    Likes Received:
    577
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Went with Hughes but had to rethink my vote, since PLD/Heiskanen would be awesome, as well. Never been the biggest Eichel fan. Really nice player but not my first choice to build a team around.
     
  10. jonlin

    jonlin Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,349
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Not fair against Hughes and Eichel to have 2 players with elite potential against them. Ofcourse you take PLD+Heisk
     
  11. cowgirlcath

    cowgirlcath Johnny Mony and Cathy

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2018
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    23
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Calgary
    2 v 1 v 1 is unfair unless we're using McDavid as the 1
     
  12. Kcb12345

    Kcb12345 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2017
    Messages:
    4,557
    Likes Received:
    3,072
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    McDavid would win every time almost no matter what. I agree it's not fair though
     
  13. LongWayDown37

    LongWayDown37 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,162
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Kind of an impossible poll. Established great player with a big contract vs. an undrafted player vs. two nice young players.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"