He's fourth all-time in playoff goals per game. Period. You want numbers? How's that for a number?
1991? He was the best player in the playoffs. Pittsburgh was done until Samuelsson kneed Cam. The entire complexion of that series changed after that hit. Pittsburgh had no other way of stopping Neely.
Neely, Bourque and Moog were the difference for Boston in 1990. They were brilliant. Without them, that's a Boston team that maybe gets out of the first round.
But look beyond the numbers, and watch his performance in 1988. Boston hadn't defeated Montreal in the post-season in 40 years. Neely was a second team all-star in 88, but he really took his play to another level in that playoff series against Montreal. The Habs had no answer for Neely, and that 40-year drought was over. Interesting to note that the Bruins haven't defeated the Habs in a series without Neely as an active player in the organization since 1948.
As for the Neely/Lindros debate, two difference makers: playoffs and character. Neely was a much better player in the playoffs than Lindros (even through Lindros might have better numbers). Also, the name Eric Lindros conjures up a lot of negatives to a lot of people. You can't say the same about Neely. Character won't keep a sure-fire HHOFer out. But it will keep a borderline candidate out.
Being a Habs fanin the late 80's/early 90's, I remeber all those serie's Montreal playerd vs. Boston like it was yesterday. And I tell you, I respected Bourque and Moog a lot. They were great players. But I absolutley FEARED Neely. He was amazing against the Habs in that time period. Like you said, we had nothing that could stop him.
I'm not saying Neely was better than Bourque by any stretch, but my God, Neely was so dominant during that time period.