Dont necessarily think he should have been hired in the first place.
It is the consistency aspect for us. Two weeks ago, we were riding a 5 game win streak, where I (and others) thought that it would be extremely unlikely to not make the playoffs.
Now, we are back in that same boat of not really knowing what we have to work with and what we are doing to move the needle in the proper direction. Coaching is a chess match/poker game in some ways - all about finding openings and understanding where weaknesses and strengths lie and how to exploit that. Some of our issue is that we have to rely on young players with some major talent who are still putting it together, and veterans who have some talent, but are still relatively average in that regard (compare our roster of players with more than 300 games of NHL experience to other team's rosters with the same games played metric, and we will see a glaring difference in talent). Its the same thing that had been said with the previous coach - we are doing the best we can with a depleted level of talent. Now that more talent is here, it is a matter of getting them to play to that level consistently. We need a "star" player in the worst way. Strome wasn't it. Keller may be on his way there.
No issues with what Chayka is doing. It's the whole "you have to spend money to make money" idea. We have to lose talent to return talent. I think the bigger thing is how do we make Arizona into the location that people want to stay in? Remember Domi in the draft? "Arizona. Sick, man." He was GENUINELY excited to play here. That has gone in the opposite direction and I am thinking that it may be like that for many young players. Chayka has made moves to get rid of players that dont want to be here, so it is hard enough to extract value when you have a good player that wants to stay.