Blue chip prospect
Elite prospect
A prospect
B prospect.
No shit... but levels are usually more complex than that. It doesn’t need to be more complex that it has to be, but people are like X was drafted 17th... he’s an A prospect. That’s rarely the case.
Blue Chip is used wildly wrong nowadays. I’ll do the flyers, one of the deepest and best farms in the league and some young NHLers:
Blue chip (A+) -> Usually a franchise player. They’re irreplaceable and standout across the draft. Usually a Captain level talent and leader. First liner or #1D that has a floor of a T4 Dman or T6 forward.
A -> Top level talent. T2 Dman or a 1st Line winter that would be a 2A given they played on the second line. Their floor could be a #4Dman or a high end M6 player. These players are good core pieces.
A- -> T4 Dman that most likely ends up as a #3/4 or a M6 forward that has enough upside to reach the 2nd line. A good complementary player, but isn’t irreplaceable. Can be used to complete or round out the core. Their floor - ceiling spread is higher than most like to admit due to sentimentality. Their floor is usually disappointing due to the hype they get.
B+ -> The most commonly overhyped prospect. Above average and has upside, just not what most tout them to be. Their upside in Jr or the AHL is usually what drives this overhype, but they’re still good prospects. Usually end up as a 3A/B | M6 forward and floor becomes B6 or higher end B6, but still a bottom 6 forward. For a Dman their upside is typically a #4, but would usually be a #4/5. Not much of a spread there. Floor is a bottom pairing Dman.
B -> The average archetype prospect. Non-deep prospect teams have most of their prospects in this range. Forwards have the upside of M6 as a 3rd liner. Maybe a checking forward or a role forward, but may be best suited on the 4th line. Dmen are usually a bottom pairing Dman... 5/6. Floor is a 7th Dman. B level prospects have a floor that is a borderline NHL player, but B level prospects have NHL talent.
B- -> Very meh. Usually overhyped B level prospects are here. 4th Line archetypes or #6 Dmen. Floor is in the AHL. Not a lot to build on here. On a decent team, they’d be in the AHL due to roster crunch.
C -> Not much NHL talent. Replacement level talent. You’re AHL player.
——————————————
Blue Chip: Never had one
A: Ivan Provorov, Carter Hart, Nolan Patrick?
A-: Travis Sanheim, Travis Konecny, Joel Farabee, Jay O’Brien, Phil Myers, Morgan Frost
B+: Oskar Lindblom, Wade Allison, Issac Ratcliffe, Tanner Laczynski, Fleix Sandstrom?
B: Samuel Errson, Sam Morin, German Rubtsov, Robert Hagg, Yegor Zamula, Wyatt Wylie, Wyatt Kalynuk, Mark Friedman, Mikhail Vorobyev, Adam Ginning, Matthew Strome, Ivan Fedotov, Nicolas Aube-Kubel?, Linus Hogberg?
B-: Noah Cates, Mike Vecchione, Olle Lycksell, Jack St. Ivany, Pascal Laberge, Cole Bardeau, Connor Bunnaman, Carsen Twarynski, Kirill Ustinenko
C: Jacob Graves, Tyrell Goulbourne, Gavin Hain, Malkin Sushko, David Bernhardt, Reece Wilcox, Brendan Warren, and basically the AHL team/vets.
**B level prospects are usually the ones that can see NHL time. They’re prospects though. Just because they were drafted in the top 25 doesn’t mean they’re automatically an A or even a B+. A lot of people on here automatically assume that. These are my rankings and I think it’s fairly accurate. We have a couple of first round picks as a B (one in the top 15) and a couple of 2nd rounders inside the top 50.
The leafs don’t have an A level prospect. They have some A- which isn’t anything gawk at. If you include Marner, Nylander, and Matthews in this... week then yes you have some A’s and A+/Bluechips.