It's way too early to start saying that Lundestrom's development has been impeded. The only thing that we can say will absolutely do that is the pandemic, but that's across the board for prospects and players.
Interesting.
I'm bored. I'll take up this chore that Lundestrom's development has been impeded. Although I don't think it's impeded, but it's not a maximized progression.
Year | Team | League | Games | G | A | P | PPG | Plus/Minus |
2016 | Lulea HF J20 | SuperElit | 10 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.7 | 3 |
| Lulea HF | SHL | 45 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.133333 | -5 |
| Swe U18(all) | Inter-jr | 19 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.578947 | -2 |
Playoffs | Lulea HF J20 | | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Lulea HF | | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
We see that at a lower league, Isac produces on offense (SuperElit and Swe U18). Boot him up a league and he struggled. He's still a 16-year old at this point going against men in the SHL, the production might be predictable to come by.
Year | Team | League | Games | G | A | P | PPG | Plus/Minus |
2017 | Lulea HF | SHL | 42 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.357143 | 7 |
| Swe U20(all) | Inter-jr | 14 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.428571 | 6 |
| Sweden | International | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Playoffs | Lulea HF J20 | | 6 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.833333 | 4 |
| Lulea HF | | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
A second year into the SHL and Isac's offense has risen some. Remember, he's a 17-year old at this point. Still timid to shoot, but a +7 indicates he defense might be good since he isn't scoring often. When bumped up from U18 to U20 on international-jr play, Isac's scoring took a little hit, again, facing more talented competition. But when he played down in the SuperElit J20 team in the playoffs, his scoring once again took off.
We can surmise that his defense is too good at the lower levels, but his offense is still catching up. He's not a goal scorer by any means, but that playmaking ability is slowly developing at higher league levels. These were all written or said about him before the draft. He's the most ready NHL prospect due to his defense, but he's not playing on North American ice.
Drafted in 2018 | | | | | | | | |
Year | Team | League | Games | G | A | P | PPG | Plus/Minus |
2018 | Anaheim | NHL | 15 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.133333 | -1 |
| San Diego | AHL | 12 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.5 | -6 |
| Lulea HF | SHL | 17 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.529412 | 5 |
| Swe U20(all) | Inter-jr | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.5 | 2 |
| Sweden | International | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.75 | 5 |
Playoffs | Lulea HF | | 10 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.8 | 3 |
| San Diego | | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.428571 | -2 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Isac was Mr. Everywhere man in 2018. He was in the SHL before the draft, in Anaheim to start the NHL as an 18-year old, sent down to the AHL after 15 games, play in some international games, went across the pond back to the SHL, and then came back to North America to finish out his season in the AHL playoffs.
In the NHL, Isac meagerly generated offense, but was trusted on defense under Randy Carlyle. As expected, the offensive production did improve when he was sent down to the AHL, a lower league. When on loan back across the pond, it took some time for Lundestrom to become reacquainted again with his SHL team. You can see his offense begin to tick up on the regular season and improve into the playoffs along with better Plus/Minus ratings. On his way back to North America after his season was over with the SHL, Isac's offense struggled again.
His progression on NA ice wasn't impeded, but rather took a huge step backwards by being promoted to the NHL too soon. And once he crossed that 10-game threshold, Anaheim started his ELC as an 18-year old. The Ducks couldn't slide his contract any longer, to which Isac couldn't be stashed in the SHL for a couple of seasons.
Year | Team | League | Games | G | A | P | PPG | Plus/Minus |
2019 | Anaheim | NHL | 15 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.266667 | -2 |
| San Diego | AHL | 43 | 6 | 15 | 21 | 0.488372 | -6 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Isac's offense in the NHL went from near non-existent to a pittance. His AHL game also dropped a bit from his 2018 season.
Impede means to stop. Isac's development didn't just stop, but it also regressed once he was forced to start at the NHL as an 18-year old. Instead of being up for 9 games to get a feel for the NHL, the organization crossed that 10-game threshold. Sure, the Ducks could have have continued to loan Isac to his SHL club in 2019-20, but they didn't.
You cannot be content with a 0.133 offensive production in his rookie year in the AHL. Is going from 0.1333 to 0.2666 a great development improvement, at the cost of his defensive play regressing?
Anaheim jumped the gun on Isac and part of that factor was the mass injury hits at the center position. Isac's defensive prowess kept him up longer than any other prospect on the team save Comtois. And the only reason Comtois didn't play past 10 NHL games was because he got injured. Comtois was a 19-year old in 2018 and the Ducks did start his ELC on that 10th game, but did not make him eligible for the Seattle Expansion Draft.
Steel, Jones, Terry, Larsson, and Guhle are two years older than Lundestrom. Comtois is a year older than Lundestrom. Isac should have stayed across the pond for two years to develop over there and come over here as a more finished product rather than still struggled in year 2. Coming into the 2020-21 season, Lundestrom will start the hockey season as a 20-year old.
Now, for all the people who clamor that Zegras shouldn't stay in BU because there would be no talent there next season, then why couldn't that converse logic apply to Lundestrom? He was in a far better situation in the SHL than he was here in North America.