ETTHAKING67
Registered User
- Feb 12, 2019
- 454
- 216
It wouldn't make sens for the Avs, they only way it would make sens from the Avs perspective is if they get Mantha in a deal. (Probably no 1f1)
If you want Girard you can start with Mantha and add from there
You wouldn't be adding after Mantha get real. AA wouldn't land Girard certainly, but lets not over rate Girard here!
Genuinely asking. He's better than Makar?
I'm guessing he thought Girard had the lowest value of Makar, Girard, Byram, Timmins...
Girard is also locked in for 7 years after this one at just 5M per. There is massive value to that.You wouldn't be adding after Mantha get real. AA wouldn't land Girard certainly, but lets not over rate Girard here!
Is fun fact code for stupid post with no context?Girard is also locked in for 7 years after this one at just 5M per. There is massive value to that.
Zero chance he gets moved for AA or Mantha because the value isn't there for the Avs. Sakic will wait till the offseason and sign a UFA or make a Bura-like trade if he feels they need another wing.
Fun fact, Girard had 29 points 2 more than Mantha.
You're asking for a top 4, more like top 2 d-man on a long-term, very inexpensive contract that is going to look incredible in 2 years when Seattle joins the NHL. You're adding to Mantha.
Girard is also locked in for 7 years after this one at just 5M per. There is massive value to that.
Zero chance he gets moved for AA or Mantha because the value isn't there for the Avs. Sakic will wait till the offseason and sign a UFA or make a Bura-like trade if he feels they need another wing.
Fun fact, Girard had 29 points 2 more than Mantha.
Just a back handed comment on Mantha's frail body. Being available to play is kinda important. 67 games last year, 54 this year IF he can stay healthy. Is this a trend? Seems so.Is fun fact code for stupid post with no context?
No its code for we are talking about current production and contracts. Not what if’s. You realize we are in no rush to get AA or Mantha. We don’t need scoring. We don’t need a lot actually. (Detroit does). Wait any longer on AA and maybe he can hit -60 before the trade deadline. That will help boost the return I bet.Is fun fact code for stupid post with no context?
Fun fact, Girard had 29 points 2 more than Mantha.
I don't care. The original proposal was terrible. No reason to make stupid posts comparing points between players with a difference of twenty games played.No its code for we are talking about current production and contracts. Not what if’s. You realize we are in no rush to get AA or Mantha. We don’t need scoring. We don’t need a lot actually. (Detroit does). Wait any longer on AA and maybe he can hit -60 before the trade deadline. That will help boost the return I bet.
Wait any longer on AA and maybe he can hit -60 before the trade deadline. That will help boost the return I bet.
Imagine if Sakic had this logic during Colorado's sub 50 point season, when Landeskog and Rantanen weren't even half PPG players.
Do you wantlol Apparently AVS fans think they can get players for nothing, lol shaking my head!!
lol Apparently AVS fans think they can get players for nothing, lol shaking my head!!
Girard is:
A) 21 years old
B) Already playing top 4 minutes
C) On pace for 40 points
D) Signed for 7 more years at 5M per
Players like that have sky high value, it's pointless to include him in a trade proposal.
Mantha isnt going anywhere. The WINGS are not going to trade their best goal scorer with size and grit.It wouldn't make sens for the Avs, they only way it would make sens from the Avs perspective is if they get Mantha in a deal. (Probably no 1f1)
lol Apparently AVS fans think they can get players for nothing, lol shaking my head!!