Dreger: Dorion looking to make another trade similar to Namestnikov

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
36,110
22,063
Visit site
What an absolute moron. The last thing they should be doing is trading assets for useless players. They already sit on 49 contracts and prospects that are supposed to be playing are healthy scratches in the AHL because they have so many bad NHL players taking up roster spots. They should be trying to do the opposite.

Get this guy away from the franchise.
 

DJB

Registered User
Jan 6, 2009
16,185
10,514
twitter.com
It will be a player that was already waived or is on an ELC that's been a dissapointment thus far.

Very little draft pivk value will be moved by Ottawa to make a deal
 

Ser Grogu

Dank farrik
Aug 6, 2009
2,631
1,340
i bet Sens trade for Ho-Sang. just a feeling
ev6oy7f.png
 

Hossa

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
9,652
283
Abroad
Visit site
Classic Dorion asset management. Burns contract spots on guys like Ennis and Sabourin, passes on using his last contract to claim Sprong, Baertschi, Goldobin or Ho-Sang on waivers, and then a couple weeks later looking to give up assets for cheap forward help.
 

Sting

Registered User
Feb 8, 2004
7,914
2,914
It's true. He had to have known some quality players would be on waivers early in the year. It makes zero sense to pay money and burn contract spots on some of these guys. There are quite a few examples, including some on our team, of players who have turned it around when given an opportunity.
 

tmg

Registered User
Jul 10, 2003
2,752
1,276
Ottawa
What an absolute moron. The last thing they should be doing is trading assets for useless players.

looking to give up assets for cheap forward help.

You're both missing the point. When all is said and done, they'll be UP net futures assets, not down, after Namestnikov and any other player they're seeking comes and goes.

That's the plan here: early season, buy-low on a last-year-of-contract guy buried on another team's depth chart. Give that player ample ice time in Ottawa where simply by virtue of being given opportunities (like PP time) he had long since stopped getting in his previous team, he starts looking like a decent player again. Then come February, once the player has a decent stat line and only a couple months of contract left and teams in playoffs spots are seeking to add depth without commitment, trade the player away for more assets than they paid to bring them in.

There's no actual relevant giving up of assets here, like you two are implying. The net assets in will be greater than the net assets out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SNES

Bevans

Registered User
Apr 15, 2016
2,648
2,330
Don't see how you could be against another Namestikov trade. At this rate he's going to be turned into a 2nd or two mid picks at the deadline. Hopefully by then some of these AHL players are ready to step in and finish the season strong.

For once Melnyk spends a bit of money to grow an asset and he's still slammed for it. He deserves credit where it's due.
 

ViewsFromThe6ix

Zachary on the Attackary
Oct 17, 2013
10,884
4,891
6ix
Don't see how you could be against another Namestikov trade. At this rate he's going to be turned into a 2nd or two mid picks at the deadline. Hopefully by then some of these AHL players are ready to step in and finish the season strong.

For once Melnyk spends a bit of money to grow an asset and he's still slammed for it. He deserves credit where it's due.

If he were willing to spend the money, why didn't they trade for Marleau and take the first round pick (or slightly less)?
 

Kelly

Registered User
Nov 12, 2012
14,894
7,472
This has Nic Petan written all over it.

Probably could be had for dirt cheap.
 

Bevans

Registered User
Apr 15, 2016
2,648
2,330
If he were willing to spend the money, why didn't they trade for Marleau and take the first round pick (or slightly less)?

He wasn't. That's the point.

Besides he'll pay significantly less for Namestikov. We can compare the respective ROIs once we know how much he spent on Namestikov and what the Senators gets for him
 

supsens

Registered User
Oct 6, 2013
6,577
2,000
He wasn't. That's the point.

Besides he'll pay significantly less for Namestikov. We can compare the respective ROIs once we know how much he spent on Namestikov and what the Senators gets for him

How do you know? Toronto might have chosen who gets the first after nobody else did it for a second rounder. It’s not just up to the sens who gets what in the NHL
Boston is the last place they would ever give a first too followed by Montreal then Ottawa
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad