It's insane how short sighted people are when it comes to goaltender. There's no goaltender, it could be Prime Marty, Hasek , Roy that would succeed with that kind of ****ty defensive structure.
When Blackwood numbers will eventually start to come down, I can't wait to see how quick this whole ship is going to turn around and start blaming him.
It's insane how short sighted people are when it comes to goaltender. There's no goaltender, it could be Prime Marty, Hasek , Roy that would succeed with that kind of ****ty defensive structure.
When Blackwood numbers will eventually start to come down, I can't wait to see how quick this whole ship is going to turn around and start blaming him.
Carolina will also have better choices in the offseason when they'd actually go looking for a goalie, and I think they have at least one guy (Nedeljkovic) that they're trying to develop.
And you keep giving KK's record 'without facing the top teams' this year but his record 'other than' the 16-3-1 stretch last year is just meh if we're going to play that game.
He won't get blame but he's also gonna get more slack being a kid and the shiny new prospect. KK was never really supposed to be a starting goalie, they've already gotten more return on investment than could ever have been hoped for but his career numbers have really been up and down.
In my findings this year, there's been a few deviations. Both Rask and Halak have looked worse than their save percentage indicates.I'll admit I haven't watched a ton of Bruins games - only highlights really. From what I've seen Halak has been pretty good, I thought. That said -
what you are doing with Halak then - is proving one or both of my points: that #1, his terrible SV% last year was likely because of the defense (or maybe he's a crappy goalie?). #2, his SV% this year is inflated and doesn't tell the whole tale... and in both cases SV% is highly dependent upon the play in front of him. Right? No? Can't be both ways:
2017: Bad goalie bad SV% or bad defense, mediocre goalie, bad SV%
2018: Bad goalie good SV% or good defense, mediocre goalie, good SV%.
I'm sure you can have bad goalie bad SV%, and good goalie, good SV% - but I'm just saying it is mutable.
Context is needed here.He won’t.
The devils are 37-36-10 since the start of the year. Kinkaid is 33-17-9 during that time. Goalies not named Kinkaid are 4-19-1. But a bad stretch against tough competition is more important than these facts.
Over not starting one game? You really think he's gonna refuse to sign if we don't start him the next game?i don’t think it’s very likely that kinkaid re-signs. if he doesn’t start the next game, i think he’s as good as gone
Over not starting one game? You really think he's gonna refuse to sign if we don't start him the next game?
I think he could be in tomorrow, for what it's worth.
It’s pretty clear what is going on here. Keith can do no wrong apparently, and the idea of a kid coming in and playing better then him bugs some people.
is that a reference to my post? if blackwood keeps playing like this, i think we should trade kinkaid if we can. we definitely shouldn’t re-sign him. doesn’t bug me
I don't think it's a good idea to put all our eggs into the basket of a goalie that's one year removed from being demoted out of the AHL. I don't have faith that Corey's going to regain his form, so my preference is to run Blackwood and Kinkaid as 1a and 1b options, especially if Kinky doesn't gain us a significant return.is that a reference to my post? if blackwood keeps playing like this, i think we should trade kinkaid if we can. we definitely shouldn’t re-sign him. doesn’t bug me
It’s pretty clear what is going on here. Keith can do no wrong apparently, and the idea of a kid coming in and playing better then him bugs some people.
I don't think it's a good idea to put all our eggs into the basket of a goalie that's one year removed from being demoted out of the AHL. I don't have faith that Corey's going to regain his form, so my preference is to run Blackwood and Kinkaid as 1a and 1b options, especially if Kinky doesn't gain us a significant return.
It’s pretty clear what is going on here. Keith can do no wrong apparently, and the idea of a kid coming in and playing better then him bugs some people.
Because Marty, Hasek and Roy were not all a f*** of a lot better than Keith Kinkaid or whatever is left of Cory Schneider's bone dust?It's insane how short sighted people are when it comes to goaltender. There's no goaltender, it could be Prime Marty, Hasek , Roy that would succeed with that kind of ****ty defensive structure.
When Blackwood numbers will eventually start to come down, I can't wait to see how quick this whole ship is going to turn around and start blaming him.
You may wind up being right, but if you are right, it will be because Blackwood really isn't that good or just isn't ready to be a good NHL goalie yet.not sure how youve come to this conclusion. i really like blackwood and what he brings. its just the fact people think there are a good amount of goalies that would produce better than kinkaid when thats not the case. if and when blackwood falls back down to earth it will look a lot like when kinkaid has struggled and schneider has looked awful.
Cory's getting bought out or LTIR'd after this year.well yeah true, my post was assuming a couple of things:
-cory’s not going anywhere
-kinkaid won’t want to have to compete with 2 other goalies for playing time
if either of those assumptions are incorrect then yeah we have some other options
You may wind up being right, but if you are right, it will be because Blackwood really isn't that good or just isn't ready to be a good NHL goalie yet.
But nobody is gonna keep stopping pucks at the rate Blackwood did before last game.
And nobody's saying the defense hasn't been bad for the goalies, but by the same token goalies (like coaches) don't get opportunities on good teams if they just play to the mean on bad teams.
I wouldn't mind this being next year's tandem, but only if Blackwood can continue to look pretty good.i dont think thats the case. i would be happy if blackwood performs slightly better for the rest of the year. hes not going to face anywhere near the competition keith did in the first half. if he performs above that, ill be ecstatic. i also think keith will step it up as well. should be a good tandem going forward.
and agreed on the second point because blackwood would be an all time great if he played like he has the past five games throughout his career. and people are crazy to think i wouldnt love to see that happen.