Does not have to be.
I would trade Cory for a completely different reason:
We already have Kinkid for free. That is a contender goalie under the right defense. Why have 2 awesome goalies and no offensive forwards? The balance is not there.
The problem with NJD is their over the board defensive style. No balance. Every player on that team is defense minded, including the forwards. Defense minded forwards will never score a lot, as their talent is divided (2 way forwards). Hence, so little goals.
Welcome to the board! Don't think I've spoken to you before.
Some thoughts I have in response to your post follow:
1) Kinkaid is a UFA this summer, so first we have to re-sign him, which I don't think will be to complicated, but Schneider is already signed long-term through what we can project to be prime years, and Kinkaid isn't.
2) Kinkaid has only played in about a dozen NHL games. I'm happy with his performance, but I'm not going to rely on him to emerge into an elite goalie like Schneider already is when I make a decision about the future's organization. If Kinkaid does emerge over a long sample size of games (for instance, if he backs up Schneider all throughout Schneider's contract and performs at a high level), then the organization near the end of Cory's contract could face a decision about which goalie they want to rely on going forward and which goalie they might be able to explore trade options with. To me, though, it really doesn't make sense to trade Schneider because we have Kinkaid until around the trade deadline of Cory's last season under contract, but that's only if Kinkaid emerges as a truly elite goalie in that timeframe.The time to trade Cory, if at all, is years out, in my opinion.
3) After this draft, I'm pretty confident that we will have a talented young forward, whether acquired by our top pick (which I think is most likely) or by a trade. The forward probably won't be NHL ready this year, but in a year or two would probably be ready to start making an impact. And if we struggle again next year, we're looking at another high draft pick that would likely be a forward. If elite forwards really are the answer to everything, we're acquiring them in the most reliable way (early draft picks), but unlike Edmonton, we have a goalie and defense core in place, so we could actually use the elite forwards to form a contending team.
4) I really don't have a quibble with a defensive style. The LA Kings were also built from the net out (same model Lou uses) and they are reigning Stanley Cup Champions. A team doesn't have to be built with a defensive style in order to win, but it definitely can be. The Devils organization has established an identity rooted in strong defense and goaltending. Within that template, the Devils have found success in the past and are laying the foundation to hopefully have more success within that framework again. It will take time to build, but it will take even longer if we knock over the bricks that we've already cemented in place and try to build a completely foreign structure. There's really no need to change what has made this organization successful in the past when other teams show that the model still is relevant. In fact, I would argue that the decreased scoring throughout the league illustrates that the importance of defense and goaltending is on the rise again. Bottom line is that I don't think the Devils are going to change their organizational philosophy (nor should they really), so fans should embrace the philosophy and not expect an interest in high-octane offense to take center stage.
5) I would make a distinction between true two-way forwards (guys like Toews, Bergeron, Kesler, Kopitar, and Datsyuk, etc.) and pure defensive/checking forwards. I think two-way forward has become something of a dirty word among Devils fans because the Devils have had a glut of pure defensive/checking forwards and a shortage of true two-way forwards recently. True two-way forwards are equally competent to elite offensively and defensively and now how to translate from defense to offense and vice versa so neither side of their game suffers. True two-way forwards are very talented, so they can be hard to find, but when you have one or two on your team, you are looking at a player who can be very valuable in pursuit of a championship. Basically, the problem with the Devils is we have too many pure checking forwards and not enough true two-way forwards. The problem is with the personnel, not the philosophy about two-way play.
Just my thoughts, and welcome again!