Confirmed Trade: [DET/STL] Robby Fabbri for Jacob de la Rose

Status
Not open for further replies.

WeWentBlues

Registered User
May 3, 2017
2,067
1,806
Berube liked Sanford more. I won't ever understand it. Fabbri would have looked good on the O'Reilly - Perron line.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
23,872
38,707
colorado
Visit site
You bring up Fabbri's injuries but make no mention that De La Rose has been hospitalized multiple times for heart issues. That risk is just as real moving forward

The fact is De La Rose is a replacement level player with virtually no offensive game. He's never had one at any level. Any tweener could plug into St. Louis's bottom 6 right now with the system they have.

Fabbri could glide around on one leg out there and still easily be the more useful player.
Obviously not to StL.
 

stl76

No. 5 in your programs, No. 1 in your hearts
Jul 2, 2015
9,039
8,320
Hated this trade the second I heard about it, and will continue to hate it for the foreseeable future.

Could not be happier to see Robby BIG TIME Fabbri score twice in his debut for the wings. Hope he bounces back in a big way. Detroit fans are going to love this kid, he is all heart.
 

Petes2424

Registered User
Aug 4, 2005
8,036
2,307
He’s going to open things up for AA 5 on 5 and for Mantha in the PP. it was a no brained for the Wings.

They’ll continue to make these type of deals. Some will work, some won’t. A lot of players don’t evolve until another team gave up on him for whatever reason. Strome is a recent example. If Yzerman makes 6 deals like this and 2 work out, it’s a good thing as their other young players mature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysses31

Harry Kakalovich

Registered User
Sep 26, 2002
6,236
4,321
Montreal
I liked DLR - too bad Habs lost him on waivers but there didn't seem to be any space for him - oh well can't keep them all - good luck in STL.
 

johnnybbadd

Registered User
Mar 29, 2011
981
893
Yep. This seems to be something that is missed a lot on HF.

Just because a team trades a struggling player who turns out great for a less than great return does NOT mean it was a bad trade because there is no guarantee the player would have turned out just as good if he wasn’t traded.

Even if Fabbri ends up great for Detroit, I won’t judge STL for giving up on him as he was doing nothing for them.

You bring up a good point about the fact that Fabbri needed a change of scenery but it doesn't excuse St Louis for getting a player that is nothing more than waiver fodder as the return for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeune Poulet

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,189
12,170
Tampere, Finland
How can this be so hard for people to understand?

STL got a player with perfect fit for their 4th line.

DET got a player who will give some scoring on their middle6.

Win-win.

Both did win. Players did hit for both teams needs.

Great trades are trades where nobody loses.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
21,142
14,882
You bring up a good point about the fact that Fabbri needed a change of scenery but it doesn't excuse St Louis for getting a player that is nothing more than waiver fodder as the return for him.

But what if that was the best offer they had? Why keep a player like Fabbri who you are frequently healthy scratching and doesn’t fit well on the fourth line? While the guy they got isn’t very good, he’s suited for the 4th line where they had an opening.

STL is a contending team on paper, they weren’t going to get a better player in return, and his value was likely no more than a 4th-5th rd pick. Either way STL was getting essentially nothing for Fabbri in return.

This seems similar to Burke essentially giving away Bryzgalov despite him being a great goalie (at the time) as a favour to the player to give him more playing time that he wasn’t going to get with his current team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 67Blues

ArGarBarGar

What do we want!? Unfair!
Sep 8, 2008
44,026
11,719
You bring up a good point about the fact that Fabbri needed a change of scenery but it doesn't excuse St Louis for getting a player that is nothing more than waiver fodder as the return for him.
There is no guarantee Fabbri gets it back together, so his value was about as low as it could get.

I don't think either team really loses on this deal. It sucks for St. Louis that a first rounder couldn't work out in their system, but sometimes you just have to cut your losses and get what you can get.
 

LarKing

Registered User
Sep 2, 2012
11,773
4,614
Michigan
Great debut for him last night. I was at the game and it was very strange to see some offense come from players outside of the top line. He threw a few hits too, really seems like he wants to get his career on track.
 

67Blues

Got it for Bobby
Mar 22, 2013
4,551
4,894
Section 111
Great debut for him last night. I was at the game and it was very strange to see some offense come from players outside of the top line. He threw a few hits too, really seems like he wants to get his career on track.
And I truly hope he does become a consistent 50 point scorer. Everyone is complaining about the return, but don't forget these are people playing hockey, and sometimes when a player doesn't fit into a system, the GM does him a solid and moves him knowing that the return is going to be nothing. They Blues may have even just let him walk after this season, and it was between getting a player that can dress or getting a low level pick that probably has a 10% chance of donning a sweater in 3-4 years.

Sometimes hockey moves are for personal reasons and don't always have to make sense.
 

Rangers ftw

Registered User
May 8, 2007
2,387
435
How can this be so hard for people to understand?

STL got a player with perfect fit for their 4th line.

DET got a player who will give some scoring on their middle6.

Win-win.

Both did win. Players did hit for both teams needs.

Great trades are trades where nobody loses.
Sure, but usually you don’t trade those types of players straight up.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
How can this be so hard for people to understand?

STL got a player with perfect fit for their 4th line.

DET got a player who will give some scoring on their middle6.

Win-win.

Both did win. Players did hit for both teams needs.

Great trades are trades where nobody loses.

The Blues lose

Any time you trade a middle 6 player for a 3th liner, you've lost

No matter how you try and spin it
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeThorntonsRooster

EurlichBachman

Registered User
Oct 30, 2017
429
649
Chicago
Sure, but usually you don’t trade those types of players straight up.
You do when one of them cannot crack your lineup and has had double ACL surgery. I hope he turns things around, but it was not going to happen in St. Louis. Best for everyone to just move on.
 

TK 421

Barbashev eats babies pass it on
Sep 12, 2007
6,458
6,112
You know who 'won'? Robby Fabbri. He even looks sharp in his Wings sweater and he's got a big smile on his face again. Great landing spot for him in Detroit and he still has fans here in STL that want to see him do well.
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,189
12,170
Tampere, Finland
The Blues lose

Any time you trade a middle 6 player for a 3th liner, you've lost

No matter how you try and spin it

But if you have drafted so well that you have 100 middle6 wingers and won't have roster space for all of them?

And have a need at 4th line type and/or center position.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
21,142
14,882
The Blues lose

Any time you trade a middle 6 player for a 3th liner, you've lost

No matter how you try and spin it

Not when that middle six winger was a healthy scratch because you have better top 6 options and he doesn’t fit on the 4th line.

As a Wings fan I don’t see any reason to judge STL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 67Blues

67Blues

Got it for Bobby
Mar 22, 2013
4,551
4,894
Section 111
If we just say that the Blues got absolutely boned and Fabbri will be an all star next year will that make people feel better and we can stop rehashing the topic over and over again?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad