AfroThunder396
[citation needed]
Not that I want to defend Grabner, but he's very good on the PK and Stafford is completely out of his element on the PP.last 5 games
staff- 0g 3a +3
grab- 0g 1a -3
back to you- what is grabner providing?
Not that I want to defend Grabner, but he's very good on the PK and Stafford is completely out of his element on the PP.last 5 games
staff- 0g 3a +3
grab- 0g 1a -3
back to you- what is grabner providing?
Not that I want to defend Grabner, but he's very good on the PK and Stafford is completely out of his element on the PP.
You’re honestly basing his PK ability on 2 games? Good lord. He was very good on the PK down the stretch for us. I don’t care if he comes back in because he’s been bad, but he’s a good penalty killer.that would be nice if it were true, but our PK was running at 25% (i think) with grabner on it. not saying it's all his fault, but still. he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and i'd be happy to never see him play another game for us
that would be nice if it were true, but our PK was running at 25% (i think) with grabner on it. not saying it's all his fault, but still. he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and i'd be happy to never see him play another game for us
You’re honestly basing his PK ability on 2 games? Good lord. He was very good on the PK down the stretch for us. I don’t care if he comes back in because he’s been bad, but he’s a good penalty killer.
You're literally not making any sense whatsoever. Not even a little bit. And you're arguing with yourself.the goal posts some of you are moving are going to get frequent flier miles soon. ‘the trade was a psychological win!’ ‘he’s very very fast!’ ‘offensive depth!’ ‘he’s a brilliant penalty killer….no no, not in the playoffs, but in the regular season!’ lol. our PK looked no worse tonight than it did with grabner in it in the first 2 games. actually, the penalty kill where we had multiple shorthanded opportunities (right before hall’s goal) turned the game around for us, while grabner was off eating cookies and ice cream in the stands.
he’s a black hole of **** and provides almost nothing of value, and he shouldn’t play for us again.
Par for the course I suppose, even when we win people still whineYou're literally not making any sense whatsoever. Not even a little bit. And you're arguing with yourself.
You're literally not making any sense whatsoever. Not even a little bit. And you're arguing with yourself.
Par for the course I suppose, even when we win people still whine
so you’d dress him for game 4 then?
I don't really care if Stafford, Grabner, Gibbons, or Bratt is in the final spot. None have been very good and none will log many minutes. But you keep trying to relitigate the trade. Like if Grabner keeps playing bad that makes it a moronic trade. It doesn't. The trade obviously hasn't worked, but that doesn't make it a bad move on paper or the wrong decision at the time. It just didn't work, oh well. I'm gonna enjoy the playoff run, I don't give half a **** about a 2nd round pick or some Russian.
so you’d dress him for game 4 then?
not whining at all. i’m glad he wasn’t playing, we somehow won without his speed and elite PK skills. i just don’t want him back in the lineup. and if anyone can make a case for playing him, i’d (still) love to hear it
Is the PK problem a personnel issue or a systems one though? I mean yeah, certain players are better at PK than others, but there are still 4 other players on the ice (including the goalie) that PK also
Our PK has a personnel issue on defense more than anything but there's really no other options. When John Moore is getting regular PK time, and I can't honestly see an argument for someone else which is sad, we're going to be in trouble.
I still can't get over Lovejoy's pathing on that first goal. A guy right in front of the net and he decides the best route is to go behind the net first. I don't even know if he would've made it in time but at least give yourself a chance
Because Greene was in the box, the Devils went RHD-RHD on that 1st PK unit and I think both guys got confused. Lovejoy would not have made it to the front in time anyway.
There was someone on the point - Just not in a spot to slide to from the middle. Lovejot was at fault toolovejoy and coleman both f'd up on that pk. coleman started drifting towards the point when there was no one even there, and he was the most able to get in front and break up that pass. lovejoy should have never drifted that far from the net anyway though, and then to go behind when there were to open men in front was just dumb
Yeah this is a really dumb take. The PK is also at 25% with Zajac on it, should we scratch him too? Should we scratch Coleman? A 2 game sample size is worthless.that would be nice if it were true, but our PK was running at 25% (i think) with grabner on it. not saying it's all his fault, but still. he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and i'd be happy to never see him play another game for us
Is the PK problem a personnel issue or a systems one though? I mean yeah, certain players are better at PK than others, but there are still 4 other players on the ice (including the goalie) that PK also