- Jan 11, 2006
- 13,256
- 6,308
10th option? LolNo way in hell would I do a better job. Just saying that if you’re going into it with blind trust in their decisions then there’s really nothing to talk about or think about really.
But if you’re dead set on “if he could play they’d be playing him” then consider if they didn’t think he could play then why did they put him on the playoff roster?
Clifton had a fantastic playoff last year and rode along with us right to the finals. Lauzon has looked out of place on more than a few occasions. He is going to be good but I would rather have Clifton's experience from last year in the lineupWhy Clifton?
Best post.Hell, I remember when Spooner and Donato were first traded and had 1 good game people were furious in here. There's a certain contingent of fans in here that are more addicted to drama than an 8th grade schoolgirl.
Hell, I remember when Spooner and Donato were first traded and had 1 good game people were furious in here. There's a certain contingent of fans in here that are more addicted to drama than an 8th grade schoolgirl.
Accuses other people of being addicted to drama yet contributes nothing to the discussion other than just talking about said drama. Your entire post history is just trying to start arguments, I just went back to the Donato thread and it's just you trying to antagonize people that were talking about Donato's start of 15 points in 15 games and telling people to listen to you "as someone who played the game", like that matters lmao.
The more you respond the more it just feeds into what I'm saying. You're just here to try to antagonize, not actually talk hockey.Awww, did my remarks about your cringey humblebrag main board posts get you that riled? If so, I'm quite flattered (not to mention I was right about Donato).
The more you respond the more it just feeds into what I'm saying. You're just here to try to antagonize, not actually talk hockey.
As someone who played the game... That's a good one, I'm gonna use that. It's vague enough that it can't be fact checked, but it still gives off the impression that your words actually mean something.I talked hockey a lot in that Donato thread. Your frustration at me calling you out for your embarrassing main board threads is just blinding you to that. In addition, if you have a problem with my posts, alert the mods. Till told by them that my posts are outside the rules, I'll post whatever I wish.
You referring to this?Wow, Haggs threw Tukka under the bus tonight. Unprofessional guest appearance. Figures he’s out and doesn’t care.
You referring to this?
Insanity!!!!I trust the coaches over all Hf board posters when it come to lineups. If the kid could play he would be playing. Can’t see why he wouldn’t.
As someone who played the game...
That's a good one, I'm gonna use that. It's vague enough that it can't be fact checked, but it still gives off the impression that your words actually mean something.