Devils 2017-18 team discussion (player news and notes) VIII - Postseason Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

MartyOwns

thank you shero
Apr 1, 2007
24,202
17,994
Not that I want to defend Grabner, but he's very good on the PK and Stafford is completely out of his element on the PP.

that would be nice if it were true, but our PK was running at 25% (i think) with grabner on it. not saying it's all his fault, but still. he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and i'd be happy to never see him play another game for us
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,080
48,283
NJ
that would be nice if it were true, but our PK was running at 25% (i think) with grabner on it. not saying it's all his fault, but still. he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and i'd be happy to never see him play another game for us
You’re honestly basing his PK ability on 2 games? Good lord. He was very good on the PK down the stretch for us. I don’t care if he comes back in because he’s been bad, but he’s a good penalty killer.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,910
44,461
PA
that would be nice if it were true, but our PK was running at 25% (i think) with grabner on it. not saying it's all his fault, but still. he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and i'd be happy to never see him play another game for us

wait, what? the PK improved once they got Grabner. Down the stretch it was very good.

the PK right now in this series is running at 28.5%. They need to try something different.
 

MartyOwns

thank you shero
Apr 1, 2007
24,202
17,994
You’re honestly basing his PK ability on 2 games? Good lord. He was very good on the PK down the stretch for us. I don’t care if he comes back in because he’s been bad, but he’s a good penalty killer.

the goal posts some of you are moving are going to get frequent flier miles soon. ‘the trade was a psychological win!’ ‘he’s very very fast!’ ‘offensive depth!’ ‘he’s a brilliant penalty killer….no no, not in the playoffs, but in the regular season!’ lol. our PK looked no worse tonight than it did with grabner in it in the first 2 games. actually, the penalty kill where we had multiple shorthanded opportunities (right before hall’s goal) turned the game around for us, while grabner was off eating cookies and ice cream in the stands.

he’s a black hole of shit and provides almost nothing of value, and he shouldn’t play for us again.
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,080
48,283
NJ
the goal posts some of you are moving are going to get frequent flier miles soon. ‘the trade was a psychological win!’ ‘he’s very very fast!’ ‘offensive depth!’ ‘he’s a brilliant penalty killer….no no, not in the playoffs, but in the regular season!’ lol. our PK looked no worse tonight than it did with grabner in it in the first 2 games. actually, the penalty kill where we had multiple shorthanded opportunities (right before hall’s goal) turned the game around for us, while grabner was off eating cookies and ice cream in the stands.

he’s a black hole of **** and provides almost nothing of value, and he shouldn’t play for us again.
You're literally not making any sense whatsoever. Not even a little bit. And you're arguing with yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeysFinest

MartyOwns

thank you shero
Apr 1, 2007
24,202
17,994
You're literally not making any sense whatsoever. Not even a little bit. And you're arguing with yourself.

so you’d dress him for game 4 then?

Par for the course I suppose, even when we win people still whine

not whining at all. i’m glad he wasn’t playing, we somehow won without his speed and elite PK skills. i just don’t want him back in the lineup. and if anyone can make a case for playing him, i’d (still) love to hear it
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,080
48,283
NJ
so you’d dress him for game 4 then?

I don't really care if Stafford, Grabner, Gibbons, or Bratt is in the final spot. None have been very good and none will log many minutes. But you keep trying to relitigate the trade. Like if Grabner keeps playing bad that makes it a moronic trade. It doesn't. The trade obviously hasn't worked, but that doesn't make it a bad move on paper or the wrong decision at the time. It just didn't work, oh well. I'm gonna enjoy the playoff run, I don't give half a **** about a 2nd round pick or some Russian.
 

MartyOwns

thank you shero
Apr 1, 2007
24,202
17,994
I don't really care if Stafford, Grabner, Gibbons, or Bratt is in the final spot. None have been very good and none will log many minutes. But you keep trying to relitigate the trade. Like if Grabner keeps playing bad that makes it a moronic trade. It doesn't. The trade obviously hasn't worked, but that doesn't make it a bad move on paper or the wrong decision at the time. It just didn't work, oh well. I'm gonna enjoy the playoff run, I don't give half a **** about a 2nd round pick or some Russian.

i dont even care about the trade, it's over and done with. i don't agree with the logic behind it, but if you do then bully for you. what i care about is how we go forward. hynes earned a lot of my respect for benching his worthless ass, and now that mojo is back (and assuming the team stays helathy) i don't want to see him again. that's all
 

OmNomNom

Taco is Love, Taco is Life
Mar 3, 2011
22,991
15,851
In the Church of Salmela
Is the PK problem a personnel issue or a systems one though? I mean yeah, certain players are better at PK than others, but there are still 4 other players on the ice (including the goalie) that PK also
 

Cheddabombs

Status Quo
Mar 13, 2012
24,710
31,425
Our PK has a personnel issue on defense more than anything but there's really no other options. When John Moore is getting regular PK time, and I can't honestly see an argument for someone else which is sad, we're going to be in trouble.

