I disagree atm. In 3-4 years yes. But for now he's a 3rd overall pick, we paid the high price to get him and he's paid solid top 6 money. He's a professional. I mean some guys here goes a long way to defend him. Everyone without exception will get criticized when they are not doing their job properly. That's life and that's fine. I've seen people shit on 16 years old for being 16 years old and learning how a cash register works. That's way worse than complaining about a professional hockey player not doing good enough for his salary.
Nobody forced him to sign. He signed. Now he get criticized for not delivering. People who attack him personally are wrong and disgusting. But i've not seen a lot of that personally. It's more the exception than the rule. People complain about the hockey player. I'm sorry but really guys a 4 goals season over 82 games for a guy his skills and TOI is simply unheard off outside of Gomez. He'll get some time off and that's fine too. But he'll have to either find a way to deliver on the ice or re-evaluate his salary next contract if he wants to avoid being criticized professionally speaking.
Nobody gets paid 5 millions a year because he has mental health issues (if this is his problem he might have a cancer too but i don't see why they would keep that secret). If he can't find a way to deliver he'll have to re-evaluate where he wants to play (which league) and for how much. Do people really think he's the first guy playing for this team with mental health issue (if this is the problem). I can say with very close to 100% certitude than Malakov was more than likely a depressive guy.
The way I see hockey personnaly and I've been watching hockey a long time.
A player is a type of player until he proves us otherwise.
Ex.
Suzuki is a 45 / 55 pts player until he proves us otherwise. Expecting more from him this year was not fair for himself and us because we actually don't know where is ceiling is. But expecting more is us going over where he proved us he could be. It's not because a player is trending up that he'll automatically get there. Especially if the opportunities and icetime he get is harder in the second go around.
Ex.
Kotkaniemi is a 35 / 45 pts player. Potential is just potential until the player taps into that, but the fact is. There is nothing assuring us that the player in itself can get to that potential. Expecting more from him at the beginning of the season was a big mistake on Bergevin's part. He could not even cut it in the NHL last year...
In Drouin's case, it's even clearer because he IS older. So our echantillon is even better. The trend in Drouin always seems to be a good/ok beginning of the season followed by an injury or a slump which always bring him around 50 pts season. It's been 4 years that he is on that pattern. Why expect more from him. Plus, it's not like we don't know that he is not a grits and guts guy and he is not a defensive stalwarts. He plays like that since he's born. Expecting otherwise from him is simply not fair.
When Drouin is put on a line, I personally expect an offensive player that can cost us defensively. What I also know is that he is almost as valuable as Gallagher for the team right now and the fact that he in not there is being felt as much as the absence of Gallagher. (52 / 58 pts player but scores more goal and is a grits and guts guy and better defensively).
I'd personally still rather have Drouin KK Toffoli or Drouin Suzuki Caufield or any offensive line we can put up than what we can offer right now. He brings what he can and not more. Expect him to be him, not the superstar that we thought he could be.