Not that you're wrong (I agree with Zubov being a HoFer) but all of the stats you listed are conjecture or wholy unrelated to why he should be in the Hall.
Top 17 in Norris voting? Who the hell measures it like that?
Probably faced anti-Russian voters? How on Earth do you go about measuring something like that?
And again with Gonchar... Why are you using weird numbers to justify it? Once you get past the top 5 for a postseason award, votes for it really don't matter at all.
Further, wasn't the All Star game completely fan voted? Didn't John Scott win All-Star MVP once? All Star selections are bullcrap. Zubov has a case on his black and white statistical numbers. He has a case because of those two Cups. When you bend it and use weird things to try to make it look better, you're inadvertently casting aspersions on the dude's career.
Zubov was a fabulous defenseman who kept up with Lidstrom offensively and was still good defensively. He's worthy of consideration because his stats make him so and he was routinely a key cog on winning hockey teams.
Sergei Zubov Stats | Hockey-Reference.com
Just as valid as what you used... look at the similarity scores who Zubov's career was most like. Of his closest contemporaries statistically the only ones not in the hall of fame are those not eligible to be elected yet.