So he wants to be a lower payroll team when it comes to the NHL, but he'll toss 250m$ at the AAF?
Doesn't sound like it's $250 million liquid.
So he wants to be a lower payroll team when it comes to the NHL, but he'll toss 250m$ at the AAF?
So sort of - quasi AAA NBA D-league then. That'd be smart.
Agreed.Regardless, this dude is starting to become very irritating. Good on him for this though.
Well, if someone tried floating that claim as reality they were patently wrong. Dundon has no power to "order" any other team to do anything that contradicts league rules or league policy, and anyone who believes he can must also believe that same power rests on the hands of the other 30 teams.There was an article where it was reported he "Ordered" Montreal to wear their Whites. Forget the name of the publisher.
Why? It doesn't hurt anything.Agreed.
I'm actually surprised at how many times wear their whites just to appease him.
Not sure what you're getting so uptight about. Dundon's trying to re-invent the wheel in the NHL it seems, and it's pretty humorous and sad to watch. He dislikes his team's white jerseys, so he pleads with other teams to wear theirs. Then, this whole celebration thing, it's gimmicky and tacky.Why? It doesn't hurt anything.
Oh, I know, it looks weird, only the home teams are supposed to wear their colored jerseys, whites are for the road team. It was every bit of 10 years ago here that people were still upset about the switch of home teams wearing white and how Bettman was running yet another hockey "tradition." Because apparently about 30 years of "home wears white" that started because of TV made for more "tradition" than the 40 or so years prior when roads teams wore white.
It's not that big a deal. Like I said, if it was, teams would [and do] say no. If your hockey watching experience is ruined because of the color jersey your team is wearing that night, you have issues.
And I'm the one that's uptight?Not sure what you're getting so uptight about. Dundon's trying to re-invent the wheel in the NHL it seems, and it's pretty humorous and sad to watch. He dislikes his team's white jerseys, so he pleads with other teams to wear theirs. Then, this whole celebration thing, it's gimmicky and tacky.
I can assure you, that's a recent [less than 10 years] development. Even now, you still have pockets of fans who, in the list of "things you would change about the NHL today" still bring up "home teams should wear white jerseys."As for the jersey thing - local fans like the dark/colour jerseys, it's been this way for a long time in sports.
There was an article where it was reported he "Ordered" Montreal to wear their Whites. Forget the name of the publisher.
because he owns the hurricanes ? and is now the chairman of the AAF with 250 million sunk into it ? if the AAF goes south, his money likely goes with it which could affect the canes.How is this a hockey-related news?
Happen a couple of times already this season frankly as a Habs fan I think ownership need to grow a spine and tell them to go to hell.He didn't "order the Habs" to do anything. He put in a request asking if his team could wear its red jerseys and the Canadiens wear their white jerseys; Montreal said OK and the NHL approved it.
And yes, Montreal could have told him no. Kind of like other teams have done with the same request.
The part about players not receiving their paycheck due to moving to a new pay system screams BS . It's the type of things you hear about from established US leagues years after they've made it in a historical documentary, where some old-timer goes on about "Can you believe this from where we are today? Man things were so bad we almost folded week 2 we seriously didn't have money to pay guys "
Why? It doesn't hurt anything.
Oh, I know, it looks weird, only the home teams are supposed to wear their colored jerseys, whites are for the road team. It was every bit of 10 years ago here that people were still upset about the switch of home teams wearing white and how Bettman was running yet another hockey "tradition." Because apparently about 30 years of "home wears white" that started because of TV made for more "tradition" than the 40 or so years prior when roads teams wore white.
It's not that big a deal. Like I said, if it was, teams would [and do] say no. If your hockey watching experience is ruined because of the color jersey your team is wearing that night, you have issues.
What are the factors that makes minor league hockey, baseball or hell soccer, work better than football?
Unaffiliated minor leagues generally don't do well with a few exceptions. Big leagues underwriting minor leagues accounts for a lot of it. The fact those leagues supply players willing to play for basically nothing for a shot at the big leagues helps. Football being what it is you don't see many leagues operating that pay nothing like you see in baseball. Football also only provides a handful of home dates in a season. If it's a league relying on gate you need a pretty big crowd. A minor league baseball team could play 45 home games and draw 160,000 at a touch above 3500 per game. A football team hosting 8 home games would have to draw 20,000 per to hit 160,000.
Believe the league that they aren't struggling to meet payroll?
Does anyone believe there are 20,000 (as AAF reported) at this game?