Aladyyn
they praying for the death of a rockstar
If you still live in 2016, sure.Lindholm is a top 15 dman Ristolainen is a #4 who bleeds shot attempts
If you still live in 2016, sure.Lindholm is a top 15 dman Ristolainen is a #4 who bleeds shot attempts
Oh I agree his job hasn’t been easy, but he performs like a non NHL level guy in his role. I do think he would be fine as a sheltered 4 or 5 though just he is hilariously miscast. He’s not as bad as the numbers suggest but still he’s not in the same stratosphere as Lindholm.We don't know what Risto is yet but your take is one I see a lot and will continue to refute.
Ristolainen has had literally the hardest minutes in the league on a horrible team since he was like 20. There is not another young D in the league currently who has had such a trial by fire introduction to the NHL. If there is, let's hear it. He has been played like he is an elite world class superstar defensemen while 95%+ of other young D get to ease into the league behind quality vets. He hasn't had a singular role and has had to play Vlasic-type minutes against the oppositions best players while also being leaned on heavily for production because the Sabres had no one else. It's not a total excuse and I'm not going to say he is a #1D or anything like that, but fact is he has been in a situation where many many very good defensemen would be exposed.
Id prob keep Lindholm even if the 1st overall was on the table tbh.
I do think Risto would benefit strongly playing along side Lindholm... could you imagine what theyd do for each others games.... hell risto would prob do well with fowler too.I wouldn't fault you. Its tough to give up sure things for potential.
This was the first year his relative shot numbers weren’t completely trash. His raw numbers remain putrid. He gets outperformed by Roman f***ing polak by some metrics at 5v5.If you still live in 2016, sure.
He's certainly a bit better in the offensive zone than Lindholm, defensively you're right obviously. I guess my point is that there are a lot of young D that we praise who would also perform like a non-NHL level player playing #1 minutes with Josh Gorges on the worst team in the league at 21. If Risto was in Anaheim playing alongside a rock like Josh Manson and with a minute muncher like Fowler ahead of him on the depth chart, then you would see very different results and might not dismiss him as a 4/5 guy.Oh I agree his job hasn’t been easy, but he performs like a non NHL level guy in his role. I do think he would be fine as a sheltered 4 or 5 though just he is hilariously miscast. He’s not as bad as the numbers suggest but still he’s not in the same stratosphere as Lindholm.
Well guess what. The team is trash. What a f***ing concept.This was the first year his relative shot numbers weren’t completely trash. His raw numbers remain putrid. He gets outperformed by Roman ****ing polak by some metrics at 5v5.
This was my thought as well, Ducks are one of the last teams i think of for needing defense.I think Risto would do well in Anaheim... but a trade doesn't really make sense from Anaheim perspective...
the pieces buffalo likely would want are likely not available(Lindholm/Rakell)… Even if buffalo wanted a futures package... that seems pretty dumb from Anaheim perspective when you look at the roster and our needs.... why pay for a defensemen when we clearly need help up front.
Defensively
Lindholm Manson
Fowler Montour
Larsson/Petterson/Welinski/Mahura
That's pretty good 8 defenders
Why can’t Reinhart carry themWell guess what. The team is trash. What a ****ing concept.
Literally only way it makes any sense is if were looking at moving manson/Montour somewhere else for a forward.This was my thought as well, Ducks are one of the last teams i think of for needing defense.
I'M LISTENING!!!!!Literally only way it makes any sense is if were looking at moving manson/Montour somewhere else for a forward.
Manson + Silf for nylander ;P assuming we got risto alreadyI'M LISTENING!!!!!
Huh....i don't hate that....Manson + Silf for nylander ;P assuming we got risto already
adding a top defensive winger(that puts in 40-50 points)… and a top notch shutdown dmen that can skate and play with a mean streak(and showed he has a little more offensive upside then people maybe gave him credit for)…. its not a bad move if the idea is trying to win a championship.... but any trade involving nylander is prob a tough 1 to pull the trigger on.Huh....i don't hate that....
Risto is one mean dude. Maybe the Ducks are looking to add toughness.
I prefer fowler over risto tbh... but I suppose if we added risto and rolled withDon't see how that makes sense for Anaheim they have a solid blue line that is still young. Unless they think they should swap Fowler out for him but I don't see it.
if we sign Tavares, i pull the trigger.adding a top defensive winger(that puts in 40-50 points)… and a top notch shutdown dmen that can skate and play with a mean streak(and showed he has a little more offensive upside then people maybe gave him credit for)…. its not a bad move if the idea is trying to win a championship.... but any trade involving nylander is prob a tough 1 to pull the trigger on.
I do think that's a move that makes Toronto a real threat in the east tho. And adding nylander/risto gives anaheims window a chance to reopen.
We don't know what Risto is yet but your take is one I see a lot and will continue to refute.
Ristolainen has had literally the hardest minutes in the league on a horrible team since he was like 20. There is not another young D in the league currently who has had such a trial by fire introduction to the NHL. If there is, let's hear it. He has been played like he is an elite world class superstar defensemen while 95%+ of other young D get to ease into the league behind quality vets. He hasn't had a singular role and has had to play Vlasic-type minutes against the oppositions best players while also being leaned on heavily for production because the Sabres had no one else. It's not a total excuse and I'm not going to say he is a #1D or anything like that, but fact is he has been in a situation where many many very good defensemen would be exposed.
Why are the Sabres dealing Ristolainen again? I thought they were looking forward to a defense core with Dahlin and Risto.