mashedpotato
full stack.
- Jan 10, 2012
- 2,153
- 385
It's all stick checks, speed and agility from here boys.
Becoming less and less of a contact sport.
Becoming less and less of a contact sport.
I didn't read anything after this post because it is spot on. Size does and doesn't matter. If all else is equal between two players you are always going to pick the bigger player.It’s a tool. You want players with as many tools as possible.
Either way being big would still be an advantage in a "non contact" league because you can use your superior reach to protect the puck from people.It's all stick checks, speed and agility from here boys.
Becoming less and less of a contact sport.
The Devils of the 90's were a huge team, yes.
The Avs were above average size but nothing to write home about. The Stars weren't a big team at all.
The Habs and Oilers dynasties had size in the bottom six but all of their star players were very small.
The only bonafide dynasty that had a really big roster were the 80's Islanders. All the others were pretty small unless you count the Devils as a dynasty.
The late 90's and early 00's Red Wings were also not a big team.
I have a feeling measurements used back then were with out skates. seems like nowadays measurements are with skates.Messier 6'1
Kurri 6'1
Tikkanen 6'1
They were all 200+ lbs too. Not exactly small for the time.
Until the playoffs start.It's all stick checks, speed and agility from here boys.
Becoming less and less of a contact sport.
Are we, though?We are seeing the game rapidly transition from big hulking meatheads like Lucic dominating to small agile quick honey badgers like Yamamoto taking over.
It's all stick checks, speed and agility from here boys.
Becoming less and less of a contact sport.
and what would you consider that to be? 5'8"?There is a certain size below which a player is basically useless at the NHL level.