I'm not "pretending" anything.
You dismissed another band for not being "rock" because they weren't blues-based while simultaneously trumpeting Rush as a great rock band even though they aren't blues based either.
you're fighting a losing battle here in my opinion...not sure you understand your music history all too well
from the Rush wikipedia page
Musical style and influences[edit]
Rush's musical style had changed substantially over the years. Its debut album was strongly influenced by British blues-based hard rock: an amalgam of sounds and styles from such rock bands as
Black Sabbath,
the Who,
Cream and
Led Zeppelin.
[14][87][88] Rush became increasingly influenced by bands of the British progressive rock movement, especially
Genesis,
Yes and
Jethro Tull.
[89][90] In the tradition of progressive rock, Rush wrote extended songs with irregular and shifting
time signatures, combined with fantasy and science fiction-themed lyrics. In the 1980s, Rush merged their sound with the trends of this period, experimenting with new wave, reggae and
pop rock.
[91] This period included the band's most extensive use of instruments such as synthesizers,
sequencers, and electronic percussion. In the early 1990s, the band transformed their style once again to harmonize with the
alternative rock movement.
[92]
on too the subject of talent....you see above there where they talk about shifting influences, the move from blues based rock to prog rock, on to reggae and then to alt rock. As an amateur musician myself ....do you have any idea how challenging that is? Moving from genre to genre and playing at a professional level? Rush is an extremely talented band and i'm not even a fan.....every band mentioned here I've either seen or I've seen the principal musicians in some downstream other compilation of musicians...except Rush. They just never did it for me....but you're kidding yourself not recognizing their talent.