Fixing the D wasn't a huge priority then as it was once we signed Tavares. The Tavares signing bumped us from a developing team into a contender, you can't blame Lou for the D and Dubas is fixing it now
That might be true but Matthew's becomes the market setter...not the market followerImo the league has been over due for a contract rebalancing for a while. Middle tier guys like Marleau have maybe 1/4 of the on ice impact of the main guys yet still make 50% of the money.
I’d agree Matthews will be looking at a raise in 5 years but by then it’ll be more of the norm.
... the defense has always been the more pressing priority, even going back before Tavares was signed.
Our D was good enough pre-Tavares
How do you figure!?!?
This looks like praising Lou for being Lou without any substance
Oh but Muzzin was costly......
Does he need to own up to the issue with coaching? Definitely.
He got a top pairing D and he's being played like a #5D right now lol.
What are you talking about? Have you actually looked at Lou's tenure after the salary cap was implemented? It's abysmal, basically all around.
Yes he won a cup with the Devils, but most of the core was in place prior to the cap in 04/05.
Lou is pretty well known as a great goalie GM.
We had the same hole at RD when Lou was in charge. He didn't fix it. And this isn't to disparage him, he did a great job while he was here but he's not a magician.
He turned our team around.
Before him we were a DISASTER in net. He sorted that out in quick order and spent very little to do it. Less in comparison to what our young GM spent to get yet another LHD in our lineup instead of a RHD which is what was really needed.
He oversaw the drafting of franchise players in Marner and Matthews.
He signed key RFAs like Rielly and Kadri to team friendly deals that we are still benefiting from without having the negotiations disrupt the team. The young GM has butchered his RFA signings and still has a few to go.
Traded Dion and got assets back and didn't have to retain salary. Our young GM traded an elite goal scorer in Kessel with more value and had to eat salary, which continues to hurt us to this day.
He saw us improve in the standings every year. This year we are trending to show no improvement in the standings. Meanwhile the new team he went for will likely show dramatic improvement in standings when expectations were for the team to be a bottom feeder.
I could go on.
If you read what I said, I fully agree. It's his cap management and ability to maintain a team in Jersey during the cap era that had not been good.
He's always been fantastic with scouting, trades and development, but if you actually look at the moves he made as GM after Jersey's cup run, seems like he wasn't able to adapt to the changing game and cap system. Just a mans opinion.
From what I recall the team he built here was in the cap era. He left a 105 point team that was trending up. The new guy has flatlined us. Meanwhile Lou is potentially headed for a division title and a 20+ point turnaround. Also in the cap era.
One man giving facts
From what I recall the team he built here was in the cap era. He left a 105 point team that was trending up. The new guy has flatlined us. Meanwhile Lou is potentially headed for a division title and a 20+ point turnaround. Also in the cap era.
One man giving facts
Fairly absurd to claim Lou “built” the Leafs.
The best players on the team were either drafted before his hiring or were top 5 picks (unless you genuinely believe another GM wouldn’t have taken Matthews lol).
After Andersen (which he deserves credit for) his biggest personnel additions were Zaitsev and Marleau....
"The new guy has flatlined us". lol jeez that's just plain ridiculous.
But sure, lets take 2-3 years of inheriting a bottom feeder with a #1D already drafted, a 4th overall and 1st overall draft pick, and compare that to 14 years of not being able to ice a contender in New Jersey. Even the year they made the finals, no one even thought they had a chance of winning vs the Kings. Clarkson with 30+ goals ring a bell?
You're taking very circumstantial bits of information and using them to craft the story you want to tell, and it's painfully obvious what your bias is when you talk about a team that's trending around the top 2-5 spot in the league as a "flat lining" or neutral team.
I'm giving Lou credit from some of the good moves he did as the Leafs GM, but again, you need to view what he actually accomplished objectively, because making moves like drafting Matthews/Marner and the team improving every season during his tenure was unavoidable with the players we have being in the early 20s age bracket.
You realize that Dubas was an assistant GM on this team during that time right? How do you know some of these moves you are talking about weren't his own doing? That's why this argument is so ridiculous, you're talking about the man who signed the contract that was so bad and lopsided, the league had to fine the club for mismanaging their assets that poorly.
Fairly absurd to claim Lou “built” the Leafs.
The best players on the team were either drafted before his hiring or were top 5 picks (unless you genuinely believe another GM wouldn’t have taken Matthews lol).
After Andersen (which he deserves credit for) his biggest personnel additions were Zaitsev and Marleau....
Our rookie President should have given the veteran GM more time. Almost every move he made was a homerun. I can all but guarantee Matthews and Nylander would have been signed to cheaper deals with Lou at the helm. I would guess over the summer he would have addressed needs just like he did for the Isles.
He turned our team around.
Before him we were a DISASTER in net. He sorted that out in quick order and spent very little to do it. Less in comparison to what our young GM spent to get yet another LHD in our lineup instead of a RHD which is what was really needed.
He oversaw the drafting of franchise players in Marner and Matthews.
He signed key RFAs like Rielly and Kadri to team friendly deals that we are still benefiting from without having the negotiations disrupt the team. The young GM has butchered his RFA signings and still has a few to go.
Traded Dion and got assets back and didn't have to retain salary. Our young GM traded an elite goal scorer in Kessel with more value and had to eat salary, which continues to hurt us to this day.
He saw us improve in the standings every year. This year we are trending to show no improvement in the standings. Meanwhile the new team he went for will likely show dramatic improvement in standings when expectations were for the team to be a bottom feeder.
I could go on.
He turned our team around.
Before him we were a DISASTER in net. He sorted that out in quick order and spent very little to do it. Less in comparison to what our young GM spent to get yet another LHD in our lineup instead of a RHD which is what was really needed.
He oversaw the drafting of franchise players in Marner and Matthews.
He signed key RFAs like Rielly and Kadri to team friendly deals that we are still benefiting from without having the negotiations disrupt the team. The young GM has butchered his RFA signings and still has a few to go.
Traded Dion and got assets back and didn't have to retain salary. Our young GM traded an elite goal scorer in Kessel with more value and had to eat salary, which continues to hurt us to this day.
He saw us improve in the standings every year. This year we are trending to show no improvement in the standings. Meanwhile the new team he went for will likely show dramatic improvement in standings when expectations were for the team to be a bottom feeder.
I could go on.
Fairly absurd to claim Lou “built” the Leafs.
The best players on the team were either drafted before his hiring or were top 5 picks (unless you genuinely believe another GM wouldn’t have taken Matthews lol).
After Andersen (which he deserves credit for) his biggest personnel additions were Zaitsev and Marleau....
Lou had a year to sign Nylander to a deal and didn't get anything done.
You can't guarantee anything, no one can. There's no point in arguing about what a different GM could have done because we have literally zero way of knowing.
So the guy who they didnt keep on was making major decisions and the young kid was left running the farm team. And which cornerstone pieces? Obvious picks like Matthew's and Marner? Those were slam dunk selections.Because I know the history of the team.
Dubas and Hunter were co-GMs. Hunter was running the draft, Dubas was handling trades. This was widely reported (look it up if you don't believe me). Dubas was allowed to make one key trade and then almost immediately Lou was brought in. Hunter continued to keep his drafting position and with Lou's blessing brought in several cornerstone pieces. Dubas was relegated to the Marlies where he had no control over Leafs player personnel decisions.
Gives Lou credit for drafting Matthews and Marner
Doesn't give Dubas any credit for signing Tavares.
Classic.
I give him a lot of credit for the Dion trade as well, that looks ******* amazing right now
It's not a personnel addition but I'd call it addition by subtraction