Agree with Billy Smith but might take Lafontaine over Gillies but gillies was a big part of the 4 cup run.
Loungo over Linden is misplaced IMO.
Canuck fans love Linden who would have been a lifetime Canuck if it wasn't for the Messier-Keenan- ownership fiasco.
While Lou might have some hardware and better stats Linden was a class act throughout his career with Vancouver while Lou has had his moments.
I guess it might depend on how one defines the top 5 players historically
Yeah, no Linden just seems so wrong to me as well. Above both Lou and Naslund in my books.
like i hinted in my post, i don't agree with lou over linden-- and yes, naslund over linden seems wrong to me as well. but i saw the words "top" and "historically" in the title of the thread and thought we were talking about those silly objective all-time rankings that HOH loves, and by those criteria, it's hard to justify linden over guys who were hart nominees, post-season all-stars, captained the team to multiple 100 point seasons and division championships, etc. (all stuff that looks better on paper than in real life, mind you.)
now if we're talking about players that meant the most to a franchise and its fanbase, linden remains #1 in my books, or at the very lowest 1a with bure.
on the other hand, what is interesting is if games 3-7 of the finals had gone differently, the all-time canucks top five might well be sedin, sedin, kesler, luongo, and bure. what a difference a week makes, am i right?