I still can't get over Lovejoy's pathing on that first goal. A guy right in front of the net and he decides the best route is to go behind the net first. I don't even know if he would've made it in time but at least give yourself a chance
 

Burner Account

Registered User
Feb 14, 2008
37,418
1,744
I'm glad they scratched him because he's earned it, but how can you say a guy who's pretty much a lock for a breakaway every 1-2 games brings absolutely nothing to the table?
 

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,436
16,294
Ocean County
so you’d dress him for game 4 then?



not whining at all. i’m glad he wasn’t playing, we somehow won without his speed and elite PK skills. i just don’t want him back in the lineup. and if anyone can make a case for playing him, i’d (still) love to hear it

I don’t even know who you’re talking about, I wasn’t really saying what I said about you but more of a general statement.
 

135ace

Registered User
Mar 18, 2015
1,734
850
Is the PK problem a personnel issue or a systems one though? I mean yeah, certain players are better at PK than others, but there are still 4 other players on the ice (including the goalie) that PK also

Our PK against Tampa has not been aggressive enough, especially on Kuch. We just give him so much time that it's easy for him to find an open guy or make a pass for a tip or redirection, especially when our D is hot garbage.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,910
44,461
PA
I notice that the one Tampa forward slides across the face of the net and our DMan always follows him, leaving the opposite side wide open. This happened explicitly on the Stamkos goal last night. Lovejoy followed Miller even though Greene was already on that side and left the backdoor wide open
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpeakingOfTheDevils

SpeakingOfTheDevils

Devils Advocate
Jan 22, 2010
15,645
7,881
Philadelphia, PA
Lovejoy has been awful. There's just no way you can watch the games and conclude otherwise. He's a stagnant, skill-less liability. No other way to phrase it, really.

He can't be anything more than a 7D next year that rotates in for injury/rest. He just isn't capable of playing a more significant NHL role anymore.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,523
13,882
Our PK has a personnel issue on defense more than anything but there's really no other options. When John Moore is getting regular PK time, and I can't honestly see an argument for someone else which is sad, we're going to be in trouble.

I still can't get over Lovejoy's pathing on that first goal. A guy right in front of the net and he decides the best route is to go behind the net first. I don't even know if he would've made it in time but at least give yourself a chance

Because Greene was in the box, the Devils went RHD-RHD on that 1st PK unit and I think both guys got confused. Lovejoy would not have made it to the front in time anyway.
 

Cheddabombs

Status Quo
Mar 13, 2012
24,710
31,425
Because Greene was in the box, the Devils went RHD-RHD on that 1st PK unit and I think both guys got confused. Lovejoy would not have made it to the front in time anyway.

Yea I don't think he would've anyway but like I said, at least give yourself a chance there. I don't buy the confusion in that scenario though. There's a guy wide open in front, it should just be instinct to go directly to him. Oh well

Another side note, sorry I'm all over the place this morning lol. But getting a full season (hopefully) of MoJo next year is going to be huge. When he's played so few games for us this year it's easy to forgot how good he is. He's a legit too 6 winger that plays exactly our style. Man I love the direction we're going in!!
 

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,574
6,937
lovejoy and coleman both f'd up on that pk. coleman started drifting towards the point when there was no one even there, and he was the most able to get in front and break up that pass. lovejoy should have never drifted that far from the net anyway though, and then to go behind when there were to open men in front was just dumb
 

Oneiro

Registered User
Mar 28, 2013
9,439
11,010
I think the bigger thing is that the team doesn't take way the second passing option in the neutral zone.

What you'll see Tampa do is the puck carrier will fake or lean towards one (more obvious) passing option, our defender will close that gap off but in doing so has left enough space to give the second option an easy entry into setting up in our d-zone. The support from the other checkers coming back needs to be a bit smarter.
 

Nico the Draft Riser

Devils, Rams, Hawks, Twins fan
Nov 18, 2017
3,351
1,364
lovejoy and coleman both f'd up on that pk. coleman started drifting towards the point when there was no one even there, and he was the most able to get in front and break up that pass. lovejoy should have never drifted that far from the net anyway though, and then to go behind when there were to open men in front was just dumb
There was someone on the point - Just not in a spot to slide to from the middle. Lovejot was at fault too
 

AfroThunder396

[citation needed]
Jan 8, 2006
39,124
23,165
Miami, FL
that would be nice if it were true, but our PK was running at 25% (i think) with grabner on it. not saying it's all his fault, but still. he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and i'd be happy to never see him play another game for us
Yeah this is a really dumb take. The PK is also at 25% with Zajac on it, should we scratch him too? Should we scratch Coleman? A 2 game sample size is worthless.

I have no issue with him getting scratched a game here or there to wake him up but he should be playing. With how tightly TB has been checking the top line we need lower line players that can make something out of nothing and Grabner does that.
 

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,436
16,294
Ocean County
Is the PK problem a personnel issue or a systems one though? I mean yeah, certain players are better at PK than others, but there are still 4 other players on the ice (including the goalie) that PK also

The PK just has these mental lapses where players aren’t where they’re supposed to be or they’re chasing when they have no business doing so. Case in point is Lovejoy last night going behind the net chasing when he unequivocally should’ve went to the front of the net.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad